WASHINGTON, June 10 – The Federal Communications Commission has gone all out in its efforts against cable television operators, two speakers close to the cable industry said Thursday at a conference of the Alliance for Community Media here.
The unprecedented power accumulated by the FCC “should strike fear on all of us,” said Libby Beaty, executive director of the National Association of Telecommunication Officers and Advisors. The agency “has gone after local government and cable TV.”
NATOA represents local officials that supervise cable television franchises, and has been critical of FCC moves to bypass local franchise authorities.
“The worst thing in the world is to get the government involved” in the cable television business, said Dan Brenner, senior vice president for law and regulatory policy with the National Cable and Telecommunications Association, which represents leading cable operators.
“It’s micromanaging that we want [to] avoid,” he said.
Brenner said that the cable industry has changed the way Americans watch television. Irrespective of the looming February 19, 2009, deadline for the transition to digital broadcast television, for the most part the cable industry has already made its own transition, he said.
Beaty also said that public, educational and government channels (PEG) on cable systems provide key local content on cable television. The Alliance for Community Media brings together television programmers who offer alternative content on local PEG channels.
As an audience member pointed out that local PEG channels produce ten times more programming than do local broadcast stations.
Panelists, including Rick Chessen, senior legal advisor to Commissioner Michael Copps, agreed, and urged audience members to send videos, pictures and other briefing material to the FCC and to legislators in order to highlight this fact.
The more somebody makes their issues known to their member of Congress, the more that congressperson will care – providing that it affects the members’ constituents, said Beaty.
With regard to broadband, or the high-speed Internet services available via cable modems, Beaty said that her group’s focus was on “deployment and adoption.” She said that network neutrality still “has different meanings and all depends on who you talk to and what [is] the context.”
- Broadband Breakfast Live Online on Wednesday, October 21, 2020 — Preparing for Success
- Breakfast Media Minute: October 19, 2020
- Is House Judiciary Report a Fix for Big Tech, or a One-Sided Political Document?
- From the View of the California Emerging Technology Fund, Presidential Leadership Needed on Broadband
- California Wrestles With Efforts to Use Broadband for Distance Learning, Healthcare, and Digital Divide
Signup for Broadband Breakfast
Fiber5 months ago
Fiber Networks Hold a Cybersecurity Advantage Over Rival Co-Axial and Wireless Technologies, Say Panelists
Congress5 months ago
Senators Introduce Healthcare Broadband Bill as House Companion, Proposes $2 Billion Telehealth Expansion
Artificial Intelligence4 months ago
Brookings Panelists Emphasize Importance of Addressing Biases in Artificial Intelligence Technology
Broadband Roundup1 month ago
Nathan Simington is Trump’s New Man for FCC, New Speed Test, Challenges for State Net Neutrality
China6 months ago
China Expert Predicts that Nation’s Flawed Coronavirus Response Will Damage the Power of Chinese Communist Party
Rural6 months ago
Why the Rural Digital Opportunity Fund is So Significant, and How to Succeed in Applying For RDOF
Artificial Intelligence4 months ago
U.S. State Department Employing Artificial Intelligence Against COVID-19 Misinformation
Broadband's Impact3 months ago
Broadband Breakfast Live Online Launches Weekly Series Featuring ‘Champions of Broadband’