Cable Industry and Cable Regulators Lament Power of Federal Communications Commission

FCC, National Broadband Plan July 11th, 2008

, Former Reporter-Researcher, BroadbandBreakfast.com

WASHINGTON, June 10 – The Federal Communications Commission has gone all out in its efforts against cable television operators, two speakers close to the cable industry said Thursday at a conference of the Alliance for Community Media here.

The unprecedented power accumulated by the FCC “should strike fear on all of us,” said Libby Beaty, executive director of the National Association of Telecommunication Officers and Advisors. The agency “has gone after local government and cable TV.”

NATOA represents local officials that supervise cable television franchises, and has been critical of FCC moves to bypass local franchise authorities.

“The worst thing in the world is to get the government involved” in the cable television business, said Dan Brenner, senior vice president for law and regulatory policy with the National Cable and Telecommunications Association, which represents leading cable operators.

“It’s micromanaging that we want [to] avoid,” he said.

Brenner said that the cable industry has changed the way Americans watch television. Irrespective of the looming February 19, 2009, deadline for the transition to digital broadcast television, for the most part the cable industry has already made its own transition, he said.

Beaty also said that public, educational and government channels (PEG) on cable systems provide key local content on cable television. The Alliance for Community Media brings together television programmers who offer alternative content on local PEG channels.

As an audience member pointed out that local PEG channels produce ten times more programming than do local broadcast stations.

Panelists, including Rick Chessen, senior legal advisor to Commissioner Michael Copps, agreed, and urged audience members to send videos, pictures and other briefing material to the FCC and to legislators in order to highlight this fact.

The more somebody makes their issues known to their member of Congress, the more that congressperson will care – providing that it affects the members’ constituents, said Beaty.

With regard to broadband, or the high-speed Internet services available via cable modems, Beaty said that her group’s focus was on “deployment and adoption.” She said that network neutrality still “has different meanings and all depends on who you talk to and what [is] the context.”

You may also like:

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

One Response to “Cable Industry and Cable Regulators Lament Power of Federal Communications Commission”

  1. Charlie Stogner Says:

    Maybe some of you remember the Cold War story about being careful when sleeping with a bear; the point being you may wake up inside the bear.

    I’d advise members of organizations supportive of having PEG channels continue to be on cable beware of any appearance NCTA is on your side. It simply isn’t true. It is not FCC that is moving PEG channels to the upper stratosphere of the digital tiers or eliminating them. It is the cable operators.

    While cable retains their own commerical channels on basic tiers and tells Congress the digital tiers are just fine for PEG placement, C-SPAN, the cable industry’s own ‘look how good we are’, image maker that made successfully appealed to a branch of government, the U.S. Court, to ‘stay’ some rules that would have helped insure the continuance of locally produced commercial programming on cable sites. C-SPAN argued the new ‘leased access’ rules might result in them being moved from basic to analog tiers and that this would effectively put them out of business.

    So, beware of any NCTA official trying to appear to be supportive our PEG. It simply is another of cable’s big lies.

Leave a Reply