Broadband's Impact
Difficulty of Porting Telephone Numbers from Carriers Highlighted in House Hearing
WASHINGTON, July 22 – A Tuesday House subcommittee hearing on competition in the telecommunications industry focused on the ability of consumers to switch, or “port,” their telephone numbers from one carrier to another in a timely fashion.
WASHINGTON, July 22 – A Tuesday House subcommittee hearing on competition in the telecommunications industry focused on the ability of consumers to switch, or “port,” their telephone numbers from one carrier to another in a timely fashion.
The witnesses on the panel, before the House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Telecommunications and the Internet, agreed that it took too long for customers to port their telephone numbers to other companies.
Cathy Avgiris, senior vice president and gneral manager of voice ervices for Comcast Cable said that a denial of interconnection by telecommunications carriers constituted a denial of competition.
In an unusual decision by the Federal Communications Commission earlier this month, the agency held on a 4-1 vote that Verizon Communications was misuing information it obtained as from three cable companies – Comcast, Bright House and Time Warner – as part of the telephone porting process. In particular, they claimed that Verizon was offering price discounts to customers seeking to “port” their numbers to cable competitor.
FCC Chairman Kevin Martin dissented, siding with Verizon.
At the hearing, panelists said that customers prefer to keep their existing telephone numbers, even as they switch to competitors. The process currently takes about four to five business days. Avgiris said the time would drop with greater competition.
Former Rep. Matthew Salmon, R-Ariz., currently president of Comptel, a trade association of Bell company rivals, highlighted the importance of the competitive industry players.
Larissa Herda, CEO of Time Warner Telecom, a spinoff of Time Warner (which used to own the significant cable operator Time Warner Cable), said that her company, a competitive telecommunications player, wanted the subcommittee to be more aggressive in overseeing the FCC.
Web Sites Referenced by this Article:
- “Issues in Telecommunications Competition,” hearing notice, House Energy and Commerce Committee
- “Unusual FCC Decision on ‘Porting’ Finds Chairman Martin in a Minority of One,” Duane Morris LLP blog post
Education
Pre-Pandemic Survey of Internet Use by Commerce Department’s NTIA Finds Almost All College Students Online
WASHINGTON, July 22 – A Tuesday House subcommittee hearing on competition in the telecommunications industry focused on the ability of consumers to switch, or “port,” their telephone numbers from one carrier to another in a timely fashion.
The witnesses on the panel, before the House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Telecommunications and the Internet, agreed that it took too long for customers to port their telephone numbers to other companies.
Cathy Avgiris, senior vice president and gneral manager of voice ervices for Comcast Cable said that a denial of interconnection by telecommunications carriers constituted a denial of competition.
In an unusual decision by the Federal Communications Commission earlier this month, the agency held on a 4-1 vote that Verizon Communications was misuing information it obtained as from three cable companies – Comcast, Bright House and Time Warner – as part of the telephone porting process. In particular, they claimed that Verizon was offering price discounts to customers seeking to “port” their numbers to cable competitor.
FCC Chairman Kevin Martin dissented, siding with Verizon.
At the hearing, panelists said that customers prefer to keep their existing telephone numbers, even as they switch to competitors. The process currently takes about four to five business days. Avgiris said the time would drop with greater competition.
Former Rep. Matthew Salmon, R-Ariz., currently president of Comptel, a trade association of Bell company rivals, highlighted the importance of the competitive industry players.
Larissa Herda, CEO of Time Warner Telecom, a spinoff of Time Warner (which used to own the significant cable operator Time Warner Cable), said that her company, a competitive telecommunications player, wanted the subcommittee to be more aggressive in overseeing the FCC.
Web Sites Referenced by this Article:
- “Issues in Telecommunications Competition,” hearing notice, House Energy and Commerce Committee
- “Unusual FCC Decision on ‘Porting’ Finds Chairman Martin in a Minority of One,” Duane Morris LLP blog post
Digital Inclusion
Looming Income Inequality Demands a National Broadband Plan for the Next Decade, Says Benton Expert
WASHINGTON, July 22 – A Tuesday House subcommittee hearing on competition in the telecommunications industry focused on the ability of consumers to switch, or “port,” their telephone numbers from one carrier to another in a timely fashion.
The witnesses on the panel, before the House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Telecommunications and the Internet, agreed that it took too long for customers to port their telephone numbers to other companies.
Cathy Avgiris, senior vice president and gneral manager of voice ervices for Comcast Cable said that a denial of interconnection by telecommunications carriers constituted a denial of competition.
In an unusual decision by the Federal Communications Commission earlier this month, the agency held on a 4-1 vote that Verizon Communications was misuing information it obtained as from three cable companies – Comcast, Bright House and Time Warner – as part of the telephone porting process. In particular, they claimed that Verizon was offering price discounts to customers seeking to “port” their numbers to cable competitor.
FCC Chairman Kevin Martin dissented, siding with Verizon.
At the hearing, panelists said that customers prefer to keep their existing telephone numbers, even as they switch to competitors. The process currently takes about four to five business days. Avgiris said the time would drop with greater competition.
Former Rep. Matthew Salmon, R-Ariz., currently president of Comptel, a trade association of Bell company rivals, highlighted the importance of the competitive industry players.
Larissa Herda, CEO of Time Warner Telecom, a spinoff of Time Warner (which used to own the significant cable operator Time Warner Cable), said that her company, a competitive telecommunications player, wanted the subcommittee to be more aggressive in overseeing the FCC.
Web Sites Referenced by this Article:
- “Issues in Telecommunications Competition,” hearing notice, House Energy and Commerce Committee
- “Unusual FCC Decision on ‘Porting’ Finds Chairman Martin in a Minority of One,” Duane Morris LLP blog post
Digital Inclusion
Broadband and Education Policy Needs a Rethink in the Biden-Harris Administration, Say Panelists
WASHINGTON, July 22 – A Tuesday House subcommittee hearing on competition in the telecommunications industry focused on the ability of consumers to switch, or “port,” their telephone numbers from one carrier to another in a timely fashion.
The witnesses on the panel, before the House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Telecommunications and the Internet, agreed that it took too long for customers to port their telephone numbers to other companies.
Cathy Avgiris, senior vice president and gneral manager of voice ervices for Comcast Cable said that a denial of interconnection by telecommunications carriers constituted a denial of competition.
In an unusual decision by the Federal Communications Commission earlier this month, the agency held on a 4-1 vote that Verizon Communications was misuing information it obtained as from three cable companies – Comcast, Bright House and Time Warner – as part of the telephone porting process. In particular, they claimed that Verizon was offering price discounts to customers seeking to “port” their numbers to cable competitor.
FCC Chairman Kevin Martin dissented, siding with Verizon.
At the hearing, panelists said that customers prefer to keep their existing telephone numbers, even as they switch to competitors. The process currently takes about four to five business days. Avgiris said the time would drop with greater competition.
Former Rep. Matthew Salmon, R-Ariz., currently president of Comptel, a trade association of Bell company rivals, highlighted the importance of the competitive industry players.
Larissa Herda, CEO of Time Warner Telecom, a spinoff of Time Warner (which used to own the significant cable operator Time Warner Cable), said that her company, a competitive telecommunications player, wanted the subcommittee to be more aggressive in overseeing the FCC.
Web Sites Referenced by this Article:
- “Issues in Telecommunications Competition,” hearing notice, House Energy and Commerce Committee
- “Unusual FCC Decision on ‘Porting’ Finds Chairman Martin in a Minority of One,” Duane Morris LLP blog post
-
Broadband Roundup3 months agoNathan Simington is Trump’s New Man for FCC, New Speed Test, Challenges for State Net Neutrality
-
Fiber3 months agoUbiquitous Fiber Infrastructure is Essential to Maximize the Advantages of 5G, According to WIA Report
-
Section 2303 weeks agoPresident Trump’s FCC Nominee Grilled on Section 230 During Senate Confirmation Hearing
-
Innovation3 months agoGovernments and Central Banks Continue to Be Necessary with ‘Stable Coins’ and Cryptocurrencies
-
Broadband Roundup4 months agoCOVID-19 Disinformation and Contact Tracing Discussed at DNC, Rural Cloud Initiative, NTIA Internet Use Survey
-
#broadbandlive2 months agoBroadband Breakfast Live Online on Wednesday, September 30, 2020 — Champions of Broadband: Sunne McPeak
-
5G4 months agoNinth Circuit Upholds FCC’s Small Cell Deployment Order Designed to Promote 5G
-
5G2 months agoTop Executives From Dell, Dish Networks and T-Mobile Tout Details of Their Companies’ 5G Deployments