WASHINGTON, July 15 – After testifying Tuesday morning about their internet advertising agreement in the Senate, Google and Yahoo executives trekked to the other side of the capitol to address concerns of the House Judiciary Committee in the afternoon.
Chairman John Conyers, D-Mich., said that the committee's Task Force on Competition Policy and Antitrust Laws was concerned about competition on the Internet – but he was concerned about the prospect that Microsoft might seek to acquire Yahoo.
Addressing a June 12 agreement between Google and Yahoo, in which the top two online search companies announced a collaboration on a range of technologies, Yahoo General Counsel Michael Callahan said it is an opportunity to accelerate competition. The deal is “good for consumers, good for advertisers, and yes, good for Yahoo,” he said.
The strictly commercial arrangement is one in which the “two companies ... will remain autonomous and compete aggressively - in search and display advertising, mobile, news, e-mail, finance - you name it,” said Callahan.
Google Chief Legal Officer David Drummond said that there should be no worries, for Yahoo, that the marketplace is competitive, robust and dynamic.
Further, web site operators will have “better ad matching technology, potentially increasing the revenue they earn from their site,” said Drummond. Advertisers will have better ad matching capability, “giving them improved ways to reach online customers more efficiently.”
Microsoft General Counsel Brad Smith critize the agreement. Testifying over in the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust, Competition Policy and Consumer Rights, Smith recounted that Yahoo founder Jerry Yang said that if Yahoo and Google agreed to merge, competition in the search engine industry would cease.
But on the House side, Smith was forced to acknowledge the irony in Microsoft – a convicted antitrust law-breaker – pushing for government intervention to stop the deal.
Smith claimed that the Google-Yahoo agreement “will result in higher prices for advertisers and content creators.”
Another pro-Google-Yahoo voice was Tim Carter, CEO of www.askthebuilder.com. “The agreement between Google and Yahoo, as seen from my eyes as a consumer and an internet publisher, is actually a very good idea,” he said.
- Americans Skeptical About Tech, Funding For Broadband Maps, Court Classifies Uber and Lyft Drivers as Employees
- Ninth Circuit Upholds FCC’s Small Cell Deployment Order Designed to Promote 5G
- Breakfast Media Minute: August 12, 2020
- Telemedicine is Increasingly Important, But Comes With Challenges, Say Route Fifty Panelists
- Open Access Infrastructure Important, But Difficult to Develop, Say Digital Infrastructure Investment Panelists
Signup for Broadband Breakfast
Artificial Intelligence1 month ago
U.S. State Department Employing Artificial Intelligence Against COVID-19 Misinformation
Broadband Roundup1 month ago
Artificial Intelligence Task Force, State Cybersecurity, ADTRAN Offers Rural Funding Guidance
Infrastructure1 month ago
Michigan Broadband Cooperative Calls Report Saying Municipal Broadband Has an Unfair Advantage ‘Laughable’
Open Access4 weeks ago
In Danville, Virginia, an Early Adopter of Open Access Seeks to Prove the Business Model
Digital Inclusion1 month ago
‘Disconnection Day’ Looms as a Flouted ‘Keep Americans Connected’ Pledge Expires
5G1 month ago
Verizon CEO Hans Vestberg Describes 5G-to-the-Home Vision, Claiming U.S. Leads in 5G Deployment
Innovation1 month ago
Telecommunication Industry Working Group Aims to End Robocalls Through Cryptographic Credentials
Broadband's Impact3 weeks ago
Stakeholders and Tech Experts Gather to Discuss the Future of Internet Governance