WASHINGTON, February 8, 2009 - Fellow journalist Geoff Daily has a wonderful little post over on App-Rising.
Last night I had an epiphany about broadband mapping.
The challenge has long been that broadband providers refuse to make the data in their service maps transparent to the public. Their stated reason for this refusal is that this data is competitive intelligence.
But wait a minute: isn't the whole point of mapping broadband availability to spur deployment and competition?
Don't get me wrong, if I was an incumbent provider, there's no way I'd willingly give up my data. There's little upside to doing so unless I'm ready to start going hard after my competitors and they're forced to show their cards as well.
But from a policymaker's point of view, how is it we've come to accept that private providers making this data public is a bad thing when doing so would almost certainly lead to more competition?
To which I reply, Amen, Geoff!
I wholeheartedly agree with your rhetorical suggestion that "how is it we've come to accept that private providers making this data public is a bad thing when doing so would almost certainly lead to more competition?"
In fact, the FCC (even under Kevin Martin) agreed with you, too -- or at least your analysis that it would lead to more competition!
Reacting to a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit (filed by the Center for Public Integrity, when I was working there), the agency's legal briefings argued that releasing the data would lead to competition in communications – which was why it couldn’t release the data!
“Disclosure could allow competitors to free ride on the efforts of the first new entrant to identify areas where competition is more likely to be successful,” the agency told the federal district court in Washington.
It's inexcusable that the biggest broadband carriers have been able to ride the "broadband mapping" wave -- without once agreeing to provide public data about where they offer and don't offer service.
Readers can help make a difference in transparent broadband mapping by Taking the Broadband Census today!
- CBRS Crucial Amid Coronavirus Pandemic, Says ConnectX
- EARN IT Act, Impacting Section 230, Advances in Senate with New Encryption Amendment
- Reactions to Moving Forward Act, Increasing Platform Competition, Service Providers Keeping Americans Connected
- Examples of Governments Protecting Free Speech are Many, says German Marshall Fund
- Breakfast Media Minute: July 2, 2020
Signup for Broadband Breakfast
Fiber1 month ago
Fiber Networks Hold a Cybersecurity Advantage Over Rival Co-Axial and Wireless Technologies, Say Panelists
Congress1 month ago
Senators Introduce Healthcare Broadband Bill as House Companion, Proposes $2 Billion Telehealth Expansion
Artificial Intelligence2 weeks ago
Brookings Panelists Emphasize Importance of Addressing Biases in Artificial Intelligence Technology
Congress1 month ago
Partisan Disagreement Delays Broadband Funding That Might Come Through HEROES Act
#broadbandlive2 weeks ago
Broadband Breakfast Live Online on Wednesday, June 17, 2020 – Federal Broadband Funds and Opportunity Zones
Expert Opinion1 month ago
Gary Bolton: Under the Stress of COVID-19, the Networks That Held Fast Were Symmetrical Fiber Broadband
Broadband Roundup4 days ago
Artificial Intelligence Task Force, State Cybersecurity, ADTRAN Offers Rural Funding Guidance
Artificial Intelligence3 days ago
U.S. State Department Employing Artificial Intelligence Against COVID-19 Misinformation