Expert Opinion
The New York Times Highlights Consumers' Need for Carrier-Specific Broadband Data
WASHINGTON, February 11, 2009 – The New York Times highlights the efforts of BroadbandCensus.com to build a publicly-available database of the speeds, prices, availability, reliability and competition in the local broadband marketplace.
Blog Entries
WASHINGTON, February 11, 2009 – The New York Times highlights BroadbandCensus.com and our efforts to build a publicly-available database of the speeds, prices, availability, reliability and competition in the local broadband marketplace.
After introducing the $350 million in the fiscal stimulus for mapping broadband, and noting that other groups like Connected Nation have been comfortable working within the confidentiality restrictions imposed by telephone and cable companies, reporter Saul Hansell quotes me as follows:
“We ask carriers on a specific location basis what services they are providing,” said Drew Clark, the founder of Broadband Census, a Web site that is trying to build its own database of what Internet service is offered where. “They argue with a straight face that it is proprietary information where they offer service, even though every consumer who has broadband service knows who they get it from and where they live,” Mr. Clark said.
Hansell continues, suggesting the importance for the consumer of having publicly-available information of carrier-specific information. He doesn’t highlight it in this piece, but other nations — such as the government of Ireland — have compiled exactly such a list on a government web site.
Hansell continues:
The Internet providers say they are afraid that if they published a map of the services they offered, competitors would know exactly what pitch to send to which customers. Yes, those rivals have other ways to find out where they do business, but none are as easy as downloading a complete list.
Why not publish information that will let companies offer Americans better deals on Internet service than the ones they have now? And for that matter, if the government has a reason to collect a list of all the services available, why shouldn’t it let consumers look up that information to help them shop around?
BroadbandCensus.com wholeheartedly agrees.
“If the federal government is about to spend up to $9 billion on broadband,” [Mr. Clark] said, “it needs to know with a high degree of specificity who is providing broadband now, what technologies are being employed and at what speeds.
Blog Entries
WASHINGTON, February 11, 2009 – The New York Times highlights BroadbandCensus.com and our efforts to build a publicly-available database of the speeds, prices, availability, reliability and competition in the local broadband marketplace.
After introducing the $350 million in the fiscal stimulus for mapping broadband, and noting that other groups like Connected Nation have been comfortable working within the confidentiality restrictions imposed by telephone and cable companies, reporter Saul Hansell quotes me as follows:
“We ask carriers on a specific location basis what services they are providing,” said Drew Clark, the founder of Broadband Census, a Web site that is trying to build its own database of what Internet service is offered where. “They argue with a straight face that it is proprietary information where they offer service, even though every consumer who has broadband service knows who they get it from and where they live,” Mr. Clark said.
Hansell continues, suggesting the importance for the consumer of having publicly-available information of carrier-specific information. He doesn’t highlight it in this piece, but other nations — such as the government of Ireland — have compiled exactly such a list on a government web site.
Hansell continues:
The Internet providers say they are afraid that if they published a map of the services they offered, competitors would know exactly what pitch to send to which customers. Yes, those rivals have other ways to find out where they do business, but none are as easy as downloading a complete list.
Why not publish information that will let companies offer Americans better deals on Internet service than the ones they have now? And for that matter, if the government has a reason to collect a list of all the services available, why shouldn’t it let consumers look up that information to help them shop around?
BroadbandCensus.com wholeheartedly agrees.
“If the federal government is about to spend up to $9 billion on broadband,” [Mr. Clark] said, “it needs to know with a high degree of specificity who is providing broadband now, what technologies are being employed and at what speeds.
Expert Opinion
Paul LaManes and Tom McLaughlin: Lessons Learned from a Successful Municipal Broadband Project Partnership
Blog Entries
WASHINGTON, February 11, 2009 – The New York Times highlights BroadbandCensus.com and our efforts to build a publicly-available database of the speeds, prices, availability, reliability and competition in the local broadband marketplace.
After introducing the $350 million in the fiscal stimulus for mapping broadband, and noting that other groups like Connected Nation have been comfortable working within the confidentiality restrictions imposed by telephone and cable companies, reporter Saul Hansell quotes me as follows:
“We ask carriers on a specific location basis what services they are providing,” said Drew Clark, the founder of Broadband Census, a Web site that is trying to build its own database of what Internet service is offered where. “They argue with a straight face that it is proprietary information where they offer service, even though every consumer who has broadband service knows who they get it from and where they live,” Mr. Clark said.
Hansell continues, suggesting the importance for the consumer of having publicly-available information of carrier-specific information. He doesn’t highlight it in this piece, but other nations — such as the government of Ireland — have compiled exactly such a list on a government web site.
Hansell continues:
The Internet providers say they are afraid that if they published a map of the services they offered, competitors would know exactly what pitch to send to which customers. Yes, those rivals have other ways to find out where they do business, but none are as easy as downloading a complete list.
Why not publish information that will let companies offer Americans better deals on Internet service than the ones they have now? And for that matter, if the government has a reason to collect a list of all the services available, why shouldn’t it let consumers look up that information to help them shop around?
BroadbandCensus.com wholeheartedly agrees.
“If the federal government is about to spend up to $9 billion on broadband,” [Mr. Clark] said, “it needs to know with a high degree of specificity who is providing broadband now, what technologies are being employed and at what speeds.
Blog Entries
WASHINGTON, February 11, 2009 – The New York Times highlights BroadbandCensus.com and our efforts to build a publicly-available database of the speeds, prices, availability, reliability and competition in the local broadband marketplace.
After introducing the $350 million in the fiscal stimulus for mapping broadband, and noting that other groups like Connected Nation have been comfortable working within the confidentiality restrictions imposed by telephone and cable companies, reporter Saul Hansell quotes me as follows:
“We ask carriers on a specific location basis what services they are providing,” said Drew Clark, the founder of Broadband Census, a Web site that is trying to build its own database of what Internet service is offered where. “They argue with a straight face that it is proprietary information where they offer service, even though every consumer who has broadband service knows who they get it from and where they live,” Mr. Clark said.
Hansell continues, suggesting the importance for the consumer of having publicly-available information of carrier-specific information. He doesn’t highlight it in this piece, but other nations — such as the government of Ireland — have compiled exactly such a list on a government web site.
Hansell continues:
The Internet providers say they are afraid that if they published a map of the services they offered, competitors would know exactly what pitch to send to which customers. Yes, those rivals have other ways to find out where they do business, but none are as easy as downloading a complete list.
Why not publish information that will let companies offer Americans better deals on Internet service than the ones they have now? And for that matter, if the government has a reason to collect a list of all the services available, why shouldn’t it let consumers look up that information to help them shop around?
BroadbandCensus.com wholeheartedly agrees.
“If the federal government is about to spend up to $9 billion on broadband,” [Mr. Clark] said, “it needs to know with a high degree of specificity who is providing broadband now, what technologies are being employed and at what speeds.
-
Artificial Intelligence1 month agoU.S. Special Operations Command Employs AI and Machine Learning to Improve Operations
-
Section 2302 months agoPresident Trump’s FCC Nominee Grilled on Section 230 During Senate Confirmation Hearing
-
Broadband Roundup2 months agoBenton on Middle Mile Open Access Networks, CENIC Fiber Route in California, Investors Buying Bitcoin
-
#broadbandlive3 months agoBroadband Breakfast Live Online on Wednesday, November 18, 2020 — Case Studies of Transformative 5G Apps in the Enterprise
-
Broadband Roundup1 month agoTrump Signs Executive Order on Artificial Intelligence, How Not to Wreck the FCC, Broadband Performance in Europe
-
5G2 months ago5G Stands to Impact Industry Before Consumers, Says Verizon CEO Hans Vestberg
-
#broadbandlive4 months agoBroadband Breakfast Live Online on Wednesday, September 30, 2020 — Champions of Broadband: Sunne McPeak
-
5G4 months agoTop Executives From Dell, Dish Networks and T-Mobile Tout Details of Their Companies’ 5G Deployments