WASHINGTON, February 16, 2009 – With $7.2 billion in fiscal stimulus grants and loans marked to expand broadband infrastructure, industry groups, consumer advocates and some state regulators are supporting a proposal to fund broadband for low income households by tapping into the Universal Service Fund.
Thus far, the USF established by the Federal Communications Commission principally funds universal telephone service (and internet connections for schools and libraries), although there are numerous concerted efforts to extend USF monies to broadband.
The USF is funded by assessments on voice telephone service and administered by a Federal-State board of regulatory commissioners.
Last November, the FCC sought comment on a proposal supported by then-Chairman Kevin Martin for a pilot program that would subsidize broadband internet to low-income households.
Martin's proposal would make broadband Internet providers meet eligibility criteria for the USF’s Lifeline and Link Up funds. The programs are used to offset the cost of both monthly telephone service and connection charges for households that fall under a certain income threshold.
The Martin plan was put forward after TracFone, a reseller of prepaid wireless service, became the first wireless company eligible to receive Lifeline subsidies. Rick Brecker, a Greenberg Traurig attorney who represents TracFone before the FCC, told the audience at the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners conference here that the company's success at providing subsidized voice service made it natural to look at doing something similar with wireless broadband.
Several consumer groups filed comments in support of TracFone's petition. And NARUC's telecommunications committee is considering a resolution sponsored by D.C. Public Service Commissioner Betty Ann Kane supporting a modified version of the two year, $30 million program suggested by Martin.
Free Press research director Derek Turner said his organization supports both the FCC pilot and the NARUC resolution, but called the both proposed $300 million cost of the pilot and 40 percent target adoption rate "a fantasy." Turner suggested the true cost of a program on the scale Martin envisioned would require spending $1 billion over two years.
But a more modest proposal for using the $300 million could provide service for 812,000 homes that don't currently subscribe to broadband services, Turner said. Because "broadband is no longer a luxury," Turner said Free Press believes any increase in the use of broadband - "a technology that is vital for any individual to effectively participate in today's world" - is worth pursuing,
Computer and Communications Industry Association Vice President Cathy Sloan called increased broadband service -- whether via digital subscriber line (DSL), cable, or wireless, would be "a component of a more enlightened public policy." But any FCC program should be "harmonized" with the grants funded under the stimulus package.
Sloan cautioned the state commissioners at the NARUC meeting that broadband providers need not currently be eligible to receive funds under USF programs. And start-up companies that use new technologies should not have to pay into the fund to receive funds, she said. "New and more efficient business models should not be walled off [from the program]."
But Sloan warned against adopting too broad a definition of "Internet access devices" -- a category that could conceivably include smart phones. "We don't need to be subsidizing iPhones and Blackberries," she said.
The current FCC definitions for Lifeline service are obsolete, said AT&T regulatory counsel Beth Fujimoto. "Existing programs are very POTS-centric," she said, using industry slang for Plain Old Telephone Service.
Regulators shouldn't make broadband service follow rules designed for the voice era, Fujimoto said, calling for an FCC rulemaking to establish a new "Lifeline service provider" category.
Asking if any in the audience feared a return to rotary phones in the absence of rules mandating touch tones, Fujimoto called for a broad overhaul of the Lifeline program. "We really need to take a fresh look at what services should be offered."
- FCC Approves Radio Frequency Traffic Cops, Including Google and Sony, Bringing Commerce to 3.5 GHz Spectrum
- Broadband Roundup: Britain and Huawei, EPIC Fights Against Facial Recognition, E-Rate Fiber
- Panelists Debate Federal Role in Digital Privacy, But Agree Upon Need to Minimize Algorithmic Bias
- FCC ‘Coloring Outside the Lines’ on Broadband Mapping, Say Critics at Next Century Cities Event
- Broadband Advocates at Next Century Cities Emphasize Importance of Building Community Networks
Signup for Broadband Breakfast
Broadband Data8 months ago
Pennsylvania Broadband Speeds Worse Than Previously Believed, According to State Report
Broadband Data7 months ago
California Report: Income Most Significant Factor in Low Broadband Adoption
Intellectual Property6 months ago
In Congressional Oversight Hearing, Register of Copyrights Says Office Is Responding to Online Users
Privacy and Security5 months ago
Comparing Privacy Policies for Wearable Fitness Trackers: Apple, Fitbit, Xiaomi and Under Armour
FCC10 years ago
Telecom Companies Are Using Fight Interrupting Oscar Ceremony Broadcast To Manipulate Public and FCC, Argue Broadcasters
Antitrust5 months ago
Addressing the Impact of Big Data Upon Antitrust is More Complicated Than a Big Tech Breakup
Expert Opinion6 months ago
Geoff Mulligan: A ‘Dumb’ Way to Build Smart Cities
Broadband's Impact10 years ago
Make No Mistake: Internet Content Subscription Models will come!