NTIA
Rural Telco Co-op Puts Cash Into WiMax Plan
ASHBURN, Va., April 28, 2009 – Looks like rural WiMax provider DigitalBridge Communications has found some new friends in the rural telco business, judging by a couple of announcements today from both Digital Bridge and the National Rural Telecommunications Cooperative (NRTC), which represents some 1,400 rural electric and telephone utilities across 48 states.
ASHBURN, Va., April 28, 2009 - Looks like rural WiMax provider DigitalBridge Communications has found some new friends in the rural telco business, judging by a couple of announcements today from both Digital Bridge and the National Rural Telecommunications Cooperative (NRTC), which represents some 1,400 rural electric and telephone utilities across 48 states.
The twin announcements - an unspecified amount of funding by NRTC into DigitalBridge, and an agreement under which DigitalBridge will participate in WiMax rollouts by NRTC members - seem squarely focused on helping rural operations get so-called "shovel-ready" projects in line to grab some of the $7.2 billion in rural broadband stimulus funds that the government will spend by September 2010.
As we dig for more information, two things jump out of these agreements: One, that DigitalBridge could secure any further funding at all in the current economy speaks volumes of the investors' confidence that WiMax is a technology worth betting on. And two, by joining forces with the NRTC, DigitalBridge becomes a trusted supplier to all those rural telcos who might be applying for the stimulus funds -- gaining the kind of access and marketing reach that a small operation like DBC might not have been able to quickly secure on its own.
Though small, DigitalBridge is well known in WiMax circles for its WiMax installations, including mobile WiMax services in Jackson Hole, Wyo., that were arguably "the first to market" in the U.S., beating the Baltimore and Portland launches from Sprint/Clearwire.
Paul Kapustka is editor and founder of Sidecut Reports.
-
Intellectual Property3 months agoIn Congressional Oversight Hearing, Register of Copyrights Says Office Is Responding to Online Users
-
Broadband Data5 months agoPennsylvania Broadband Speeds Worse Than Previously Believed, According to State Report
-
Broadband Data4 months agoCalifornia Report: Income Most Significant Factor in Low Broadband Adoption
-
Privacy and Security2 months agoComparing Privacy Policies for Wearable Fitness Trackers: Apple, Fitbit, Xiaomi and Under Armour
-
Antitrust1 month agoAddressing the Impact of Big Data Upon Antitrust is More Complicated Than a Big Tech Breakup
-
Expert Opinion3 months agoGeoff Mulligan: A ‘Dumb’ Way to Build Smart Cities
-
Antitrust1 month agoBroadband Roundup: Everyone (Almost) Gangs Up on Google, Muni Broadband Fact Sheet, SHLB Anchornet Conference
-
Broadband Roundup2 months agoCable Industry Touts Energy Efficiency, Next Century Highlights Open Access Fiber, Aspen Forum Set
Brett Glass
May 5, 2009 at 1:07 pm
This is odd indeed. DigitalBridge operates on licensed spectrum, and does not have spectrum available to it in many markets. So, why is a nationwide organization investing in it when it likely will not be able to cover many of its members’ areas? And what business does a nonprofit have picking “winners and losers,” or favoring one provider over another?