Better Broadband Better Lives

Copps Responds to Senators, Orders Handset Agreement Probe

in Wireless by

WASHINGTON, Thursday June 18, 2009 -  After a frenetic burst of activity on and off Capitol Hill, Acting FCC Chairman Michael Copps (D) announced on Thursday an investigation into whether consumers are being harmed by exclusive contracts between handset manufacturers and wireless carriers.

Senators John Kerry, D-Mass., Roger Wicker, R-Miss., Byron Dorgan, D-N.D. and Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn. kicked off the controversy Monday as they co-signed a letter to Copps demanding an investigation.

The senators asked Copps to examine exclusivity agreements in order to investigate the extent of their effects on consumers choice.  Following hearings on wireless industry business practices in both the Senate Commerce and Judiciary Committees, Copps told Broadband Policy Summit attendees Thursday that he would accede to the senators' request.

"We must open a proceeding to examine exclusive wireless handset agreements," Copps said, so consumers can "reap the benefits of a robust marketplace."

In a statement posted Tuesday on his website, Kerry had specifically singled out AT&T's iPhone and Verizon's BlackBerry Storm as prime examples of handset exclusivity agreements limiting consumers' choice of carrier.

Copps said he doesn't see any difference between how wireline and wireless broadband providers should treat customers' equipment choices, he said in an interview.

Wireless carriers shouldn't be able to mandate a specific phone any more than a cable company can require a Windows-based computer instead of a Macintosh, he suggested.  And Carterfone-type open access requirements should apply to the wireless network just as they do the wireline phone network, Copps said.

Free Press policy director Ben Scott said his organization was "grateful" to Copps for his decision. "The path to innovation is paved by openness," Scott said. "Unlocking devices is a good start."

Andrew Feinberg is the White House Correspondent and Managing Editor for Breakfast Media. He rejoined in late 2016 after working as a staff writer at The Hill and as a freelance writer. He worked at from its founding in 2008 to 2010, first as a Reporter and then as Deputy Editor. He also covered the White House for Russia's Sputnik News from the beginning of the Trump Administration until he was let go for refusing to use White House press briefings to promote conspiracy theories, and later documented the experience in a story which set off a chain of events leading to Sputnik being forced to register under the Foreign Agents Registration Act. Andrew's work has appeared in such publications as The Hill, Politico, Communications Daily, Washington Internet Daily, Washington Business Journal, The Sentinel Newspapers, FastCompany.TV, Mashable, and Silicon Angle.

1 Comment

  1. Yes, that’s right. A wireless carrier’s engineers shouldn’t be able to specify an appropriate phone for use on a particular network any more than your doctor should be allowed to prescribe which pills you take.

    After all, there couldn’t possibly be any reason why one piece of digital equipment would be more compatible with the network than another. Or why using the wrong one could disrupt the network, causing everyone’s service to g098[2oin/’ y9[ ac0–3hjuj;. a8bcx[ NO CARRIER

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


Latest from Wireless

Go to Top