Editor’s Note: This is the one of a series of panelist summary articles that BroadbandCensus.com will be reporting from the Telecommunications Policy Research Conference, September 25-27, at George Mason University School of Law in Arlington, Va.
ARLINGTON, Va., September 26, 2009 - Whether internet service providers will accelerate early efforts to prioritize bandwidth, and what impact such measure might have upon the open internet, were actively discussed by panelists at the Telecommunications Policy Research Conference here.
Traditionally, internet traffic has been managed by the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP), the engineering standard for almost all internet transmissions. When there is a great demand for internet content than is available to flow over the network at any given point in time, "each flow of the network gets a roughly equal share of the bottleneck capacity," according to Steve Bauer, a professor of computer science at MIT.
Bauer was presenting a paper on "The Evolution of Internet Congestion," with Professor David Clark and William Lehr, also of MIT.
Such a standard for routing internet traffic has been dubbed "TCP Fair," and this approach remains the standard for dealing with congestion. However, a variety of internet providers, including Comcast - which was punished by the FCC for blocking traffic from the BitTorrent application - have been experimenting with alternatives.
Bauer said that Comcast and other broadband providers have been experimenting with changes to the "TCP Fair" approach because of changing expectation by end users, changing composition of internet traffic, and because of new ideas - ideas challenging the traditional notion of "end-to-end" internet - emerging in the technical community.
Among the alternatives, or additions to, the "TCP Fair" approach include re-ECN, or a re-feedback of Explicit Congestion Notification, LEDBAT, and P4P, or peer-four-peer, an approach to peer-to-peer (P2P) communications that allows DSL providers to maximize the effectiveness of their networks.
Considering the validity of different approaches is particularly significant in light of Federal Communications Communication Chairman Julius Genachowski's announcement, this past Monday, that the agency will begin implement Network Neutrality requirements.
Bauer recommended that the academic community "obtain more data about traffic patterns, congestion and usage [while also] ensuring that transparency requirements don't discourage experimentation with new congestion management techniques."
Also speaking on the panel was Nicholas Weaver, a software expert at the International Computer Science Institute at the University of California at Berkeley. Weaver highlighted the unusual economics of P2P communications. Content providers save enormous amounts. He said CNN has saved up to 30 percent of bandwidth costs by aggressively using P2P.
"But the internet service providers sees a magnification of costs," said Weaver. The economics can be changed, however, but the introduction of peer-to-peer "edge caches" that are offered free of charge.
Panelists for this session included:
- Marius Schwartz, Georgetown University (Moderator)
- Steve Bauer, David Clark, William Lehr: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
- Guenter Knieps, Albert Ludwigs Universitat Freiburg
- Nicholas Weaver, ICSI
- Advocates for Antitrust Enforcement Say Consumer Welfare Standard Only One Layer of Competition Law
- In Law More Than a Year, MOBILE Now Advocates Say Act Requires Further Implementation for 5G Deployment
- Broadband Roundup: Texas Reaches T-Mobile Settlement, Closing the ‘Homework Gap,’ Broadcast Ownership
- UTOPIA Fiber Announces Completion of Latest Round of Funding, a $48 Million Network Expansion
- Prakash Sangam: China’s Huawei Clones Are Greater Threat to National Security than Huawei
Signup for Broadband Breakfast
Intellectual Property4 months ago
In Congressional Oversight Hearing, Register of Copyrights Says Office Is Responding to Online Users
Broadband Data6 months ago
California Report: Income Most Significant Factor in Low Broadband Adoption
Privacy and Security3 months ago
Comparing Privacy Policies for Wearable Fitness Trackers: Apple, Fitbit, Xiaomi and Under Armour
Antitrust3 months ago
Addressing the Impact of Big Data Upon Antitrust is More Complicated Than a Big Tech Breakup
Expert Opinion5 months ago
Geoff Mulligan: A ‘Dumb’ Way to Build Smart Cities
Antitrust3 months ago
Broadband Roundup: Everyone (Almost) Gangs Up on Google, Muni Broadband Fact Sheet, SHLB Anchornet Conference
Broadband Roundup4 months ago
Cable Industry Touts Energy Efficiency, Next Century Highlights Open Access Fiber, Aspen Forum Set
Broadband's Impact5 months ago
Law Enforcement and Advocates of Facial Recognition Technologies Battle Misconceptions