Connect with us

Smart Grid

Net Neutrality Step Aside, Carbon Neutrality Is Moving In

WASHINGTON, November 9, 2009 – While some tech companies have sought to reduce their carbon footprint in the world, a number of them have been reluctant to do this. Instead, they have been buying into environmentally-friendly projects meant to offset their carbon emissions. While technology companies have considered carbon offset projects, such as investing in a forest sequestration project to balance out there carbon emissions, more are opting to place greater emphasis on developing innovative solutions to reduce energy consumption within company walls.

Avatar

Published

on

WASHINGTON, November 9, 2009 – While some tech companies have sought to reduce their carbon footprint in the world, a number of them have been reluctant to do this. Instead, they have been buying into environmentally-friendly projects meant to offset their carbon emissions.

While technology companies have considered carbon offset projects, such as investing in a forest sequestration project to balance out there carbon emissions, more are opting to place greater emphasis on developing innovative solutions to reduce energy consumption within company walls.

But companies such as Google and Dell, who have committed themselves to being “carbon neutral,” say that they have needed the carbon offset projects to meet their goals. Other companies, such as Hewlett-Packard and Yahoo, have moved away from offset investments.

Google Green Energy Czar Bill Weihl’s wrote in a blog post in May 2009 that the company has been honoring its 2007 commitment to being “carbon neutral” through calculating its global carbon footprint and purchasing high-quality carbon offsets. “We’ll continue to invest in offset projects until we reach carbon neutrality,” read the blog.

However, Google’s blog notes that “While offsets with strong additionality can achieve real emissions reductions in unregulated sectors at a relatively low cost, we view them as a short-term solution for Google, not as a substitute for other action.”

The company said that offsets “provide a way for us to take responsibility for our emissions now, while we continue to advocate the development of utility-scale renewable energy. Current standards for offsets require a significant amount of work to evaluate the quality of each offset project and ensure that projects go beyond ‘business as usual.’ Stronger additionality standards – that are more stringent, clear, and objective – would also make it simpler for corporations like Google to use offsets as part of an overall strategy to neutralize emissions.”

Google said it plans to continue to purchase offsets but will focus on engineering technology solutions, using on-site renewable energy to power its facilities and look to design more energy efficient data centers.
Dell said in a September 2009 release that it has reduced its net greenhouse gas emissions by more than 18 percent in its fiscal year 2009 over fiscal year 2008.

The company has been reducing its total electricity consumption, using renewable energy sources and investing in carbon offsets.

Dell “offsets its remaining carbon impact by purchasing credible, third-party-verified renewable energy credits. This investment helped the company become the only company in the computer industry to achieve operational carbon neutrality in August 2008, five months ahead of schedule,” according to the company’s statement.

But while Google and Dell continue to invest in carbon offset projects, Yahoo announced this year that it will no longer purchase any offsets and HP spoke critically of them in its blog.

Yahoo’s David Filo wrote in a June blog entry that the company would stop investing in carbon offset projects. “Reducing our carbon footprint has always been a priority and we’ve decided to focus all our energy and investment on that philosophy. We will no longer purchase carbon offsets as announced in 2007.” Filo said his company plans to focus on reducing its own carbon impact by creating highly-efficient data centers.

According to a September blog entry from Hewlett-Packard, “A number of electronic companies have claimed to be “carbon neutral” at this point in time” and claim to “achieve this through the use of Carbon offset which are actually put in question by a number of studies.”

Another entry from the blog, which is generated by a team of members of HP’s global manufacturing and distribution industries, continues that, “HP’s progress on the green front “is due to its long term commitment to reducing the environmental footprint of all its operations, and not based on carbon offset or any other substitution program.”

The Broadband Breakfast Club

Editor’s Note: Join the next Broadband Breakfast Club on Tuesday, November 10, 2009, when a panel of experts – including Jennifer Alcott, Telework!VA Program Manager, Commonwealth of Virginia; Kevin Moss, Head of Corporate Social Responsibility, BT Americas; Steven Ruth, Professor, George Mason University School of Public Policy; and Donald L. Thoma, Executive Vice President Marketing, Iridium – will discuss “Setting the Table for the National Broadband Plan: The Environment.”

Among the questions to be considered are how carbon-positive a technology is broadband? What’s keeping telecommuting from being more widely adopted as a technology? What are the other “green” benefits of broadband communication, and how can the National Broadband Plan best encourage them? Register athttp://broadbandbreakfast.eventbrite.com

Advanced Energy

White House Launches ‘Smart City’ Initiative That Links Broadband Connectivity to Urban Solutions

WASHINGTON, September 16, 2015 – A movement to make cities “smart” by using the power of broadband and information technology processing power is reaching critical mass, with the White House on Monday announcing a comprehensive initiative to support municipal efforts.

Coinciding with the Smart Cities Week conference here this week, the White House released a 4,000-word summary of more than $160 million in federal research investments, leveraging more than 25 technology collaborations with local communities.

The goal of these efforts? Tackling such key challenges, in the words of the White House, as “reducing traffic congestion, fighting crime, fostering economic growth, managing the effects of a changing climate, and improving the delivery of city services.”

“Advances in science and technology have the potential to accelerate these efforts,” read the White House statement. “An emerging community of civic leaders, data scientists, technologists, and companies are joining forces to build ‘Smart Cities’ – communities that are building an infrastructure to continuously improve the collection, aggregation, and use of data to improve the life of their residents – by harnessing the growing data revolution, low-cost sensors, and research collaborations, and doing so securely to protect safety and privacy.”

The launch of White House Smart Cities Initiative

[More…]

Drew Clark

Published

on

WASHINGTON, November 9, 2009 – While some tech companies have sought to reduce their carbon footprint in the world, a number of them have been reluctant to do this. Instead, they have been buying into environmentally-friendly projects meant to offset their carbon emissions.

While technology companies have considered carbon offset projects, such as investing in a forest sequestration project to balance out there carbon emissions, more are opting to place greater emphasis on developing innovative solutions to reduce energy consumption within company walls.

But companies such as Google and Dell, who have committed themselves to being “carbon neutral,” say that they have needed the carbon offset projects to meet their goals. Other companies, such as Hewlett-Packard and Yahoo, have moved away from offset investments.

Google Green Energy Czar Bill Weihl’s wrote in a blog post in May 2009 that the company has been honoring its 2007 commitment to being “carbon neutral” through calculating its global carbon footprint and purchasing high-quality carbon offsets. “We’ll continue to invest in offset projects until we reach carbon neutrality,” read the blog.

However, Google’s blog notes that “While offsets with strong additionality can achieve real emissions reductions in unregulated sectors at a relatively low cost, we view them as a short-term solution for Google, not as a substitute for other action.”

The company said that offsets “provide a way for us to take responsibility for our emissions now, while we continue to advocate the development of utility-scale renewable energy. Current standards for offsets require a significant amount of work to evaluate the quality of each offset project and ensure that projects go beyond ‘business as usual.’ Stronger additionality standards – that are more stringent, clear, and objective – would also make it simpler for corporations like Google to use offsets as part of an overall strategy to neutralize emissions.”

Google said it plans to continue to purchase offsets but will focus on engineering technology solutions, using on-site renewable energy to power its facilities and look to design more energy efficient data centers.
Dell said in a September 2009 release that it has reduced its net greenhouse gas emissions by more than 18 percent in its fiscal year 2009 over fiscal year 2008.

The company has been reducing its total electricity consumption, using renewable energy sources and investing in carbon offsets.

Dell “offsets its remaining carbon impact by purchasing credible, third-party-verified renewable energy credits. This investment helped the company become the only company in the computer industry to achieve operational carbon neutrality in August 2008, five months ahead of schedule,” according to the company’s statement.

But while Google and Dell continue to invest in carbon offset projects, Yahoo announced this year that it will no longer purchase any offsets and HP spoke critically of them in its blog.

Yahoo’s David Filo wrote in a June blog entry that the company would stop investing in carbon offset projects. “Reducing our carbon footprint has always been a priority and we’ve decided to focus all our energy and investment on that philosophy. We will no longer purchase carbon offsets as announced in 2007.” Filo said his company plans to focus on reducing its own carbon impact by creating highly-efficient data centers.

According to a September blog entry from Hewlett-Packard, “A number of electronic companies have claimed to be “carbon neutral” at this point in time” and claim to “achieve this through the use of Carbon offset which are actually put in question by a number of studies.”

Another entry from the blog, which is generated by a team of members of HP’s global manufacturing and distribution industries, continues that, “HP’s progress on the green front “is due to its long term commitment to reducing the environmental footprint of all its operations, and not based on carbon offset or any other substitution program.”

The Broadband Breakfast Club

Editor’s Note: Join the next Broadband Breakfast Club on Tuesday, November 10, 2009, when a panel of experts – including Jennifer Alcott, Telework!VA Program Manager, Commonwealth of Virginia; Kevin Moss, Head of Corporate Social Responsibility, BT Americas; Steven Ruth, Professor, George Mason University School of Public Policy; and Donald L. Thoma, Executive Vice President Marketing, Iridium – will discuss “Setting the Table for the National Broadband Plan: The Environment.”

Among the questions to be considered are how carbon-positive a technology is broadband? What’s keeping telecommuting from being more widely adopted as a technology? What are the other “green” benefits of broadband communication, and how can the National Broadband Plan best encourage them? Register athttp://broadbandbreakfast.eventbrite.com

Continue Reading

Broadband's Impact

Global Cities Teams Challenges Next Round: Nov. 12-13, 2015

Editor’s Note: We’ve received this note from the Global Cities Teams Challenges of the National Institute of Standards and Technology and US Ignite. Read more about the these important challenges.

Save the Date – An Important Event Related to the Next Round of the Global Cities Teams Challenge: November 12-13, 2015

Municipal leaders and innovators will gather at the NIST Campus in Gaithersburg, Maryland on November 12-13 for an important event related to the next round of Global City Team Challenge (GCTC). An agenda for the November event and a summary of exciting changes that NIST and US Ignite have planned for the next round of the GCTC will be circulated soon.

[more…]

Broadband Breakfast Staff

Published

on

WASHINGTON, November 9, 2009 – While some tech companies have sought to reduce their carbon footprint in the world, a number of them have been reluctant to do this. Instead, they have been buying into environmentally-friendly projects meant to offset their carbon emissions.

While technology companies have considered carbon offset projects, such as investing in a forest sequestration project to balance out there carbon emissions, more are opting to place greater emphasis on developing innovative solutions to reduce energy consumption within company walls.

But companies such as Google and Dell, who have committed themselves to being “carbon neutral,” say that they have needed the carbon offset projects to meet their goals. Other companies, such as Hewlett-Packard and Yahoo, have moved away from offset investments.

Google Green Energy Czar Bill Weihl’s wrote in a blog post in May 2009 that the company has been honoring its 2007 commitment to being “carbon neutral” through calculating its global carbon footprint and purchasing high-quality carbon offsets. “We’ll continue to invest in offset projects until we reach carbon neutrality,” read the blog.

However, Google’s blog notes that “While offsets with strong additionality can achieve real emissions reductions in unregulated sectors at a relatively low cost, we view them as a short-term solution for Google, not as a substitute for other action.”

The company said that offsets “provide a way for us to take responsibility for our emissions now, while we continue to advocate the development of utility-scale renewable energy. Current standards for offsets require a significant amount of work to evaluate the quality of each offset project and ensure that projects go beyond ‘business as usual.’ Stronger additionality standards – that are more stringent, clear, and objective – would also make it simpler for corporations like Google to use offsets as part of an overall strategy to neutralize emissions.”

Google said it plans to continue to purchase offsets but will focus on engineering technology solutions, using on-site renewable energy to power its facilities and look to design more energy efficient data centers.
Dell said in a September 2009 release that it has reduced its net greenhouse gas emissions by more than 18 percent in its fiscal year 2009 over fiscal year 2008.

The company has been reducing its total electricity consumption, using renewable energy sources and investing in carbon offsets.

Dell “offsets its remaining carbon impact by purchasing credible, third-party-verified renewable energy credits. This investment helped the company become the only company in the computer industry to achieve operational carbon neutrality in August 2008, five months ahead of schedule,” according to the company’s statement.

But while Google and Dell continue to invest in carbon offset projects, Yahoo announced this year that it will no longer purchase any offsets and HP spoke critically of them in its blog.

Yahoo’s David Filo wrote in a June blog entry that the company would stop investing in carbon offset projects. “Reducing our carbon footprint has always been a priority and we’ve decided to focus all our energy and investment on that philosophy. We will no longer purchase carbon offsets as announced in 2007.” Filo said his company plans to focus on reducing its own carbon impact by creating highly-efficient data centers.

According to a September blog entry from Hewlett-Packard, “A number of electronic companies have claimed to be “carbon neutral” at this point in time” and claim to “achieve this through the use of Carbon offset which are actually put in question by a number of studies.”

Another entry from the blog, which is generated by a team of members of HP’s global manufacturing and distribution industries, continues that, “HP’s progress on the green front “is due to its long term commitment to reducing the environmental footprint of all its operations, and not based on carbon offset or any other substitution program.”

The Broadband Breakfast Club

Editor’s Note: Join the next Broadband Breakfast Club on Tuesday, November 10, 2009, when a panel of experts – including Jennifer Alcott, Telework!VA Program Manager, Commonwealth of Virginia; Kevin Moss, Head of Corporate Social Responsibility, BT Americas; Steven Ruth, Professor, George Mason University School of Public Policy; and Donald L. Thoma, Executive Vice President Marketing, Iridium – will discuss “Setting the Table for the National Broadband Plan: The Environment.”

Among the questions to be considered are how carbon-positive a technology is broadband? What’s keeping telecommuting from being more widely adopted as a technology? What are the other “green” benefits of broadband communication, and how can the National Broadband Plan best encourage them? Register athttp://broadbandbreakfast.eventbrite.com

Continue Reading

Infrastructure

Update on the Global City Teams Challenge and Recently Announced NSF Funding Opportunities

Broadband Breakfast Staff

Published

on

WASHINGTON, November 9, 2009 – While some tech companies have sought to reduce their carbon footprint in the world, a number of them have been reluctant to do this. Instead, they have been buying into environmentally-friendly projects meant to offset their carbon emissions.

While technology companies have considered carbon offset projects, such as investing in a forest sequestration project to balance out there carbon emissions, more are opting to place greater emphasis on developing innovative solutions to reduce energy consumption within company walls.

But companies such as Google and Dell, who have committed themselves to being “carbon neutral,” say that they have needed the carbon offset projects to meet their goals. Other companies, such as Hewlett-Packard and Yahoo, have moved away from offset investments.

Google Green Energy Czar Bill Weihl’s wrote in a blog post in May 2009 that the company has been honoring its 2007 commitment to being “carbon neutral” through calculating its global carbon footprint and purchasing high-quality carbon offsets. “We’ll continue to invest in offset projects until we reach carbon neutrality,” read the blog.

However, Google’s blog notes that “While offsets with strong additionality can achieve real emissions reductions in unregulated sectors at a relatively low cost, we view them as a short-term solution for Google, not as a substitute for other action.”

The company said that offsets “provide a way for us to take responsibility for our emissions now, while we continue to advocate the development of utility-scale renewable energy. Current standards for offsets require a significant amount of work to evaluate the quality of each offset project and ensure that projects go beyond ‘business as usual.’ Stronger additionality standards – that are more stringent, clear, and objective – would also make it simpler for corporations like Google to use offsets as part of an overall strategy to neutralize emissions.”

Google said it plans to continue to purchase offsets but will focus on engineering technology solutions, using on-site renewable energy to power its facilities and look to design more energy efficient data centers.
Dell said in a September 2009 release that it has reduced its net greenhouse gas emissions by more than 18 percent in its fiscal year 2009 over fiscal year 2008.

The company has been reducing its total electricity consumption, using renewable energy sources and investing in carbon offsets.

Dell “offsets its remaining carbon impact by purchasing credible, third-party-verified renewable energy credits. This investment helped the company become the only company in the computer industry to achieve operational carbon neutrality in August 2008, five months ahead of schedule,” according to the company’s statement.

But while Google and Dell continue to invest in carbon offset projects, Yahoo announced this year that it will no longer purchase any offsets and HP spoke critically of them in its blog.

Yahoo’s David Filo wrote in a June blog entry that the company would stop investing in carbon offset projects. “Reducing our carbon footprint has always been a priority and we’ve decided to focus all our energy and investment on that philosophy. We will no longer purchase carbon offsets as announced in 2007.” Filo said his company plans to focus on reducing its own carbon impact by creating highly-efficient data centers.

According to a September blog entry from Hewlett-Packard, “A number of electronic companies have claimed to be “carbon neutral” at this point in time” and claim to “achieve this through the use of Carbon offset which are actually put in question by a number of studies.”

Another entry from the blog, which is generated by a team of members of HP’s global manufacturing and distribution industries, continues that, “HP’s progress on the green front “is due to its long term commitment to reducing the environmental footprint of all its operations, and not based on carbon offset or any other substitution program.”

The Broadband Breakfast Club

Editor’s Note: Join the next Broadband Breakfast Club on Tuesday, November 10, 2009, when a panel of experts – including Jennifer Alcott, Telework!VA Program Manager, Commonwealth of Virginia; Kevin Moss, Head of Corporate Social Responsibility, BT Americas; Steven Ruth, Professor, George Mason University School of Public Policy; and Donald L. Thoma, Executive Vice President Marketing, Iridium – will discuss “Setting the Table for the National Broadband Plan: The Environment.”

Among the questions to be considered are how carbon-positive a technology is broadband? What’s keeping telecommuting from being more widely adopted as a technology? What are the other “green” benefits of broadband communication, and how can the National Broadband Plan best encourage them? Register athttp://broadbandbreakfast.eventbrite.com

Continue Reading

Recent

Signup for Broadband Breakfast

Get twice-weekly Breakfast Media news alerts.
* = required field

Trending