Broadband's Impact
Towards Universal Broadband: Flexible Broadband Pricing and the Digital Divide
WASHINGTON, November 16, 2009 – The difference in the adoption of high-speed internet technology between the technological savvy and the unsophisticated may not constitute a digital divide so much as a lag between lower- and high-income groups, according to experts assembled by the Georgetown Center for Business and Public Policy.
In a report by Kevin Hassett and Robert Shapiro, “Towards Universal Broadband Flexible Broadband Pricing and the Digital Divide,” the authors honed in on the effects broadband pricing. They presented their research at a Friday morning event.
WASHINGTON, November 16, 2009 – The difference in the adoption of high-speed internet technology between the technological savvy and the unsophisticated may not constitute a digital divide so much as a lag between lower- and high-income groups, according to experts assembled by the Georgetown Center for Business and Public Policy.
In a report by Kevin Hassett and Robert Shapiro, “Towards Universal Broadband Flexible Broadband Pricing and the Digital Divide,” the authors honed in on the effects broadband pricing. They presented their research at a Friday morning event.
“The percentage of homes connected to broadband service increased from 33 percent in spring 2005 to 63 percent in spring 2009,” said the report.
According to John Mayo, executive director of the Georgetown Center for Business and Public Policy, the deployment of any technology that has this type of increase rate appears to have a success story, but “the deployment has not been uniform.”
Broken down into the categories of wealth and race, Hassett and Shapiro found that the use of broadband was more common in the past for people of higher income than it was for people who were poorer.
“The factors that drive technological advances are price decreases,” Shapiro said. In addition, “As the value of technology advances, bringing the price down, they diffuse across income groups.”
While 63 percent of the country is currently connected to broadband, 37 percent are not connected; they are the ones who are currently feeling the effects of being disconnected.
“There is an idea that a lot of investment is needed for bandwidth,” Hassett said. He criticized that perspective.
Using the example of a provider investing $300 million in higher capacity to make its service more appealing to consumers, Hassett countered: two-thirds of the country is already connected with broadband and the other third could not possibly afford it. How is the provider going to make up its $300 million investment and still keep prices low? It just isn’t possible, he said. The provider would need to increase their price.
Shapiro and Hassett also looked at different possibilities to help the deployment of broadband to those who cannot afford a monthly payment plus premiums.
Leaving the prices that people pay at the level they are now is one suggestion. Using this model, Shapiro and Hassett found that with no price increases for broadband, “we would expect to see universal broadband by 2017.”
Hassett and Shapiro touted the tiered pricing system that, they said, had been used in Norway and in Korea. Under such a system, price is connected to the amount of bandwidth used: instead of being one flat rate.
Only being charged for the bandwidth that is being used could be of benefit for those who are “sensitive of the increase price of broadband as their income falls,” said Hassett.
Broadband's Impact
Federal Focus On Municipal Builds Rubs Against States’ Policy Opposing Practice: Report

WASHINGTON, November 16, 2009 – The difference in the adoption of high-speed internet technology between the technological savvy and the unsophisticated may not constitute a digital divide so much as a lag between lower- and high-income groups, according to experts assembled by the Georgetown Center for Business and Public Policy.
In a report by Kevin Hassett and Robert Shapiro, “Towards Universal Broadband Flexible Broadband Pricing and the Digital Divide,” the authors honed in on the effects broadband pricing. They presented their research at a Friday morning event.
“The percentage of homes connected to broadband service increased from 33 percent in spring 2005 to 63 percent in spring 2009,” said the report.
According to John Mayo, executive director of the Georgetown Center for Business and Public Policy, the deployment of any technology that has this type of increase rate appears to have a success story, but “the deployment has not been uniform.”
Broken down into the categories of wealth and race, Hassett and Shapiro found that the use of broadband was more common in the past for people of higher income than it was for people who were poorer.
“The factors that drive technological advances are price decreases,” Shapiro said. In addition, “As the value of technology advances, bringing the price down, they diffuse across income groups.”
While 63 percent of the country is currently connected to broadband, 37 percent are not connected; they are the ones who are currently feeling the effects of being disconnected.
“There is an idea that a lot of investment is needed for bandwidth,” Hassett said. He criticized that perspective.
Using the example of a provider investing $300 million in higher capacity to make its service more appealing to consumers, Hassett countered: two-thirds of the country is already connected with broadband and the other third could not possibly afford it. How is the provider going to make up its $300 million investment and still keep prices low? It just isn’t possible, he said. The provider would need to increase their price.
Shapiro and Hassett also looked at different possibilities to help the deployment of broadband to those who cannot afford a monthly payment plus premiums.
Leaving the prices that people pay at the level they are now is one suggestion. Using this model, Shapiro and Hassett found that with no price increases for broadband, “we would expect to see universal broadband by 2017.”
Hassett and Shapiro touted the tiered pricing system that, they said, had been used in Norway and in Korea. Under such a system, price is connected to the amount of bandwidth used: instead of being one flat rate.
Only being charged for the bandwidth that is being used could be of benefit for those who are “sensitive of the increase price of broadband as their income falls,” said Hassett.
Broadband's Impact
Experts Weigh What Future Of Broadband Could Look Like Under Biden’s Infrastructure Plan

WASHINGTON, November 16, 2009 – The difference in the adoption of high-speed internet technology between the technological savvy and the unsophisticated may not constitute a digital divide so much as a lag between lower- and high-income groups, according to experts assembled by the Georgetown Center for Business and Public Policy.
In a report by Kevin Hassett and Robert Shapiro, “Towards Universal Broadband Flexible Broadband Pricing and the Digital Divide,” the authors honed in on the effects broadband pricing. They presented their research at a Friday morning event.
“The percentage of homes connected to broadband service increased from 33 percent in spring 2005 to 63 percent in spring 2009,” said the report.
According to John Mayo, executive director of the Georgetown Center for Business and Public Policy, the deployment of any technology that has this type of increase rate appears to have a success story, but “the deployment has not been uniform.”
Broken down into the categories of wealth and race, Hassett and Shapiro found that the use of broadband was more common in the past for people of higher income than it was for people who were poorer.
“The factors that drive technological advances are price decreases,” Shapiro said. In addition, “As the value of technology advances, bringing the price down, they diffuse across income groups.”
While 63 percent of the country is currently connected to broadband, 37 percent are not connected; they are the ones who are currently feeling the effects of being disconnected.
“There is an idea that a lot of investment is needed for bandwidth,” Hassett said. He criticized that perspective.
Using the example of a provider investing $300 million in higher capacity to make its service more appealing to consumers, Hassett countered: two-thirds of the country is already connected with broadband and the other third could not possibly afford it. How is the provider going to make up its $300 million investment and still keep prices low? It just isn’t possible, he said. The provider would need to increase their price.
Shapiro and Hassett also looked at different possibilities to help the deployment of broadband to those who cannot afford a monthly payment plus premiums.
Leaving the prices that people pay at the level they are now is one suggestion. Using this model, Shapiro and Hassett found that with no price increases for broadband, “we would expect to see universal broadband by 2017.”
Hassett and Shapiro touted the tiered pricing system that, they said, had been used in Norway and in Korea. Under such a system, price is connected to the amount of bandwidth used: instead of being one flat rate.
Only being charged for the bandwidth that is being used could be of benefit for those who are “sensitive of the increase price of broadband as their income falls,” said Hassett.
Education
Libraries Must Be Vigilant To Ensure Adequate Broadband, Consultants Say

WASHINGTON, November 16, 2009 – The difference in the adoption of high-speed internet technology between the technological savvy and the unsophisticated may not constitute a digital divide so much as a lag between lower- and high-income groups, according to experts assembled by the Georgetown Center for Business and Public Policy.
In a report by Kevin Hassett and Robert Shapiro, “Towards Universal Broadband Flexible Broadband Pricing and the Digital Divide,” the authors honed in on the effects broadband pricing. They presented their research at a Friday morning event.
“The percentage of homes connected to broadband service increased from 33 percent in spring 2005 to 63 percent in spring 2009,” said the report.
According to John Mayo, executive director of the Georgetown Center for Business and Public Policy, the deployment of any technology that has this type of increase rate appears to have a success story, but “the deployment has not been uniform.”
Broken down into the categories of wealth and race, Hassett and Shapiro found that the use of broadband was more common in the past for people of higher income than it was for people who were poorer.
“The factors that drive technological advances are price decreases,” Shapiro said. In addition, “As the value of technology advances, bringing the price down, they diffuse across income groups.”
While 63 percent of the country is currently connected to broadband, 37 percent are not connected; they are the ones who are currently feeling the effects of being disconnected.
“There is an idea that a lot of investment is needed for bandwidth,” Hassett said. He criticized that perspective.
Using the example of a provider investing $300 million in higher capacity to make its service more appealing to consumers, Hassett countered: two-thirds of the country is already connected with broadband and the other third could not possibly afford it. How is the provider going to make up its $300 million investment and still keep prices low? It just isn’t possible, he said. The provider would need to increase their price.
Shapiro and Hassett also looked at different possibilities to help the deployment of broadband to those who cannot afford a monthly payment plus premiums.
Leaving the prices that people pay at the level they are now is one suggestion. Using this model, Shapiro and Hassett found that with no price increases for broadband, “we would expect to see universal broadband by 2017.”
Hassett and Shapiro touted the tiered pricing system that, they said, had been used in Norway and in Korea. Under such a system, price is connected to the amount of bandwidth used: instead of being one flat rate.
Only being charged for the bandwidth that is being used could be of benefit for those who are “sensitive of the increase price of broadband as their income falls,” said Hassett.
-
Artificial Intelligence3 months ago
Artificial Intelligence Aims to Enhance Human Capabilities, But Only With Caution and Safeguards
-
Fiber3 months ago
Smaller Internet Providers Were Instrumental to Fiber Deployment in 2020, Says Fiber Broadband Association
-
Cybersecurity3 months ago
Internet of Things Connected Devices Are Inherently Insecure, Say Tech Experts
-
Privacy1 month ago
New Laws Needed on Capturing Data Collection From Mixed Reality, Experts Say
-
White House3 months ago
Building Better Broadband Underscores Joe Biden’s Top Policy Initiatives
-
Artificial Intelligence1 month ago
Staying Ahead On Artificial Intelligence Requires International Cooperation
-
Digital Inclusion2 months ago
AT&T CEO John Stankey Joins Call For E-Rate Expansion To Households
-
#broadbandlive1 month ago
Broadband Breakfast Live Online Wednesday, March 24, 2021 – The State of Online Higher Education