WASHINGTON, January 29, 2010 - In his keynote address to the Free State Foundation on Friday, Federal Communications Commissioner Robert McDowell said that the agency’s number one goal in the national broadband plan should be to do no harm.
He was concerned, he said, that the agency was considering classifying providers of broadband infrastructure as a common carrier under Title II of the Telecommunications Act.
Re-regulating internet services in such a manner might lead to a parade of horribles, McDowell said – as well as vexing nuts-and-bolts questions since the deregulatory push of the past decade remade the structure of much of telecommunications law.
According to McDowell, the main goal of the National Broadband Plan should be to encourage innovation and competition. He cited numerous examples of wireless broadband in smart phone applications to make daily life more convenient for Americans, and to literally provide a lifeline for victims of the earthquake in Haiti.
McDowell said that America’s wireless broadband market is an illustration of how well policies that encourage competition over regulation work for consumers.
To encourage innovation, the national broadband plan should take a flexible and hands-off approach, he said, rather than proposing heavy-handed industrial policy. Such a governmentally-directed plan should not foreclose positive and constructive developments that are not known today.
In addition to the national broadband plan, McDowell addressed the net neutrality, or open internet, proceeding. He said one couldn’t discuss broadband competition without also discussing net neutrality.
Both the Commerce Department’s National Telecommunications and Information Administration and the Justice Department’s antitrust division have made comments in the proceeding encouraging the FCC to be cautious in enacting regulation, and to avoid stifling infrastructure investments needed to expand broadband access.
Discussing telecom regulation, McDowell said that a new regulatory framework would impact the economics of the Internet.
Broadband adoption would increase through affordable pricing, McDowell said. Private sector investments in broadband infrastructure should be encouraged.
The most common of current pricing methods is flat-rate pricing. McDowell said he was wary of nondiscriminatory pricing models. If every consumer were treated the same regardless of usage, then all prices must rise to compensate for the costs imposed by heavy users.
This possible result would undermine efforts to promote affordable broadband for all Americans, he said.
- FCC Takes Two Actions Promoting Spectrum Sharing, Also Implements 988 as Suicide Hotline
- Telephony Industry Rises to the Challenge of Robocalls, With Legislation, Regulation and Enforcement Close Behind
- Lifeline Remains the Best Method for Connecting All Americans, Says FCC’s Geoffrey Starks
- Connectivity and Mobility Are Key Pillars of Metropolitan Development, Say Congresswomen at Smart City Event
- Lawmakers, Prosecutors and Big Tech Companies Spar at Senate Hearing Over Unlocking Encryption
Signup for Broadband Breakfast
5G3 months ago
Broadband Roundup: CBRS on a Roll, Innovation Fund in Rural California, Another Verizon 5G Announcement
Antitrust2 months ago
Broadband Roundup: Comcast vs. Google, Sprint’s Open 5G Network, Ransomware Rises
Spectrum2 months ago
Wireless Internet Providers Excited About Multiple Spectrum Sharing Opportunities, Including FCC Priority Access
5G2 months ago
Questions of Public vs. Private Auction and Role of 5G Spectrum Dominate Conference on C-Band
Net Neutrality2 months ago
D.C. Circuit’s Decision in Net Neutrality Case Likely to Open New Fronts of Attack Against FCC
Tribal Broadband3 months ago
Wireless Broadband Likely to be a Key Component in Getting Broadband to Tribal Country
National Broadband Plan2 months ago
Sanders, Warren and Buttigieg: Democratic Presidential Candidates With a Broadband Plan
China3 weeks ago
Prakash Sangam: China’s Huawei Clones Are Greater Threat to National Security than Huawei