Broadband Updates
New Study Suggests Benefits for Net Neutrality Policies
WASHINGTON, January 14, 2010 – Internet service providers and content providers are at a disadvantage since they are not compensated for all of the information they disseminate, and that leads to systematic underinvestment in the Internet, posits a new paper (PDF).
The authors of “Free to Invest: The Economic Benefits of Preserving Network Neutrality” say if that income could be accessed, government policy could help overcome that market failure.
WASHINGTON, January 14, 2010 - Internet service providers and content providers are at a disadvantage since they are not compensated for all of the information they disseminate, and that leads to systematic underinvestment in the Internet, posits a new paper (PDF).
The authors of “Free to Invest: The Economic Benefits of Preserving Network Neutrality” say if that income could be accessed, government policy could help overcome that market failure.
Without network neutrality rules, new technologies could lead to pricing practices that transfer wealth from content providers to ISPs, which the authors say is a form of price discrimination investment for Internet content managers. Web site owners, bloggers, news organizations and others would have less incentive to expand their sites and applications, says the report, published by the Institute for Policy Integrity at the New York University School of Law.
The authors, Inimai Chettiar and J. Scott Holladay, say additional investment in broadband infrastructure also would increase the value of the Internet by making it faster and accessible in more places.
“But charging content providers for access to ISP customers is an extremely inefficient economic tool to do that, primarily because most additional revenue generated for ISPs is likely to be transferred to their shareholders rather than invested in expanding broadband lines,” they say.
-
China4 weeks agoChina Expert Predicts that Nation’s Flawed Coronavirus Response Will Damage the Power of Chinese Communist Party
-
Broadband Data1 month agoCenturyLink CTO Boasts Success in Handling Coronavirus-Induced ‘Hot’ Networks, Credits Company’s Fiber Push
-
Big Tech3 weeks agoThe Rise, Reign, and Self-Repair of Zoom
-
Net Neutrality1 month agoPublic Interest Groups Blast FCC For Refusal to Extend Public Safety Deadline on Net Neutrality Comments
-
#broadbandlive4 weeks agoBroadband Breakfast Live Online on Wednesday, April 29, 2020 – Will the Coronavirus Lead to a Loss of Privacy? Weighing Contact Tracing and Broadband Surveillance
-
Broadband's Impact1 month agoArtificial Intelligence Not Very Helpful in Addressing the Coronavirus, Say Experts on Brookings Panel
-
Rural3 weeks agoWhy the Rural Digital Opportunity Fund is So Significant, and How to Succeed in Applying For RDOF
-
Fiber3 weeks agoFiber Optics Generally a Better Option Than Wireless, Even in Rural Areas, Says Municipal Broadband Advocate
Brett Glass
January 17, 2010 at 9:21 pm
Interesting. The “Institute for Policy Integrity” claims to be a nonprofit “think tank,” but does not show up on the IRS list of registered nonprofits or in the guidestar.org database of nonprofits. And it seems to advocate every possible kinds of regulation, regardless of its merits.
Worst of all, the group founds its arguments for onerous regulation of the Internet on the false premise that there’s no choice. In fact, there’s a vibrant and highly competitive market for Internet services — which, in fact, the proposed regulation would threaten.