WASHINGTON, February 2, 2010 - Three minority business groups came together on Tuesday to criticize proposed network neutrality regulations, and discussed their joint filing on the subject at the Federal Communications Commission.
Harry Alford, president of the National Black Chamber of Commerce, Justin Nelson, president of the National Gay and Lesbian Chamber of Commerce, and Javier Palomarez, president of the U.S. Hispanic Chamber of Commerce participated in the conference call.
The business officials expressed concern over internet regulation, emphasizing their priority to bring broadband access to minority populations.
They said that broadband plays a role in job creation and as a vehicle for innovation, growth, and competition. This, they said, was a reason to avoid net neutrality regulations, as they could slow down the deployment of broadband networks in underserved areas.
In response to a question about how the national broadband plan reflected their own agenda, Alford and Palomarez said that the national plan should help provide better broadband access for small business owners.
The speakers also said that they needed to educate their constituents about the use of broadband. Alford said that African-American small business ownership has grown rapidly, due in part to use of broadband technology.
Alford and Nelson also spoke about the role that telecommunications has played in recovering from the Haiti earthquake. The use of mobile broadband devices was particularly significant in aiding victims.
Nelson used the response to the Haitian earthquake to argue against regulation.
When asked why they believed investments and Net Neutrality were mutually exclusive, Alford and Palomarez said bureaucracy was a major concern, and Alford also criticized the FCC’s proposed regulation as being too “hypothetical.”
Nelson said that the lack of predictability in telecommunications made regulation pointless, and that Net neutrality would only slow down broadband deployment in underserved areas as a result.
“We’ve seen what happens with regulation elsewhere; it ties industry’s hands,” Nelson said.
“There is a lack of demonstrated need for regulation in an industry that has been largely open and available,” he said. “We don’t want to see anything happen that will stifle growth and opportunity for small businesses, no matter where they are in the country—let them compete and be globally competitive.”
- Many Facets of Wireless Industry Join to Celebrate Launch of OnGo Using Mid-Band Spectrum
- Benton Foundation Renamed Benton Institute for Broadband and Society, Renewed Focus on Advanced Internet Networks
- Who’s On First? Congress Upset With Wasteful and Petty Antitrust Squabbles Between Justice and FTC
- Broadband Roundup: CBRS on a Roll, Innovation Fund in Rural California, Another Verizon 5G Announcement
- Broadband Roundup: FCC Announces More Rural Funding, Everyone On Expands Footprint, US Telecom Gets Political
Intellectual Property2 months ago
In Congressional Oversight Hearing, Register of Copyrights Says Office Is Responding to Online Users
Broadband Data4 months ago
Pennsylvania Broadband Speeds Worse Than Previously Believed, According to State Report
Broadband Data3 months ago
California Report: Income Most Significant Factor in Low Broadband Adoption
Privacy and Security2 weeks ago
Comparing Privacy Policies for Wearable Fitness Trackers: Apple, Fitbit, Xiaomi and Under Armour
Broadband Roundup1 month ago
Cable Industry Touts Energy Efficiency, Next Century Highlights Open Access Fiber, Aspen Forum Set
Drones1 month ago
Greater Commercial Use of Drones Will Force Revisions of Federal Aviation Administration Regulations, Say Experts
Expert Opinion2 months ago
Geoff Mulligan: A ‘Dumb’ Way to Build Smart Cities
Fiber1 month ago
‘Dig Once’ Provides Future-Proofing Solution for Federal Highway Infrastructure, Says BroadbandNow