- Image via Wikipedia
With the recent battle between Cablevision and Disney over Retransmission Consent in New York regarding WABC-TV carriage on Cablevisions 3.1 million subscribers, and thereby producing a coalition of Cable Providers to petition the FCC to intervene in negotiations, is akin to the saying: (be careful what you ask for).
It seems to me, this is a business market negotiation best handled through competitive market forces rather than asking the FCC to get involved in a dispute between two companies. The (ax can cut both ways) when it comes to oversight of the pipeline distribution and broadcasting industries. Yes, consumers are caught in the middle, wanting pertinent and relevant programming for a reasonable price, while public negotiations and threats of signal cuts dominate the headlines; see (Cable firms seek FCC help in fee disputes).
The issue remains, how much is WABC-TV worth to Cablevision for carriage and distribution of their signal. Retransmission Consent was formulated years ago when broadcast stations wanted assurance that cable companies would carry their local signals, and be compensated for their original programming. In the beginning most broadcasters just asked for Must-Carry, or assurance their signals would be distributed by pipeline providers for 3 years, see (Moody’s expects to see more retrans battles).
Fast-Forward to today and times have changed. Providers are paying substantial sums per month to distribute most of their programming to consumers. Cable Programmers have reaped the benefits of these carriage agreements in producing top-quality programs through carriage fees along with ad supported revenues; a dual revenue model. Broadcasters are struggling to stay afloat with the single, Ad Revenue Model. Therefore, Retransmission Consent has become a battleground for demanding monthly carriage fees, just as most Cable Programmers ask for, and receive. Broadcasters have seen a significant drop in Ad Revenues in recent years along with a lose network subsidies. Without additional revenue streams, broadcasters are looking to lucrative distribution agreements to make up the short-fall.
This is a market demand negotiation, not a regulation matter for the FCC to consider. If Cable Providers want to lessen the impact of these carriage fees, they should consider (Tiering) Broadcast signals to accommodate and moderate fee increases. Yes, if negotiations demand an unreasonable price for most customers, negotiate for the signal to be on a Tier where consumers can pay an extra cost if they value the programming. Some consumers will lose in this scenario, but overall consumer rates would be adjusted for those who can afford the additional cost.
This is not a regulatory issue, but one of market demand and supply. In my opinion the coalition of cable providers should think twice before asking the FCC to intervene in their business negotiations, or risk having regulations that regulate them into non-existence. This is a Free Market System, let it work as intended.
Related articles by Zemanta
- Time Warner Cable to ask FCC for new rules on negotiating programming deals (latimesblogs.latimes.com)
- Cable and satellite operators take their case to Congress (latimesblogs.latimes.com)
- Cable Companies Petition FCC (online.wsj.com)
- Broadband Roundup: Justice Clarence Thomas Expresses Regret on Brand X, Clearview AI Hacked, Online Privacy Act
- Registration Available for Digital Infrastructure Investment at Broadband Communities Summit on April 27, 2020
- In the Quest to Build a Better Map, Many Non-Profits and Consultants Bring Creativity and Grit to Broadband Data
- America is Either ‘In Very Good Shape’ or Has ‘Big Catch-Up’ in 5G Race with China
- Broadband Roundup: Tesla Cars Ain’t Driverless, Suspicious Bernie Sanders Facebook Posts, ReConnect Awards
Signup for Broadband Breakfast
Broadband's Impact1 month ago
Todd Foje: Can High-Speed Broadband Finally Bridge the Gap Between Rural and Urban Communities?
Digital Inclusion2 weeks ago
New Technology of Augmented Reality, Including Eye Control, Enable Greater Access By Disability Community
Broadband Data3 weeks ago
Despite Promising Gains in Connectivity, Report from Broadband Now Highlights the Extent of the Digital Divide
5G1 month ago
Gordon Smith: Can a 5G Fund Connect Rural America at 21st Century Speeds?
FCC Workshops1 month ago
Indian Tribes Will Have Six-Month Window of Opportunity to Apply for Former EBS Spectrum at 2.5 GigaHertz
Expert Opinion2 weeks ago
An Open Letter to Gwynne Shotwell, Elon Musk and Starlink Leadership: Three Reasons to Make Starlink Open Access for America’s Local ISPs
Broadband's Impact4 weeks ago
Rural Healthcare Providers Could Be Surprised by FCC’s Recent Changes to Rural Healthcare Program
Expert Opinion3 weeks ago
Jeff Grappone: State of the Union Address Is No Longer the Political Equivalent of the Super Bowl