Recovery Act
State Telecom Regulators Score NTIA and RUS for Unclear Tax Situation; Seek IRS Ruling
WASHINGTON, March 8, 2010 – The National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners on Monday urged the Treasury Department to clarify the tax implications for the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act.
NARUC criticized the Commerce Department and the Agriculture Department for failing to clarify whether Broadband Technologies Opportunity Program grants, Broadband Infrastructure Program grants, and broadband mapping grants are taxable.
WASHINGTON, March 8, 2010 – The National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners on Monday urged the Treasury Department to clarify the tax implications for the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act.
NARUC criticized the Commerce Department and the Agriculture Department for failing to clarify whether Broadband Technologies Opportunity Program grants, Broadband Infrastructure Program grants, and broadband mapping grants are taxable.
“Indeed, the most recent FAQ on point provided by NTIA/RUS appears to raise more issues and resolve none,” said NARUC.
The FAQ [frequently asked questions] from NTIA and RUS reads:
“Q: Are BIP grants taxable? If so, can the grantee use grant funds to pay the taxes?
A: Applicants who are not exempt from taxation should consult with their tax advisors on the potential tax consequences of BIP grants. Federal taxes are not an eligible cost under Federal grant programs such as BIP. For an example of the analysis that the IRS may apply to BIP grants see: http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/n-03-18.pdf. BIP staff cannot provide guidance on tax implications to applicants.”
NARUC called on the Treasury Department and its Internal Revenue Service to rule on whether the grants are taxable. Taxing grant money given to awardees could undercut the projects’ budgets by 35 percent to 40 percent, NARUC said, and would add an extra level of undue hardship.
Broadband Mapping
In Discussing ‘Broadband and the Biden Administration,’ Trump and Obama Transition Workers Praise Auctions

WASHINGTON, March 8, 2010 – The National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners on Monday urged the Treasury Department to clarify the tax implications for the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act.
NARUC criticized the Commerce Department and the Agriculture Department for failing to clarify whether Broadband Technologies Opportunity Program grants, Broadband Infrastructure Program grants, and broadband mapping grants are taxable.
“Indeed, the most recent FAQ on point provided by NTIA/RUS appears to raise more issues and resolve none,” said NARUC.
The FAQ [frequently asked questions] from NTIA and RUS reads:
“Q: Are BIP grants taxable? If so, can the grantee use grant funds to pay the taxes?
A: Applicants who are not exempt from taxation should consult with their tax advisors on the potential tax consequences of BIP grants. Federal taxes are not an eligible cost under Federal grant programs such as BIP. For an example of the analysis that the IRS may apply to BIP grants see: http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/n-03-18.pdf. BIP staff cannot provide guidance on tax implications to applicants.”
NARUC called on the Treasury Department and its Internal Revenue Service to rule on whether the grants are taxable. Taxing grant money given to awardees could undercut the projects’ budgets by 35 percent to 40 percent, NARUC said, and would add an extra level of undue hardship.
National Broadband Plan
National Broadband Plan Has Held Up Well, With Notable Downsides, Say Authors

WASHINGTON, March 8, 2010 – The National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners on Monday urged the Treasury Department to clarify the tax implications for the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act.
NARUC criticized the Commerce Department and the Agriculture Department for failing to clarify whether Broadband Technologies Opportunity Program grants, Broadband Infrastructure Program grants, and broadband mapping grants are taxable.
“Indeed, the most recent FAQ on point provided by NTIA/RUS appears to raise more issues and resolve none,” said NARUC.
The FAQ [frequently asked questions] from NTIA and RUS reads:
“Q: Are BIP grants taxable? If so, can the grantee use grant funds to pay the taxes?
A: Applicants who are not exempt from taxation should consult with their tax advisors on the potential tax consequences of BIP grants. Federal taxes are not an eligible cost under Federal grant programs such as BIP. For an example of the analysis that the IRS may apply to BIP grants see: http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/n-03-18.pdf. BIP staff cannot provide guidance on tax implications to applicants.”
NARUC called on the Treasury Department and its Internal Revenue Service to rule on whether the grants are taxable. Taxing grant money given to awardees could undercut the projects’ budgets by 35 percent to 40 percent, NARUC said, and would add an extra level of undue hardship.
Digital Inclusion
Authors of the 2010 National Broadband Plan Say That a ‘Refresh’ Should Not Only Be Up to FCC

WASHINGTON, March 8, 2010 – The National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners on Monday urged the Treasury Department to clarify the tax implications for the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act.
NARUC criticized the Commerce Department and the Agriculture Department for failing to clarify whether Broadband Technologies Opportunity Program grants, Broadband Infrastructure Program grants, and broadband mapping grants are taxable.
“Indeed, the most recent FAQ on point provided by NTIA/RUS appears to raise more issues and resolve none,” said NARUC.
The FAQ [frequently asked questions] from NTIA and RUS reads:
“Q: Are BIP grants taxable? If so, can the grantee use grant funds to pay the taxes?
A: Applicants who are not exempt from taxation should consult with their tax advisors on the potential tax consequences of BIP grants. Federal taxes are not an eligible cost under Federal grant programs such as BIP. For an example of the analysis that the IRS may apply to BIP grants see: http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/n-03-18.pdf. BIP staff cannot provide guidance on tax implications to applicants.”
NARUC called on the Treasury Department and its Internal Revenue Service to rule on whether the grants are taxable. Taxing grant money given to awardees could undercut the projects’ budgets by 35 percent to 40 percent, NARUC said, and would add an extra level of undue hardship.
-
Artificial Intelligence3 months ago
U.S. Special Operations Command Employs AI and Machine Learning to Improve Operations
-
Broadband Roundup3 months ago
Benton on Middle Mile Open Access Networks, CENIC Fiber Route in California, Investors Buying Bitcoin
-
Section 2304 months ago
President Trump’s FCC Nominee Grilled on Section 230 During Senate Confirmation Hearing
-
Artificial Intelligence1 month ago
Artificial Intelligence Aims to Enhance Human Capabilities, But Only With Caution and Safeguards
-
Broadband Roundup3 months ago
Trump Signs Executive Order on Artificial Intelligence, How Not to Wreck the FCC, Broadband Performance in Europe
-
5G3 months ago
5G Stands to Impact Industry Before Consumers, Says Verizon CEO Hans Vestberg
-
Fiber2 months ago
Smaller Internet Providers Were Instrumental to Fiber Deployment in 2020, Says Fiber Broadband Association
-
#broadbandlive3 months ago
Broadband Breakfast Live Online Event Series on ‘Tools for Broadband Deployment’ on Enhancing Rural America