WASHINGTON, May 26, 2010 – A survey released today by the Federal Communications Commission found that one in six mobile users has been surprised by their unexpectedly high cell phone bill, an experience referred to as “bill shock.”
According to the survey, of these 30 million Americans who are “shocked,” 84 percent claimed their mobile carrier did not alert them that they were about to go over their limits on minutes, text messages and data downloads.
Joel Gurin, chief of the FCC Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau, said the message from this survey is that people still don’t know what they should in order to manage fees and billing issues.
The survey revealed that almost half of users who have plans with early termination fees aren't aware of the fees they will be charged should they terminate their plan.
The survey also found that only 36 percent of cell phone customers who are familiar with their bills said that the bills include “very clear” information on early termination fees. These fees are one factor the survey says can keep customers from switching mobile carriers, even if service is not ideal.
The FCC is concerned that only 58 percent of cell users in the survey said they were very satisfied with the number of places they can get a good signal.
Gurin said he was concerned about how widespread the lack of information is, but he couldn’t say whether rulemaking or voluntary legislation of this issue was the best way to handle this problem.
FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski said: “There is still more that can be done to help customers navigate what is sometimes a confusing marketplace.”
The survey also found that more than one-third of those people said their bills increased by at least $50, and 23 percent said the increase was $100 or more.
“As we know from our consumer complaint center, even an unexpected charge of $20 or $30 can make a difference to many people," said Gurin. "Several carriers are taking steps to make their fees and billing more transparent, and we would like this to become a universal practice. We’re confident that we will be able to work with both wireless carriers and public interest groups to help consumers avoid these unwelcome surprises.”
The survey, conducted by Abt/SRBI and Princeton Survey Research Associates International from April 19 to May 2, 2010, interviewed 3,005 American adults.
- Mobile Technology Aided the Growth of Black Lives Matter, But Will Hashtag Outrage Lead to Change?
- TikTok Ban Delayed as Wal-Mart Enters, FCC Says California Not Prepared for Auction, Wireless Facilities in Rights-of-Way
- Breakfast Media Minute: September 21, 2020
- At Rural Broadband Association NTCA, Pai Touts Improvements to Rural Broadband Auctions
- Democrats Lash at FCC Chairman Ajit Pai For Repealing Net Neutrality, Not Producing Broadband Maps
Signup for Broadband Breakfast
Fiber4 months ago
Fiber Networks Hold a Cybersecurity Advantage Over Rival Co-Axial and Wireless Technologies, Say Panelists
Congress4 months ago
Senators Introduce Healthcare Broadband Bill as House Companion, Proposes $2 Billion Telehealth Expansion
Artificial Intelligence3 months ago
Brookings Panelists Emphasize Importance of Addressing Biases in Artificial Intelligence Technology
China5 months ago
China Expert Predicts that Nation’s Flawed Coronavirus Response Will Damage the Power of Chinese Communist Party
Infrastructure6 months ago
Broadband Breakfast Live Online Will Stream Every Wednesday at 12 Noon ET on ‘Broadband and the Coronavirus’
Education6 months ago
Online Elementary Education is No Spring Break for Parents Teaching from Home
Artificial Intelligence3 months ago
U.S. State Department Employing Artificial Intelligence Against COVID-19 Misinformation
Rural5 months ago
Why the Rural Digital Opportunity Fund is So Significant, and How to Succeed in Applying For RDOF