WASHINGTON, June 25, 2010 – Britain’s Office of Communications (Ofcom) has begun a request of information about network neutrality. The office specifically citied the Comcast case and the actions being taken by the Federal Communication Commission as a contributing factor as to why they believe they must inquire about the issue.
Additionally the EU has given telecommunications regulators increased authority on broadband related issues which allows Ofcom to act on them.
‘New EU rules give regulators a clear responsibility to address the emerging issues around traffic management. The question is how Ofcom uses these and existing powers to further the interests of consumers, while supporting vibrant, innovative content production and network deployment,’ said Ofcom Chief Executive, Ed Richards.
Ofcom has released a 68 page report which outlines why they have deiced to look into the issue and asks a series of questions for which they would like responses from stakeholders. The questions mirror those being asked by the Federal Communications commission which as about discriminatory practices, and how network neutrality will affect innovation.
As part of their request for information Ofcom summarizes actions being taken by the FCC in the United States and also in the rest of Europe.
In Norway the communications authority setup an external working group which included major stakeholders to create a set of voluntary guidelines. These guidelines include giving users a predefined level of speed, the ability to connect any device and the use of any software on the network as long as it is non-harmful to the network and the guarantee of non-discrimination based upon the type of content.
In France the Autorité de Régulation des Communications Électroniques et des Poste (ARCEP) issued a set of guidelines similar to the Norwegian ones and the French Parliament has requested a report on the state of internet use which will be used to possibly formulate legislation.
Sweden’s Post and Telecom Agency has produced a report about the issue but the government has yet to act. The report concluded that effective competition ensures non-discrimination.
- Advocates for Antitrust Enforcement Say Consumer Welfare Standard Only One Layer of Competition Law
- In Law More Than a Year, MOBILE Now Advocates Say Act Requires Further Implementation for 5G Deployment
- Broadband Roundup: Texas Reaches T-Mobile Settlement, Closing the ‘Homework Gap,’ Broadcast Ownership
- UTOPIA Fiber Announces Completion of Latest Round of Funding, a $48 Million Network Expansion
- Prakash Sangam: China’s Huawei Clones Are Greater Threat to National Security than Huawei
Signup for Broadband Breakfast
Intellectual Property4 months ago
In Congressional Oversight Hearing, Register of Copyrights Says Office Is Responding to Online Users
Broadband Data6 months ago
California Report: Income Most Significant Factor in Low Broadband Adoption
Privacy and Security3 months ago
Comparing Privacy Policies for Wearable Fitness Trackers: Apple, Fitbit, Xiaomi and Under Armour
Antitrust3 months ago
Addressing the Impact of Big Data Upon Antitrust is More Complicated Than a Big Tech Breakup
Expert Opinion5 months ago
Geoff Mulligan: A ‘Dumb’ Way to Build Smart Cities
Antitrust3 months ago
Broadband Roundup: Everyone (Almost) Gangs Up on Google, Muni Broadband Fact Sheet, SHLB Anchornet Conference
Broadband Roundup4 months ago
Cable Industry Touts Energy Efficiency, Next Century Highlights Open Access Fiber, Aspen Forum Set
Broadband's Impact5 months ago
Law Enforcement and Advocates of Facial Recognition Technologies Battle Misconceptions