SAN FRANCISCO, September 2, 2010 — U.S. trade negotiators participating in talks with their European, Japanese and other other global counterparts blocked the online publication of the latest draft of a controversial anti-counterfeiting and piracy agreement after the latest round of meetings this August, according to a report from a European Union policy foundation.
The story, at EurActiv.com, quotes anonymous EU policy sources complaining that the American delegation had prevented EU officials from publishing the latest draft on an EU web site.
“If we want to be leaders in the EU on transparency, we really have to put more pressure on our partners to have more transparency,” an Austrian Green MEP told EurActiv.
“USTR supported release of a public text in April, and we joined all of the ACTA partners in announcing last month that the text will be public again before we sign. So the transparency is there,” responded Nefeterius McPherson, a spokeswoman for the United States Trade Representative. “Right now we are focused on the hard work of resolving the remaining issues so we can get to a final text.”
USTR representatives are aiming to finalize ACTA by the end of the year. President Obama pointed to work on the agreement earlier this year as a signal of the administration’s commitment to stringent intellectual property enforcement.
For the past two years, American technology companies and digital rights groups have been fretting over both the substance and process that’s unfurled over the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement. They’re unhappy about the secretive nature of the negotiations, and the proposal to implement America’s version of digital copyright infringement law, without any of its checks and balances, in Europe, Japan, South Korea and in many other signatory countries. (Without those checks, YouTube would have been on the hook for a billion dollars in the lawsuit launched by Viacom.)
The digital provisions of the agreement are just one portion of a much wider ranging agreement that aims to better crack down on the international trafficking of counterfeit goods, a burgeoning industry in of itself.
Negotiators met this August in Washington DC to further hammer out the agreement. The next meeting this month is in Japan.
- Evidence-Based Policy Making is Particularly Important in Managing Radio Frequency Spectrum
- Policymakers Urge Better Broadband Maps, Seek Funding for ‘Rip and Replace,’ and Tout Open Radio Networks
- Breakfast Media Minute: October 23, 2020
- Senate Judiciary Committee Subpoenas Tech Giants on Controversial Content, Also Advances Supreme Court Nominee
- Panelists at Tech Policy Institute Conference Tout American Approaches to EU Privacy Ambitions
Signup for Broadband Breakfast
Fiber5 months ago
Fiber Networks Hold a Cybersecurity Advantage Over Rival Co-Axial and Wireless Technologies, Say Panelists
Congress5 months ago
Senators Introduce Healthcare Broadband Bill as House Companion, Proposes $2 Billion Telehealth Expansion
Artificial Intelligence4 months ago
Brookings Panelists Emphasize Importance of Addressing Biases in Artificial Intelligence Technology
Broadband Roundup1 month ago
Nathan Simington is Trump’s New Man for FCC, New Speed Test, Challenges for State Net Neutrality
China6 months ago
China Expert Predicts that Nation’s Flawed Coronavirus Response Will Damage the Power of Chinese Communist Party
Rural6 months ago
Why the Rural Digital Opportunity Fund is So Significant, and How to Succeed in Applying For RDOF
Artificial Intelligence4 months ago
U.S. State Department Employing Artificial Intelligence Against COVID-19 Misinformation
Broadband's Impact3 months ago
Broadband Breakfast Live Online Launches Weekly Series Featuring ‘Champions of Broadband’