SAN FRANCISCO, Sept. 13, 2010 -- Microsoft on Monday reacted swiftly to a New York Times report that law enforcement authorities are abusing the company's anti-piracy campaign to squelch dissent by unilaterally issuing free licenses to non-profits operating around the world.
"Whatever the circumstances of the particular cases the New York Times described, we want to be clear that we unequivocally abhor any attempt to leverage intellectual property rights to stifle political advocacy or pursue improper personal gain," wrote Brad Smith, Microsoft's general counsel on the company's official blog on Monday morning.
Smith's reaction on Monday came after the Times reported that the law enforcement authorities in Russia had been abusing Microsoft's anti-piracy campaign for some time to squelch dissidents. The Times also reported that the dissidents and news outlets had appealed to Microsoft for help, but had received none.
Smith acted to reverse that situation Monday by issuing the free licenses, and hiring lawyers to conduct an investigation into the situation. He wrote that Microsoft is also consulting human rights organizations for advice, although he didn't name any.
Microsoft has been donating more than $390 million worth of software to more than 42,000 non-profits around the world, Smith noted on Microsoft's blog, but many non-profits don't know about the program, or don't know how to navigate a complicated process to obtain the software.
"We'll solve this problem by providing a unilateral NGO software license that runs automatically from Microsoft to NGOs and covers the software already installed on their PCs," Smith explained on the blog. "We'll make this new, non-transferable license applicable to NGOs in a number of countries, including Russia."
He added that Microsoft would also make those licenses available to "appropriate journalists' organizations in order to include small newspapers and independent media."
Microsoft is taking a number of other long-term steps to prevent the abuse of its anti-piracy campaign by creating a legal assistance program for the non-profits, but the immediate goal is to "exonerate" any qualifying group, he wrote.
Photo courtesy of Doc Searls.
- Partisan Disagreement Delays Broadband Funding That Might Come Through HEROES Act
- Gary Bolton: Under the Stress of COVID-19, the Networks That Held Fast Were Symmetrical Fiber Broadband
- Broadband is Vital to the Future of Sports, Says Owner of Washington Capitals and Wizards
- Amid Responses to Section 230 Executive Order, Trump-Twitter Dispute Over ‘Censorship’ Continues to Escalate
- Fiber Networks Hold a Cybersecurity Advantage Over Rival Co-Axial and Wireless Technologies, Say Panelists
Signup for Broadband Breakfast
Congress4 days ago
Senators Introduce Healthcare Broadband Bill as House Companion, Proposes $2 Billion Telehealth Expansion
China1 month ago
China Expert Predicts that Nation’s Flawed Coronavirus Response Will Damage the Power of Chinese Communist Party
Broadband Data1 month ago
CenturyLink CTO Boasts Success in Handling Coronavirus-Induced ‘Hot’ Networks, Credits Company’s Fiber Push
Big Tech3 weeks ago
The Rise, Reign, and Self-Repair of Zoom
#broadbandlive1 month ago
Broadband Breakfast Live Online on Wednesday, April 29, 2020 – Will the Coronavirus Lead to a Loss of Privacy? Weighing Contact Tracing and Broadband Surveillance
Net Neutrality1 month ago
Public Interest Groups Blast FCC For Refusal to Extend Public Safety Deadline on Net Neutrality Comments
Rural4 weeks ago
Why the Rural Digital Opportunity Fund is So Significant, and How to Succeed in Applying For RDOF
Broadband's Impact1 month ago
Artificial Intelligence Not Very Helpful in Addressing the Coronavirus, Say Experts on Brookings Panel