WASHINGTON, October 15, 2010 - Cablevision customers may be cut off from watching baseball in upcoming days if a business dispute between the cable company and a local broadcaster isn't resolved by midnight Friday.
The New York cable television company is once again fighting over the fees it must pay a broadcaster -- in this case Fox -- to provide the programming to its own customers.
Cable companies have been complaining that broadcasters have been holding them hostage and using high profile events such as this week-end's baseball playoffs to jack up their fees.
Broadcasters, for their part, say that their programming is worth significantly more than what the cable companies are paying for it.
Earlier this year, Time Warner Cable reached an agreement with Belo Corp. over this issue of retransmission consent fees. The two companies agreed on undisclosed terms for Belo's 12 stations around the country, as well as local news networks, according to a report in the trade magazine Broadcasting and Cable.
"This state of affairs is getting tiresome as these disputes grow more frequent," said Gigi Sohn, Public Knowledge's president and co-founder, who was one of the petitioners for a rule-making at the FCC to address the issue earlier this year. "It is because of situations like this that Public Knowledge joined 13 other parties in March to ask the FCC to consider changing the rules governing the terms and conditions under which broadcast stations are carried on cable networks."
The petition proposes that the broadcasters should continue to allow the cable companies to carry their signals even after the contracts between the two sides have expired as the two sides negotiate, among other things.
Cablevision, along with Time Warner Cable, and the American Cable Association were among the 13 petitioners.
For a review of the issues at stake, and what the companies' lobbyists are arguing in policy circles in Washington, DC, readers can refer to the Intellectual Property Breakfast Club's event video from this June.
- Advocates for Antitrust Enforcement Say Consumer Welfare Standard Only One Layer of Competition Law
- In Law More Than a Year, MOBILE Now Advocates Say Act Requires Further Implementation for 5G Deployment
- Broadband Roundup: Texas Reaches T-Mobile Settlement, Closing the ‘Homework Gap,’ Broadcast Ownership
- UTOPIA Fiber Announces Completion of Latest Round of Funding, a $48 Million Network Expansion
- Prakash Sangam: China’s Huawei Clones Are Greater Threat to National Security than Huawei
Signup for Broadband Breakfast
Intellectual Property4 months ago
In Congressional Oversight Hearing, Register of Copyrights Says Office Is Responding to Online Users
Broadband Data6 months ago
California Report: Income Most Significant Factor in Low Broadband Adoption
Privacy and Security3 months ago
Comparing Privacy Policies for Wearable Fitness Trackers: Apple, Fitbit, Xiaomi and Under Armour
Antitrust3 months ago
Addressing the Impact of Big Data Upon Antitrust is More Complicated Than a Big Tech Breakup
Expert Opinion5 months ago
Geoff Mulligan: A ‘Dumb’ Way to Build Smart Cities
Antitrust3 months ago
Broadband Roundup: Everyone (Almost) Gangs Up on Google, Muni Broadband Fact Sheet, SHLB Anchornet Conference
Broadband Roundup4 months ago
Cable Industry Touts Energy Efficiency, Next Century Highlights Open Access Fiber, Aspen Forum Set
Broadband's Impact5 months ago
Law Enforcement and Advocates of Facial Recognition Technologies Battle Misconceptions