WASHINGTON, October 5, 2010 - Consumers are willing to pay a large amount to upgrade their internet access speeds from slow to fast, but are more reluctant to upgrade from fast to super-fast, according to a research paper discussed at the Telecommunications Policy Research Conference last week.
Gregory Rosston of Stanford University discussed research addressing the value of consumers' high speed internet access. Consumers are as greatly interested in reliability as they are in speed, he said. The research also found that experienced users are much more willing to pay for higher speeds while inexperienced users are willing to pay for basic access. Additionally, consumers are willing to pay for high-speed access but demand reliability over a super-fast speed.
A separate panel addressed issues surrounding network neutrality compared policies in the United States, Japan and the European Union. In the United States, there is limited competition with weak governmental authority in enforcing network neutrality principles, and there have been a number of infractions. Japan in contrast has a high level of competition at the service level and the government has put in place some non-binding principles.
Several corporate players in the media and communications industries have come together to agree on a set of rules governing net neutrality. it is important to note however that the nation's largest internet service provider is the government-supported NTT. There have not yet been any network neutrality infractions. The European Union is unique in that it has strong competition amongst ISPs, a high level of government authority over the telecommunications sector and there have been infractions. The infractions however were privately resolved without the intervention of the government. The researchers concluded that competition prevents infractions but competition is unable to determine the necessary level of competition.
A broadband investment panel looked at how investment will proceed now that increasing capacity costs more than earlier investments. Broadband investment is a long and expensive process that appears to be declining. Verizon has announced that it will slow down its FIOS deployment. A paper by Bob Atkinson, Eli Noam, and Ivy Schultz from Columbia University shows that future investment will most likely be in wireless technologies due to their beneficial cost-to-coverage ratio.
- FCC Takes Two Actions Promoting Spectrum Sharing, Also Implements 988 as Suicide Hotline
- Telephony Industry Rises to the Challenge of Robocalls, With Legislation, Regulation and Enforcement Close Behind
- Lifeline Remains the Best Method for Connecting All Americans, Says FCC’s Geoffrey Starks
- Connectivity and Mobility Are Key Pillars of Metropolitan Development, Say Congresswomen at Smart City Event
- Lawmakers, Prosecutors and Big Tech Companies Spar at Senate Hearing Over Unlocking Encryption
Signup for Broadband Breakfast
5G3 months ago
Broadband Roundup: CBRS on a Roll, Innovation Fund in Rural California, Another Verizon 5G Announcement
Antitrust2 months ago
Broadband Roundup: Comcast vs. Google, Sprint’s Open 5G Network, Ransomware Rises
Spectrum2 months ago
Wireless Internet Providers Excited About Multiple Spectrum Sharing Opportunities, Including FCC Priority Access
Net Neutrality2 months ago
D.C. Circuit’s Decision in Net Neutrality Case Likely to Open New Fronts of Attack Against FCC
5G2 months ago
Questions of Public vs. Private Auction and Role of 5G Spectrum Dominate Conference on C-Band
Tribal Broadband3 months ago
Wireless Broadband Likely to be a Key Component in Getting Broadband to Tribal Country
National Broadband Plan2 months ago
Sanders, Warren and Buttigieg: Democratic Presidential Candidates With a Broadband Plan
China3 weeks ago
Prakash Sangam: China’s Huawei Clones Are Greater Threat to National Security than Huawei