A reknowned hacker and 21-year-old whiz kid who was the first to unlock an iPhone says in a Thursday cable television interview that Sony’s lawsuit against him for his latest Sony PlayStation 3 hack only serves to highlight the absurdity of a landmark digital copyright law.
Speaking on G4 television Thursday, George Hotz wondered why it's legal to hack, or jail-break Apple's iPhone, but not Sony's PlayStation 3.
"I think this case is about a lot more than what I did and me," he told G4 Attack of the Show's host Kevin Pereira. "It's about whether you really own that device that you purchased."
"Currently, the difference is that the [Digital Millennium Copyright Act] says specifically mobile phones, but I think the same precedent should apply to whatever closed system [there is] where the manufacturers controls all the software that runs on it … if you can jailbreak one closed system, why can’t you jailbreak another?" he asked.
Hotz published the code for his hack on his web site last week. The code enables people to run third-party applications or pirated games on the PlayStation 3.
He said that he doesn't support piracy, and that he tried to make it so that his hack wouldn't support pirated games.
“I made a specific effort while I was working on this to try to enable homebrew without enabling things I do not support, like piracy,” he told Pereira.
Sony responded with a lawsuit filed in the Northern District of California Tuesday, asking a judge for the removal of the code and the confiscation of Hotz's computer equipment.
A hearing over the issue is scheduled to take place today at 9 a.m.
Hotz's lawyer told the judge in a Thursday filing that the procedure is pointless because the code has already spread across the internet.
Last July, the U.S. Copyright Office explicitly exempted iPhone application developers and anyone else from being sued for breaking through the encryption on the iPhone’s operating system in order to run third party applications not approved by iPhone maker Apple.
Under the DMCA it can be a civil and criminal offense to traffic in devices that can break through digital locks.
The U.S. Copyright Office revisits the issue every three years and considers new situations and grants new exceptions to the anti-circumvention rule as specifics are presented to the office for rule-making.
- Registration Available for Rural Broadband Track at Broadband Communities Summit from April 27-30, 2020
- Broadband Roundup: The Future of Work and Minorities, State Broadband Officials Meet at Pew, NYC’s Open Access Plan
- FCC and FTC Commissioners Address ‘Technology Optimism and Pessimism’ at Silicon Flatirons Conference
- At Silicon Flatirons on Monday, Panelists Differ on the Real Value of the Internet
- Drones Will Need Access to 5G Services to Put Out Forest Fires and Do More Advanced Tasks
Signup for Broadband Breakfast
Broadband Data9 months ago
Pennsylvania Broadband Speeds Worse Than Previously Believed, According to State Report
Intellectual Property7 months ago
In Congressional Oversight Hearing, Register of Copyrights Says Office Is Responding to Online Users
Broadband Data8 months ago
California Report: Income Most Significant Factor in Low Broadband Adoption
Broadband Roundup6 months ago
Cable Industry Touts Energy Efficiency, Next Century Highlights Open Access Fiber, Aspen Forum Set
FCC10 years ago
Telecom Companies Are Using Fight Interrupting Oscar Ceremony Broadcast To Manipulate Public and FCC, Argue Broadcasters
Privacy and Security5 months ago
Comparing Privacy Policies for Wearable Fitness Trackers: Apple, Fitbit, Xiaomi and Under Armour
Open Access2 months ago
UTOPIA Fiber: A Model Open-Access Network
Antitrust5 months ago
Addressing the Impact of Big Data Upon Antitrust is More Complicated Than a Big Tech Breakup