Washington, January 24, 2011 – Verizon Communications filed a federal lawsuit Thursday, challenging the Federal Communications Commission's recent Open Internet Order.
Verizon argued that the FCC does not have the authority to implement the new rules. The Order, which was handed down from the Commission but has not yet taken effect provides three guidelines by which internet service providers (ISPs) must abide in their offerings to consumers. First, the Commission said, ISPs must provide services in a transparent manner by disclosing their network management practices and performance characteristics. Second, network providers must not block lawful content from their customers, and third, providers may not unreasonably discriminate by prioritizing certain network traffic without sufficient reason.
Verizon based the appeal on its existing spectrum license, which it contends would be modified by the Open Internet Order. That order, the company alleges, would implement changes that are in excess of the FCC’s authority and are contrary to the company's constitutional rights. The appeal does not state which constitutional rights would be violated by enforcement of the Order.
Verizon's appeal harkens to Comcast's allegations in its successful suit against the FCC, which was decided last year. In Comcast v. FCC, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, ruled in favor of Comcast when it challenged the FCC’s authority to enforce its net neutrality principles against the company.
Comcast also promises to weigh heavily on Verizon's appeal - or so Verizon apparently hopes. The company seems to have begun to draw the two cases together from the outset. Verizon not only filed its appeal with the D.C. Circuit, but then moved to assign the case to the same panel of judges that decided Comcast. Additionally, Verizon’s lead attorney, Helgi Walker of D.C. law firm, Wiley Rein LLP, represented Comcast in its case against the Commission.
“Verizon has the legal right to do this, but we are disappointed that they filed suit,” said Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA), ranking member of the House Energy and Commerce Committee and Sen. John Rockefeller (D-WV), Chair of the Senate Commerce Committee in a joint statement. Both legislators are supporters of net neutrality and have defended the Open Internet Order.
“We support the FCC’s efforts because they will protect consumers and provide companies with the certainty they need to make investments in our growing digital economy.”
- Broadband Roundup: Trump’s Media Bias Panel, Facebook Shops, Virtual Private Networks in Hong Kong
- Senators Introduce Healthcare Broadband Bill as House Companion, Proposes $2 Billion Telehealth Expansion
- Kurt Schaubach: The Top 5 Benefits of Shared Spectrum for Cable Operators
- Slogans About Data Portability on Tech Platforms Don’t Capture Intellectual Property and Interoperability Issues
- Application Deadline of July 15 Announced for $16 Billion Rural Digital Opportunity Fund Auction
Signup for Broadband Breakfast
China4 weeks ago
China Expert Predicts that Nation’s Flawed Coronavirus Response Will Damage the Power of Chinese Communist Party
Broadband Data1 month ago
CenturyLink CTO Boasts Success in Handling Coronavirus-Induced ‘Hot’ Networks, Credits Company’s Fiber Push
Big Tech3 weeks ago
The Rise, Reign, and Self-Repair of Zoom
Net Neutrality1 month ago
Public Interest Groups Blast FCC For Refusal to Extend Public Safety Deadline on Net Neutrality Comments
#broadbandlive4 weeks ago
Broadband Breakfast Live Online on Wednesday, April 29, 2020 – Will the Coronavirus Lead to a Loss of Privacy? Weighing Contact Tracing and Broadband Surveillance
Broadband's Impact1 month ago
Artificial Intelligence Not Very Helpful in Addressing the Coronavirus, Say Experts on Brookings Panel
Rural3 weeks ago
Why the Rural Digital Opportunity Fund is So Significant, and How to Succeed in Applying For RDOF
Fiber3 weeks ago
Fiber Optics Generally a Better Option Than Wireless, Even in Rural Areas, Says Municipal Broadband Advocate