WASHINGTON March 29, 2011 - With the acquisition of T-Mobile, AT&T may be not only solving a long standing question about where it would find the spectrum to deploy its planned 4G network, but also make a leap in its public image.
Currently, AT&T uses a band of spectrum not supported by any other carrier in the world, meaning handsets must be specially made for the carrier. Both T-Mobile and AT&T use the same base technology, but the two carriers run their 3G networks on different bands of spectrum. The acquisition of T-Mobile would greatly increase the amount of spectrum and infrastructure that AT&T would possess, bringing service to a greater number of Americans.
For example, T-Mobile is currently far ahead of AT&T on building HSPA+, an intermediate 4G technology that fits right between the carriers' existing 3G networks and Long Term Evolution (LTE) technology. Immediately, AT&T would be able to improve it’s current 3G speed and coverage by redeploying the infrastructure to speed up and widen its 3G coverage.
Long term, AT&T has focused on building its next-generation LTE infrastructure, but has fallen behind Verizon in actually deploying the technology. If the T-Mobile acquisition goes forward, AT&T would be able to re allocate the spectrum it acquires from T-Mobile and expand its LTE service more rapidly, closing the gap that Verizon is currently widening.
AT&T confirmed this plan in a call with investors following the announcement of the potential acquisition. The company's roadmap calls for eventually moving T-Mobile’s subscribers off the 1700 megahertz 3G spectrum they currently occupy. AT&T will then combine this spectrum with other availible spectrum it already owns to make LTE service available to an estimated 95 percent of Americans. The projected roadmap calls for this network to be fully in place by 2013, making the deal imperative to AT&T's competitiveness, as spectrum is a large part of what has been missing from the carrier's past plans.
Spectrum, therefore, is the keystone to AT&T’s future. The company's plan to acquire T-Mobile utilizes the current assets T-Mobile possesses that will improve and expand AT&T's network and give a definite shape shape to it’s future plans. AT&T suffered blows to its public image in the last year from numerous directions: losing iPhone exclusivity, the unpopular introduction of capped data plans, and repeated issues with call reliability. The acquisition of T-Mobile would allow AT&T to cultivate an image of a faster, newer network with a larger amount of available spectrum, possibly placing it ahead of its closest competitor Verizon.
Although he declined to comment specifically on the deal, FCC chairman, Julius Genachowski, echoed his long held sentiment about the importance of spectrum while at the CTIA Wireless trade show in Orlando last week: “Spectrum is the oxygen that allows all of these mobile innovations to breathe. Whether or not most Americans know the physics of spectrum, they know what it feels like to have a dropped call or a slow connection or cranky Wi-Fi."
And it looks like that is what this deal is about: AT&T’s need for more spectrum both technologically and in the public perception.
- The California Consumer Privacy Act Lets People Know What Information is Collected, But Can’t Stop It
- FCC Chairman Ajit Pai Announces Public Auction of C-Band, Connecticut Peels Back Broadband Barriers
- Commerce Department Extends Huawei Temporary General License For 90 Days
- T-Mobile’s Acquisition of Sprint Passes Federal Muster, But 16 States Press On in Opposition
- Comcast Touts 100 Gigabit Service, SHLB Seeks Reconsideration on Telehealth, Senate Clears Emergency Communications
Signup for Broadband Breakfast
Intellectual Property4 months ago
In Congressional Oversight Hearing, Register of Copyrights Says Office Is Responding to Online Users
Broadband Data5 months ago
California Report: Income Most Significant Factor in Low Broadband Adoption
Broadband Data6 months ago
Pennsylvania Broadband Speeds Worse Than Previously Believed, According to State Report
Antitrust2 months ago
Addressing the Impact of Big Data Upon Antitrust is More Complicated Than a Big Tech Breakup
Privacy and Security3 months ago
Comparing Privacy Policies for Wearable Fitness Trackers: Apple, Fitbit, Xiaomi and Under Armour
Expert Opinion4 months ago
Geoff Mulligan: A ‘Dumb’ Way to Build Smart Cities
Antitrust2 months ago
Broadband Roundup: Everyone (Almost) Gangs Up on Google, Muni Broadband Fact Sheet, SHLB Anchornet Conference
Broadband Roundup3 months ago
Cable Industry Touts Energy Efficiency, Next Century Highlights Open Access Fiber, Aspen Forum Set