Apple Inc. on Friday sued Amazon.com for trademark infringement just before the giant online retailer launched its mobile 'appstore' to sell software applications for Android devices.
Amazon.com launched its new mobile applications store for the Android platform on Tuesday. It's called the Amazon Appstore.
The company is bringing its vast experience with consumer retailing and applying it to the business of selling software both online and through mobile devices.
Many of the software programs available through Amazon.com's Appstore are very similar to the ones available through Apple's iOS, and thus could make using an Android device almost indistinguishable from an iPhone -- although Amazon is offering a distinct new feature called Test Drive, which allows users to try out an App before they buy it.
Amazon's advantage also is that it already has a large established user base of customers whose buying and payment account information they already have, and which they can integrate into this new platform.
Friday's suit was filed in federal district court in the Northern District of California.
“Amazon has begun improperly using Apple’s App Store mark in connection with Amazon’s mobile-software developer program,” Apple's lawyers said in the complaint.
Apple first applied for the trademark on the term "App Store" in 2008. The USPTO has since granted it.
In January, Microsoft challenged Apple's trademarking of the term in a proceeding at the USPTO.
The company charges that the term 'App Store' is too generic to be trademarked.
Many other companies, such as Google, Research in Motion, Nokia, Hewlett Packard and Palm and Samsung describe their mobile stores for software as "app stores," Microsoft notes.
Apple fired back in a filing earlier this month saying that Microsoft's argument relies on "out of context" snippets of information, and that if the USPTO agrees with Microsoft, it would have to revoke numerous other kinds of trademarks it has granted in other industries.
- FCC Chairman Ajit Pai Announces Public Auction of C-Band, Connecticut Peels Back Broadband Barriers
- Commerce Department Extends Huawei Temporary General License For 90 Days
- T-Mobile’s Acquisition of Sprint Passes Federal Muster, But 16 States Press On in Opposition
- Comcast Touts 100 Gigabit Service, SHLB Seeks Reconsideration on Telehealth, Senate Clears Emergency Communications
- As Next Year’s C-Band Auction Looms, FCC Officials Reflect on Innovation in Spectrum Auctions
Signup for Broadband Breakfast
Intellectual Property4 months ago
In Congressional Oversight Hearing, Register of Copyrights Says Office Is Responding to Online Users
Broadband Data5 months ago
California Report: Income Most Significant Factor in Low Broadband Adoption
Broadband Data6 months ago
Pennsylvania Broadband Speeds Worse Than Previously Believed, According to State Report
Antitrust2 months ago
Addressing the Impact of Big Data Upon Antitrust is More Complicated Than a Big Tech Breakup
Privacy and Security2 months ago
Comparing Privacy Policies for Wearable Fitness Trackers: Apple, Fitbit, Xiaomi and Under Armour
Expert Opinion4 months ago
Geoff Mulligan: A ‘Dumb’ Way to Build Smart Cities
Antitrust2 months ago
Broadband Roundup: Everyone (Almost) Gangs Up on Google, Muni Broadband Fact Sheet, SHLB Anchornet Conference
Broadband Roundup3 months ago
Cable Industry Touts Energy Efficiency, Next Century Highlights Open Access Fiber, Aspen Forum Set