WASHINGTON, March 11, 2011 - Legislators in the House and Senate introduced companion bills that would prohibit states from levying new taxes specific to wireless services in an effort to keep barriers to access for mobile internet services low.
The Wireless Tax Fairness Act would impose a five-year moratorium on new discriminatory taxes on wireless services. The bills garnered bipartisan support in both the House and the Senate. Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR) and Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-ME) introduced the Senate version, while Rep. Trent Franks (R-AZ) and Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) introduced the bill to the House.
In a statement Thursday, the legislators expressed concern that with the growth in wireless services, the majority of states have imposed taxes on those services that exceed local sales tax rates. Some cash-strapped states have even imposed wireless taxes at rates that exceed those on luxury and vice goods and services. Those higher taxes -which on average more than double those of other goods and services - will raise the cost to consumers and create disincentives for companies to invest in wireless technologies, say the lawmakers.
"Our policies should be encouraging new innovations in these technologies not holding them back," said Sen. Wyden through the statement. "Without action, states and local governments may tack wireless services with so many taxes that innovation and deployment of new technology and investment are simply not lucrative."
The introduction of the bills drew the approval of the wireless industry as well.
"The Wireless Tax Fairness Act and its five-year ‘timeout’ on new, discriminatory taxes would protect customers from new financial burdens that discourage their use of the wireless technologies that are so integral to our lives," said Peter Davidson, Verizon senior vice president of federal government relations. "In this fragile economic recovery, now is not the time to impose new taxes that will make mobile broadband connections less affordable for consumers, stifle e-commerce and hinder high-tech innovation."
- Broadband Roundup: Mayor Pete Makes Trillion-Dollar Infrastructure Bid, USDA ReConnect Grants Announced, US Telecom and Robocalls
- Panelists Call Federal Privacy Legislation Necessary and Express Optimism Toward That Goal
- U.S., Australian and British Law Enforcement and High Tech Advocates Debate Access to Encryption
- State of the Net Panelists Fiercely Defend Section 230 as a Crucial Protection of Free Speech
- The Biggest Tech Companies – Amazon, Apple, Facebook and Google – Have Nowhere to Go But Down, Say Panelists
Signup for Broadband Breakfast
Broadband Data8 months ago
Pennsylvania Broadband Speeds Worse Than Previously Believed, According to State Report
Broadband Data7 months ago
California Report: Income Most Significant Factor in Low Broadband Adoption
Intellectual Property6 months ago
In Congressional Oversight Hearing, Register of Copyrights Says Office Is Responding to Online Users
Privacy and Security5 months ago
Comparing Privacy Policies for Wearable Fitness Trackers: Apple, Fitbit, Xiaomi and Under Armour
FCC10 years ago
Telecom Companies Are Using Fight Interrupting Oscar Ceremony Broadcast To Manipulate Public and FCC, Argue Broadcasters
Antitrust5 months ago
Addressing the Impact of Big Data Upon Antitrust is More Complicated Than a Big Tech Breakup
Expert Opinion7 months ago
Geoff Mulligan: A ‘Dumb’ Way to Build Smart Cities
Broadband's Impact10 years ago
Make No Mistake: Internet Content Subscription Models will come!