WASHINGTON, March 11, 2011 - Legislators in the House and Senate introduced companion bills that would prohibit states from levying new taxes specific to wireless services in an effort to keep barriers to access for mobile internet services low.
The Wireless Tax Fairness Act would impose a five-year moratorium on new discriminatory taxes on wireless services. The bills garnered bipartisan support in both the House and the Senate. Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR) and Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-ME) introduced the Senate version, while Rep. Trent Franks (R-AZ) and Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) introduced the bill to the House.
In a statement Thursday, the legislators expressed concern that with the growth in wireless services, the majority of states have imposed taxes on those services that exceed local sales tax rates. Some cash-strapped states have even imposed wireless taxes at rates that exceed those on luxury and vice goods and services. Those higher taxes -which on average more than double those of other goods and services - will raise the cost to consumers and create disincentives for companies to invest in wireless technologies, say the lawmakers.
"Our policies should be encouraging new innovations in these technologies not holding them back," said Sen. Wyden through the statement. "Without action, states and local governments may tack wireless services with so many taxes that innovation and deployment of new technology and investment are simply not lucrative."
The introduction of the bills drew the approval of the wireless industry as well.
"The Wireless Tax Fairness Act and its five-year ‘timeout’ on new, discriminatory taxes would protect customers from new financial burdens that discourage their use of the wireless technologies that are so integral to our lives," said Peter Davidson, Verizon senior vice president of federal government relations. "In this fragile economic recovery, now is not the time to impose new taxes that will make mobile broadband connections less affordable for consumers, stifle e-commerce and hinder high-tech innovation."
- Advocates for Antitrust Enforcement Say Consumer Welfare Standard Only One Layer of Competition Law
- In Law More Than a Year, MOBILE Now Advocates Say Act Requires Further Implementation for 5G Deployment
- Broadband Roundup: Texas Reaches T-Mobile Settlement, Closing the ‘Homework Gap,’ Broadcast Ownership
- UTOPIA Fiber Announces Completion of Latest Round of Funding, a $48 Million Network Expansion
- Prakash Sangam: China’s Huawei Clones Are Greater Threat to National Security than Huawei
Signup for Broadband Breakfast
Intellectual Property4 months ago
In Congressional Oversight Hearing, Register of Copyrights Says Office Is Responding to Online Users
Broadband Data6 months ago
California Report: Income Most Significant Factor in Low Broadband Adoption
Privacy and Security3 months ago
Comparing Privacy Policies for Wearable Fitness Trackers: Apple, Fitbit, Xiaomi and Under Armour
Antitrust3 months ago
Addressing the Impact of Big Data Upon Antitrust is More Complicated Than a Big Tech Breakup
Expert Opinion5 months ago
Geoff Mulligan: A ‘Dumb’ Way to Build Smart Cities
Antitrust3 months ago
Broadband Roundup: Everyone (Almost) Gangs Up on Google, Muni Broadband Fact Sheet, SHLB Anchornet Conference
Broadband Roundup4 months ago
Cable Industry Touts Energy Efficiency, Next Century Highlights Open Access Fiber, Aspen Forum Set
Broadband's Impact5 months ago
Law Enforcement and Advocates of Facial Recognition Technologies Battle Misconceptions