WASHINGTON, April 5, 2011 - The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit dismissed a suit Monday seeking to overturn the Federal Communications Commission's recent net neutrality rules, finding that the appellants in the case filed their appeal prematurely.
The appeal challenged the FCC's authority to institute the Open Internet Order it issued in December. Appellants Verizon and Metro PCS argued that the FCC's new rules would, if instituted, impermissibly modify the terms of their wireless spectrum licenses.
The Order, which the Commission passed by a 3-2 vote in December of last year, provides three guidelines by which Internet Service Providers (ISPs) must abide in their offerings to consumers. First, ISPs must provide services in a transparent manner by disclosing their network management practices and performance characteristics. Second, network providers must not block lawful content from their customers, and third, providers may not unreasonably discriminate by prioritizing certain network traffic without sufficient reason.
The D.C. Circuit - the court that last year struck down the FCC's attempt to impose net neutrality rules on Comcast - did not reach the merits of the arguments in dismissing the case. Rather, the court shot down the carriers' efforts to block implementation of the net neutrality rules on the procedural basis that the companies filed their appeals too early.
Parties may not file appeals to FCC rules until those rules are published in the Federal Register. Though the Commission voted on the Order in December, it still has not appeared in the Federal Register.
The dismissal leaves both carriers the option of refiling their actions once the rules have been published.
Verizon spokesman, Ed McFadden, chalked the dismissal up to an ambiguity in the Commission's rules for filing appeals.
"This is one more procedural step," said McFadden on Monday. "We wanted to make sure we preserved and protected our rights, so we filed [the appeal] immediately. When the rules are published in the Federal Register, we will refile."
- At Silicon Flatirons, UN Representative Says World Must Stand By Twitter in Battle of Intimidation with Trump
- Partisan Disagreement Delays Broadband Funding That Might Come Through HEROES Act
- Gary Bolton: Under the Stress of COVID-19, the Networks That Held Fast Were Symmetrical Fiber Broadband
- Broadband is Vital to the Future of Sports, Says Owner of Washington Capitals and Wizards
- Amid Responses to Section 230 Executive Order, Trump-Twitter Dispute Over ‘Censorship’ Continues to Escalate
Signup for Broadband Breakfast
Congress5 days ago
Senators Introduce Healthcare Broadband Bill as House Companion, Proposes $2 Billion Telehealth Expansion
China1 month ago
China Expert Predicts that Nation’s Flawed Coronavirus Response Will Damage the Power of Chinese Communist Party
Broadband Data1 month ago
CenturyLink CTO Boasts Success in Handling Coronavirus-Induced ‘Hot’ Networks, Credits Company’s Fiber Push
Big Tech3 weeks ago
The Rise, Reign, and Self-Repair of Zoom
#broadbandlive1 month ago
Broadband Breakfast Live Online on Wednesday, April 29, 2020 – Will the Coronavirus Lead to a Loss of Privacy? Weighing Contact Tracing and Broadband Surveillance
Net Neutrality1 month ago
Public Interest Groups Blast FCC For Refusal to Extend Public Safety Deadline on Net Neutrality Comments
Rural4 weeks ago
Why the Rural Digital Opportunity Fund is So Significant, and How to Succeed in Applying For RDOF
Broadband's Impact1 month ago
Artificial Intelligence Not Very Helpful in Addressing the Coronavirus, Say Experts on Brookings Panel