WASHINGTON, February 8, 2013 - The Federal Communications Commission is not able to flexibly adapt to changed circumstances in the communications world, according to officials participating in a January 30 panel on here the transition to internet protocol networks.
With the topic in hand of the “retirement” of traditional copper wiress, and the regulatory paradigm that has governed them, AT&T Senior Executive Vice President James W. Cicconi called on the FCC to re-asses existing regulations concerning existing networks – as well as rules governing wireless frequencies.
As the world we live in grows increasingly reliant on broadband and internet communications, the public switched telephone network – also know as the PSTN -- is slowly becoming obsolete, Cicconi said. However, the FCC still requires the regulation of major telephone companies like AT&T.
In December 2012, the FCC established the Technology Transitions Policy Task Force, whose stated goal was to “best ensure that our nation’s communications policies continue to drive a virtuous cycle of innovation and investment, promote competition, and protect consumers.” Some believe that it is vital for the FCC and this task force to set an immediate date to complete the transition to internet-protocol networks.
Cicconi said, for example, that only 30 percent of AT&T customers currently used wired lines. (The rest have flocked to wireless communications ) Yet FCC regulations require providers to invest in wired technology. It’s gotten to the point that many citizens are now choosing to use the wireless line as their primary telephone while saving money to cut the cord on their wired telephone.
Another FCC critic was the Institute for Policy Innovation. In a January letter to the FCC, the think tank chastised the FCC: “it borders on the absurd to require that companies like AT&T maintain two parallel networks, a forward looking one that is desired by consumers and businesses and that facilitates new products and services using the latest technology; but also an expensive legacy network that is necessary only to comply with outdated regulations.”
“It is vital for the FCC, for its own future relevance, to tackle this, tackle it today, and re-asses the basis on which it regulates,” said Cicconi to the crowd gathered by the McDonough School of Business at Georgetown University’s Center for Business and Public Policy.
John Mayo, executive director of the center, echoed Cicconi's statements. Mayo compared the FCC's forcing of telecommunications divisions to invest in old technology to requiring of making modern auto makers invest in “buggy whips.”
By pointing out the FCC's inability to adapt to a wireless world, Cicconi criticized the commission and governing bodies for attempting to re-word old rules and regulations into a new world. He stated that “they have struggled with how to figure out how to preserve rules and transport them into a new environment.” The next step is to “take all these rules and design them for an world,” said Cicconi.
Blair Levin of the Aspen Institute stated similarly that “there is no need to wait” and that the transition to IP is an inevitable reality. Levin said that by waiting on completely embracing a wireless transition, potential jobs could be lost. Jennifer Fritzsche, a managing director for Wells Fargo, cited a recent company survey that expressed the inancial hesitance of bankers to invest in the changing regularly climate. According to this survey, 86 percent of those asked on Wall Street believe that the Obama administration was more regulatory in regard to business than was prior administrations.
Cicconi echoed the need for “new rules” concerning how the private sectors are to invest and operate the space. Cicconi backed up his companies desire to abandon what he called “legacy rules” by noting that “five years ago we [AT&T] were selling minutes, now we are selling bits.”
Ciconni later wondered aloud to the crowd, “how many other companies as large as ours, have fundamentally changed, in only five years, the core product they sell and how they sell it, this is the a pace of change and how we grasp it.” Without embracing that need for change, the majority of the panel concluded, that the FCC could become irrelevant as the world continues to embrace wireless and broadband technologies.
- Advocates for Antitrust Enforcement Say Consumer Welfare Standard Only One Layer of Competition Law
- In Law More Than a Year, MOBILE Now Advocates Say Act Requires Further Implementation for 5G Deployment
- Broadband Roundup: Texas Reaches T-Mobile Settlement, Closing the ‘Homework Gap,’ Broadcast Ownership
- UTOPIA Fiber Announces Completion of Latest Round of Funding, a $48 Million Network Expansion
- Prakash Sangam: China’s Huawei Clones Are Greater Threat to National Security than Huawei
Signup for Broadband Breakfast
Intellectual Property4 months ago
In Congressional Oversight Hearing, Register of Copyrights Says Office Is Responding to Online Users
Broadband Data6 months ago
California Report: Income Most Significant Factor in Low Broadband Adoption
Privacy and Security3 months ago
Comparing Privacy Policies for Wearable Fitness Trackers: Apple, Fitbit, Xiaomi and Under Armour
Antitrust3 months ago
Addressing the Impact of Big Data Upon Antitrust is More Complicated Than a Big Tech Breakup
Expert Opinion5 months ago
Geoff Mulligan: A ‘Dumb’ Way to Build Smart Cities
Antitrust3 months ago
Broadband Roundup: Everyone (Almost) Gangs Up on Google, Muni Broadband Fact Sheet, SHLB Anchornet Conference
Broadband Roundup4 months ago
Cable Industry Touts Energy Efficiency, Next Century Highlights Open Access Fiber, Aspen Forum Set
Broadband's Impact5 months ago
Law Enforcement and Advocates of Facial Recognition Technologies Battle Misconceptions