WASHINGTON, September 3, 2014 - Communications network consumers have more choices than ever today, and according to an Internet Innovation Alliance study, policymakers should be careful not to invoke broad regulation on a technology platform or service basis.
Less regulated wireless voice service is favored in eight times as many households as the most regulated landline option when a single service is relied upon, the 36-page study found.
“With the old network compact, regulators were in charge, but the new reality is that consumers are in control,” said Anna-Maria Kovacs, a policy scholar and communications industry analyst, who authored the study, released in late July by the pro-industry advocacy group.
Whereas 94 percent of households in 1996 subscribed to plain old telephone service (the most regulated voice service), only 5 percent still rely exclusively on it. Consumers today are subscribing to a variety of different internet platforms. A total of 62 percent subscribe to mobile, 22 percent to cable, 8 percent to wireline DSL, 7 percent to wireline fiber, and 1 percent to fixed wireless or satellite.
Consumers are also picking from many different kinds of video providers: wired cable (48 percent), broadcast (10 percent), telco (10 percent), satellite (31 percent) and broadband only (1 percent).
Given this multitude of options for consumers, Kovacs said, a new network compact has to be formed that only specifically regulates areas where consumer needs aren't met by the market.
“Because consumers today don’t have to purchase what regulators design and a monopolist provides, they can’t be treated as a homogeneous body without choices; a ‘one size fits all’ solution is no longer viable,” added Kovacs. “Amidst extensive and varied competition, providers survive only if they give consumers what consumers want. Otherwise, consumers move to competing providers and take their spending and the associated earnings with them. Cross-subsidies don’t work, because consumers can flee the subsidizing services. Regulators can limit providers’ earnings on the upside but can’t protect the downside.”
Rick Boucher, honorary chairman of the innovation alliance, said reiterated Kovac's claims: “The 21st century challenge of regulators in preserving and advancing the core values must take into consideration new platforms and the plethora of consumer choices.”
- CBRS Crucial Amid Coronavirus Pandemic, Says ConnectX
- EARN IT Act, Impacting Section 230, Advances in Senate with New Encryption Amendment
- Reactions to Moving Forward Act, Increasing Platform Competition, Service Providers Keeping Americans Connected
- Examples of Governments Protecting Free Speech are Many, says German Marshall Fund
- Breakfast Media Minute: July 2, 2020
Signup for Broadband Breakfast
Fiber1 month ago
Fiber Networks Hold a Cybersecurity Advantage Over Rival Co-Axial and Wireless Technologies, Say Panelists
Congress1 month ago
Senators Introduce Healthcare Broadband Bill as House Companion, Proposes $2 Billion Telehealth Expansion
Artificial Intelligence2 weeks ago
Brookings Panelists Emphasize Importance of Addressing Biases in Artificial Intelligence Technology
Congress1 month ago
Partisan Disagreement Delays Broadband Funding That Might Come Through HEROES Act
#broadbandlive2 weeks ago
Broadband Breakfast Live Online on Wednesday, June 17, 2020 – Federal Broadband Funds and Opportunity Zones
Expert Opinion1 month ago
Gary Bolton: Under the Stress of COVID-19, the Networks That Held Fast Were Symmetrical Fiber Broadband
Fiber3 weeks ago
Bandwidth Demands Project 10 Gigabit Network Capabilities Required Next Decade
Broadband Roundup3 days ago
Artificial Intelligence Task Force, State Cybersecurity, ADTRAN Offers Rural Funding Guidance