WASHINGTON, June 6, 2017 — Despite giving this week the title of “Infrastructure Week” at the White House, President Donald Trump and his staff haven’t taken any public actions to make digital infrastructure, such as high-speed broadband, a part of their plans for the much-discussed infrastructure bill.
“On infrastructure, the President has said all along he believes it will be a bipartisan exercise and its one that we will be looking to partner with [Democrats] on,” White House Director of Legislative Affairs Marc Short said during a Monday press briefing. “Whether it becomes an individual bill or its part of something else, I don’t know yet.”
Neither Short nor the two White House officials who briefed the press on the Trump Administration’s plans earlier on Monday made any mention of high-speed broadband when discussing the bill that is expected to be a centerpiece of President Trump’s legislative agenda.
Instead, White House officials — including Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao, who is married to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Kentucky — made a spectacle out of unveiling plans to privatize the nation’s Air Traffic Control system, which has long been a goal of Republicans.
Conservatives have been opposed to the clout of public employee unions, such as the one that represents air traffic controllers, despite legal prohibitions on labor actions like striking.
White House officials continued to have no comment, when asked by BroadbandBreakfast News, whether high-speed broadband internet would be included in the infrastructure plan despite the lack of any announcement.
Still, there has been some movement from independent agencies within the Trump Administration on broadband despite the lack of action from the White House.
During a public trip through several Midwestern states, Federal Communications Commission Chairman Ajit Pai has on multiple occasions stated the need for more broadband investment, particularly in rural areas.
But Pai has on many occasions voiced opposition to the kinds of municipal and community broadband networks that rural communities have sought to deploy.
Incumbent communications companies like Verizon Communications and others have found it unprofitable to invest in bringing higher-speed connectivity broadband to areas they have traditionally service. These incumbents often support federal and state laws and regulations prohibiting attempts to install municipal networks.
- Advocates for Antitrust Enforcement Say Consumer Welfare Standard Only One Layer of Competition Law
- In Law More Than a Year, MOBILE Now Advocates Say Act Requires Further Implementation for 5G Deployment
- Broadband Roundup: Texas Reaches T-Mobile Settlement, Closing the ‘Homework Gap,’ Broadcast Ownership
- UTOPIA Fiber Announces Completion of Latest Round of Funding, a $48 Million Network Expansion
- Prakash Sangam: China’s Huawei Clones Are Greater Threat to National Security than Huawei
Signup for Broadband Breakfast
Intellectual Property4 months ago
In Congressional Oversight Hearing, Register of Copyrights Says Office Is Responding to Online Users
Broadband Data6 months ago
California Report: Income Most Significant Factor in Low Broadband Adoption
Privacy and Security3 months ago
Comparing Privacy Policies for Wearable Fitness Trackers: Apple, Fitbit, Xiaomi and Under Armour
Antitrust3 months ago
Addressing the Impact of Big Data Upon Antitrust is More Complicated Than a Big Tech Breakup
Expert Opinion5 months ago
Geoff Mulligan: A ‘Dumb’ Way to Build Smart Cities
Antitrust3 months ago
Broadband Roundup: Everyone (Almost) Gangs Up on Google, Muni Broadband Fact Sheet, SHLB Anchornet Conference
Broadband Roundup4 months ago
Cable Industry Touts Energy Efficiency, Next Century Highlights Open Access Fiber, Aspen Forum Set
Broadband's Impact5 months ago
Law Enforcement and Advocates of Facial Recognition Technologies Battle Misconceptions