WASHINGTON, November 21, 2017 — The White House on Friday defended the Federal Communications Commission’s decision to prevent telecommunications service resellers like TracPhone and Simply Wireless from participating in the Universal Service Fund Lifeline program, and to restrict participation in the program to facilities-based providers like AT&T, Verizon and T-Mobile.
The Lifeline program allows low-income households to purchase subsidized phone and internet service.
On Thursday, the FCC voted 3-2 along party lines to make companies that purchase excess capacity from receiving Lifeline subsidies. The subsidies are distributed from the Universal Service Fund, which is funded by fees included on most Americans’ phone and internet bills.
Republican Commissioner Mike O’Rielly said the changes are necessary to protect taxpayer dollars despite the fact that the USF has never been funded by tax revenues.
White House reiterates support for FCC efforts to ease digital divide in an efficient manner
Democrats and community groups have assailed the new restrictions — which will affect 70 percent of Lifeline-eligible consumers — as being counterproductive to the FCC’s longstanding efforts to close the digital divide by making phone and Internet service available to all Americans.
But in a statement emailed to BroadbandBreakfast.com, White House Deputy Press Secretary Hogan Gidley denied the changes would impact digital divide efforts, and defended them by claiming they are necessary to prevent fraud.
“The President and his Administration are absolutely focused on closing the digital divide, especially when it comes to ensuring broadband capabilities in rural areas,” Gidley said. “We support the FCC’s efforts to help low-income consumers get access to communications services, and we believe that can be done in an efficient manner to ensure less fraud and abuse.”
Gidley referred to a statement by FCC Chairman Ajit Pai noting that “1,234,929 Lifeline subscribers who apparently were not eligible to participate in the program as well as 6,378 individuals who apparently reenrolled after being reported dead.” Those subscribers’ costs add up to more than $137 million in abuse each year, Gidley said.
Democratic and consumer group criticism of the FCC action
But at Thursday’s open meeting, Democratic Commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel poured cold water on that line of argument and noted that the FCC had already been in the process of implementing a new program of anti-fraud controls to do just that.
Rosenworcel’s Republican colleagues were “discard[ing] its possibilities before we even begin,” she said.
The FCC will next turn its attention to repealing network neutrality rules that reclassified broadband Internet service under Title II of the Telecommunications Act of 1996.
Those rules — which were passed during the Obama Administration under then-Chairman Tom Wheeler — have been subject to a public comment process that has been disrupted by multiple instances of automated comment filings by non-existent people who claimed to be in favor of the repeal. The FCC is expected to vote on them at next month’s open meeting.
(Photo of Republican operative Hogan Gidley, who is the new White House Deputy Press Secretary.)
- Advocates for Antitrust Enforcement Say Consumer Welfare Standard Only One Layer of Competition Law
- In Law More Than a Year, MOBILE Now Advocates Say Act Requires Further Implementation for 5G Deployment
- Broadband Roundup: Texas Reaches T-Mobile Settlement, Closing the ‘Homework Gap,’ Broadcast Ownership
- UTOPIA Fiber Announces Completion of Latest Round of Funding, a $48 Million Network Expansion
- Prakash Sangam: China’s Huawei Clones Are Greater Threat to National Security than Huawei
Signup for Broadband Breakfast
Intellectual Property4 months ago
In Congressional Oversight Hearing, Register of Copyrights Says Office Is Responding to Online Users
Broadband Data6 months ago
California Report: Income Most Significant Factor in Low Broadband Adoption
Privacy and Security3 months ago
Comparing Privacy Policies for Wearable Fitness Trackers: Apple, Fitbit, Xiaomi and Under Armour
Antitrust3 months ago
Addressing the Impact of Big Data Upon Antitrust is More Complicated Than a Big Tech Breakup
Expert Opinion5 months ago
Geoff Mulligan: A ‘Dumb’ Way to Build Smart Cities
Antitrust3 months ago
Broadband Roundup: Everyone (Almost) Gangs Up on Google, Muni Broadband Fact Sheet, SHLB Anchornet Conference
Broadband Roundup4 months ago
Cable Industry Touts Energy Efficiency, Next Century Highlights Open Access Fiber, Aspen Forum Set
Broadband's Impact5 months ago
Law Enforcement and Advocates of Facial Recognition Technologies Battle Misconceptions