Digital Inclusion
White House Supports FCC Efforts to Close Digital Divide in Efficient Manner

WASHINGTON, November 21, 2017 — The White House on Friday defended the Federal Communications Commission’s decision to prevent telecommunications service resellers like TracPhone and Simply Wireless from participating in the Universal Service Fund Lifeline program, and to restrict participation in the program to facilities-based providers like AT&T, Verizon and T-Mobile.
The Lifeline program allows low-income households to purchase subsidized phone and internet service.
On Thursday, the FCC voted 3-2 along party lines to make companies that purchase excess capacity from receiving Lifeline subsidies. The subsidies are distributed from the Universal Service Fund, which is funded by fees included on most Americans’ phone and internet bills.
Republican Commissioner Mike O’Rielly said the changes are necessary to protect taxpayer dollars despite the fact that the USF has never been funded by tax revenues.
White House reiterates support for FCC efforts to ease digital divide in an efficient manner
Democrats and community groups have assailed the new restrictions — which will affect 70 percent of Lifeline-eligible consumers — as being counterproductive to the FCC’s longstanding efforts to close the digital divide by making phone and Internet service available to all Americans.
But in a statement emailed to BroadbandBreakfast.com, White House Deputy Press Secretary Hogan Gidley denied the changes would impact digital divide efforts, and defended them by claiming they are necessary to prevent fraud.
“The President and his Administration are absolutely focused on closing the digital divide, especially when it comes to ensuring broadband capabilities in rural areas,” Gidley said. “We support the FCC’s efforts to help low-income consumers get access to communications services, and we believe that can be done in an efficient manner to ensure less fraud and abuse.”
Gidley referred to a statement by FCC Chairman Ajit Pai noting that “1,234,929 Lifeline subscribers who apparently were not eligible to participate in the program as well as 6,378 individuals who apparently reenrolled after being reported dead.” Those subscribers’ costs add up to more than $137 million in abuse each year, Gidley said.
Democratic and consumer group criticism of the FCC action
But at Thursday’s open meeting, Democratic Commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel poured cold water on that line of argument and noted that the FCC had already been in the process of implementing a new program of anti-fraud controls to do just that.
Rosenworcel’s Republican colleagues were “discard[ing] its possibilities before we even begin,” she said.
The FCC will next turn its attention to repealing network neutrality rules that reclassified broadband Internet service under Title II of the Telecommunications Act of 1996.
Those rules — which were passed during the Obama Administration under then-Chairman Tom Wheeler — have been subject to a public comment process that has been disrupted by multiple instances of automated comment filings by non-existent people who claimed to be in favor of the repeal. The FCC is expected to vote on them at next month’s open meeting.
(Photo of Republican operative Hogan Gidley, who is the new White House Deputy Press Secretary.)
Digital Inclusion
Joe Supan: Why Internet Under 5 Megabits Per Second Should be Free

WASHINGTON, November 21, 2017 — The White House on Friday defended the Federal Communications Commission’s decision to prevent telecommunications service resellers like TracPhone and Simply Wireless from participating in the Universal Service Fund Lifeline program, and to restrict participation in the program to facilities-based providers like AT&T, Verizon and T-Mobile.
The Lifeline program allows low-income households to purchase subsidized phone and internet service.
On Thursday, the FCC voted 3-2 along party lines to make companies that purchase excess capacity from receiving Lifeline subsidies. The subsidies are distributed from the Universal Service Fund, which is funded by fees included on most Americans’ phone and internet bills.
Republican Commissioner Mike O’Rielly said the changes are necessary to protect taxpayer dollars despite the fact that the USF has never been funded by tax revenues.
White House reiterates support for FCC efforts to ease digital divide in an efficient manner
Democrats and community groups have assailed the new restrictions — which will affect 70 percent of Lifeline-eligible consumers — as being counterproductive to the FCC’s longstanding efforts to close the digital divide by making phone and Internet service available to all Americans.
But in a statement emailed to BroadbandBreakfast.com, White House Deputy Press Secretary Hogan Gidley denied the changes would impact digital divide efforts, and defended them by claiming they are necessary to prevent fraud.
“The President and his Administration are absolutely focused on closing the digital divide, especially when it comes to ensuring broadband capabilities in rural areas,” Gidley said. “We support the FCC’s efforts to help low-income consumers get access to communications services, and we believe that can be done in an efficient manner to ensure less fraud and abuse.”
Gidley referred to a statement by FCC Chairman Ajit Pai noting that “1,234,929 Lifeline subscribers who apparently were not eligible to participate in the program as well as 6,378 individuals who apparently reenrolled after being reported dead.” Those subscribers’ costs add up to more than $137 million in abuse each year, Gidley said.
Democratic and consumer group criticism of the FCC action
But at Thursday’s open meeting, Democratic Commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel poured cold water on that line of argument and noted that the FCC had already been in the process of implementing a new program of anti-fraud controls to do just that.
Rosenworcel’s Republican colleagues were “discard[ing] its possibilities before we even begin,” she said.
The FCC will next turn its attention to repealing network neutrality rules that reclassified broadband Internet service under Title II of the Telecommunications Act of 1996.
Those rules — which were passed during the Obama Administration under then-Chairman Tom Wheeler — have been subject to a public comment process that has been disrupted by multiple instances of automated comment filings by non-existent people who claimed to be in favor of the repeal. The FCC is expected to vote on them at next month’s open meeting.
(Photo of Republican operative Hogan Gidley, who is the new White House Deputy Press Secretary.)
Digital Inclusion
AT&T CEO John Stankey Joins Call For E-Rate Expansion To Households

WASHINGTON, November 21, 2017 — The White House on Friday defended the Federal Communications Commission’s decision to prevent telecommunications service resellers like TracPhone and Simply Wireless from participating in the Universal Service Fund Lifeline program, and to restrict participation in the program to facilities-based providers like AT&T, Verizon and T-Mobile.
The Lifeline program allows low-income households to purchase subsidized phone and internet service.
On Thursday, the FCC voted 3-2 along party lines to make companies that purchase excess capacity from receiving Lifeline subsidies. The subsidies are distributed from the Universal Service Fund, which is funded by fees included on most Americans’ phone and internet bills.
Republican Commissioner Mike O’Rielly said the changes are necessary to protect taxpayer dollars despite the fact that the USF has never been funded by tax revenues.
White House reiterates support for FCC efforts to ease digital divide in an efficient manner
Democrats and community groups have assailed the new restrictions — which will affect 70 percent of Lifeline-eligible consumers — as being counterproductive to the FCC’s longstanding efforts to close the digital divide by making phone and Internet service available to all Americans.
But in a statement emailed to BroadbandBreakfast.com, White House Deputy Press Secretary Hogan Gidley denied the changes would impact digital divide efforts, and defended them by claiming they are necessary to prevent fraud.
“The President and his Administration are absolutely focused on closing the digital divide, especially when it comes to ensuring broadband capabilities in rural areas,” Gidley said. “We support the FCC’s efforts to help low-income consumers get access to communications services, and we believe that can be done in an efficient manner to ensure less fraud and abuse.”
Gidley referred to a statement by FCC Chairman Ajit Pai noting that “1,234,929 Lifeline subscribers who apparently were not eligible to participate in the program as well as 6,378 individuals who apparently reenrolled after being reported dead.” Those subscribers’ costs add up to more than $137 million in abuse each year, Gidley said.
Democratic and consumer group criticism of the FCC action
But at Thursday’s open meeting, Democratic Commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel poured cold water on that line of argument and noted that the FCC had already been in the process of implementing a new program of anti-fraud controls to do just that.
Rosenworcel’s Republican colleagues were “discard[ing] its possibilities before we even begin,” she said.
The FCC will next turn its attention to repealing network neutrality rules that reclassified broadband Internet service under Title II of the Telecommunications Act of 1996.
Those rules — which were passed during the Obama Administration under then-Chairman Tom Wheeler — have been subject to a public comment process that has been disrupted by multiple instances of automated comment filings by non-existent people who claimed to be in favor of the repeal. The FCC is expected to vote on them at next month’s open meeting.
(Photo of Republican operative Hogan Gidley, who is the new White House Deputy Press Secretary.)
Digital Inclusion
Federal Communications Commission Releases Proposed Rules Regarding Emergency Broadband Benefit

WASHINGTON, November 21, 2017 — The White House on Friday defended the Federal Communications Commission’s decision to prevent telecommunications service resellers like TracPhone and Simply Wireless from participating in the Universal Service Fund Lifeline program, and to restrict participation in the program to facilities-based providers like AT&T, Verizon and T-Mobile.
The Lifeline program allows low-income households to purchase subsidized phone and internet service.
On Thursday, the FCC voted 3-2 along party lines to make companies that purchase excess capacity from receiving Lifeline subsidies. The subsidies are distributed from the Universal Service Fund, which is funded by fees included on most Americans’ phone and internet bills.
Republican Commissioner Mike O’Rielly said the changes are necessary to protect taxpayer dollars despite the fact that the USF has never been funded by tax revenues.
White House reiterates support for FCC efforts to ease digital divide in an efficient manner
Democrats and community groups have assailed the new restrictions — which will affect 70 percent of Lifeline-eligible consumers — as being counterproductive to the FCC’s longstanding efforts to close the digital divide by making phone and Internet service available to all Americans.
But in a statement emailed to BroadbandBreakfast.com, White House Deputy Press Secretary Hogan Gidley denied the changes would impact digital divide efforts, and defended them by claiming they are necessary to prevent fraud.
“The President and his Administration are absolutely focused on closing the digital divide, especially when it comes to ensuring broadband capabilities in rural areas,” Gidley said. “We support the FCC’s efforts to help low-income consumers get access to communications services, and we believe that can be done in an efficient manner to ensure less fraud and abuse.”
Gidley referred to a statement by FCC Chairman Ajit Pai noting that “1,234,929 Lifeline subscribers who apparently were not eligible to participate in the program as well as 6,378 individuals who apparently reenrolled after being reported dead.” Those subscribers’ costs add up to more than $137 million in abuse each year, Gidley said.
Democratic and consumer group criticism of the FCC action
But at Thursday’s open meeting, Democratic Commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel poured cold water on that line of argument and noted that the FCC had already been in the process of implementing a new program of anti-fraud controls to do just that.
Rosenworcel’s Republican colleagues were “discard[ing] its possibilities before we even begin,” she said.
The FCC will next turn its attention to repealing network neutrality rules that reclassified broadband Internet service under Title II of the Telecommunications Act of 1996.
Those rules — which were passed during the Obama Administration under then-Chairman Tom Wheeler — have been subject to a public comment process that has been disrupted by multiple instances of automated comment filings by non-existent people who claimed to be in favor of the repeal. The FCC is expected to vote on them at next month’s open meeting.
(Photo of Republican operative Hogan Gidley, who is the new White House Deputy Press Secretary.)
-
Artificial Intelligence3 months ago
U.S. Special Operations Command Employs AI and Machine Learning to Improve Operations
-
Broadband Roundup3 months ago
Benton on Middle Mile Open Access Networks, CENIC Fiber Route in California, Investors Buying Bitcoin
-
Section 2304 months ago
President Trump’s FCC Nominee Grilled on Section 230 During Senate Confirmation Hearing
-
Artificial Intelligence2 months ago
Artificial Intelligence Aims to Enhance Human Capabilities, But Only With Caution and Safeguards
-
Broadband Roundup3 months ago
Trump Signs Executive Order on Artificial Intelligence, How Not to Wreck the FCC, Broadband Performance in Europe
-
5G4 months ago
5G Stands to Impact Industry Before Consumers, Says Verizon CEO Hans Vestberg
-
Fiber2 months ago
Smaller Internet Providers Were Instrumental to Fiber Deployment in 2020, Says Fiber Broadband Association
-
#broadbandlive4 months ago
Broadband Breakfast Live Online Event Series on ‘Tools for Broadband Deployment’ on Enhancing Rural America