WASHINGTON, May 17, 2018 -- National Economic Council Director Larry Kudlow on Thursday said President Donald Trump's calls to reverse a Commerce Department order banning the Chinese telecommunications equipment firm ZTE from exporting American products came in response to a request from Chinese president Xi Jinping.
"I think the president is responding to a request from President Xi to take another look at it," Kudlow said while speaking to reporters outside the White House.
Trump trades 'America First' for 'Too many jobs in China lost'
But after this past weekend, it is unclear whether any of those actions will stick. As has become his habit since taking office, Trump upended the proverbial table Sunday with a tweet announcing that “President Xi of China, and I, are working together to give massive Chinese phone company, ZTE, a way to get back into business, fast.”
Trump added that too many jobs in China had been lost and that he'd instructed the Commerce Department to "get it done!"
The weekend tweet was a dramatic reversal for Trump, who'd convinced voters to put him in the White House with promises that he'd crack down Chinese trade abuses and alleged theft of American jobs -- which he described as "rape" -- and that he'd label the world's most populous country a currency manipulator.
Kudlow dismissed the possibility that Trump's change of heart was linked to a $500 million investment by Chinese state-owned company in support of an Indonesia-based development featuring a Trump hotel, golf courses, and residences.
A report on the investment came just one day after Trump's tweet, leading some observers to suggest that Trump, who has not divested from his hotel, golf, and real estate empire, might be in violation of the Emoluments Clause of the United States Constitution.
“Oh for heaven’s sakes," he said, exasperated at being asked to respond to the allegation. "I’m not even going to respond to that."
Xi wants Trump to reverse an export ban leveled after ZTE execs lied and obstructed justice
ZTE became an issue in US-China relations last month after the Commerce Department's Bureau of Industry and Security issued an order denying ZTE the ability to export American-made products for seven years.
In March, ZTE executives agreed to settle the sanctions violations by paying a $1.19 billion fine and accepting a suspended seven-year export ban to automatically take effect if it was found that the company violated any aspect of the settlement agreement or committed any more violations of American Export Administration Regulations.
Because the two major components in most mobile phones -- Google's Android operating system and radio chips made by San Diego, California-based Qualcomm -- are made in the United States, an export ban is a potential death sentence for the company.
But the Commerce Department imposed the ban after investigators discovered that company executives had made false statements and obstructed justice during negotiations to settle charges against the Shenzen, China-based company, formally known as the Zhongxing Telecommunications Equipment Corporation, for violating sanctions by selling telecom equipment to Iran and North Korea.
Chinese telecom gear has long inspired security fears in US
Chinese telecom equipment makers like ZTE and Huawei have also long been considered security risks by the American defense and intelligence establishments, which fear that the Chinese government-owned companies insert backdoor that could be used for espionage into their equipment.
As a result, the Pentagon recently banned the sale of Huawei and ZTE phones in the subsidized retail stores located on military bases known as Post Exchanges, and the Federal Communications Commission issued an order prohibiting Universal Service Fund dollars from being spent on gear from either manufacturer.
While Kudlow said the government has "always had a security concern" when it comes to ZTE, when asked by BroadbandBreakfast whether Trump would support reversing the FCC ban, he replied: "I can't comment on that."
He also wouldn't say if security concerns would factor into a decision on whether or not the export ban gets reversed.
"I would just say that Secretary Ross is reviewing some of the remedies and penalties," he said. "That's as far as I can go right now."
- FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr Touts Work on Enhancing Telehealth and Flexible Spectrum
- Internet Industry Under the Microscope as House Committee Grills Witnesses on Liability for Online Content
- Big Tech Gets a Big Lashing by Democratic Presidential Candidates, on Antitrust, Section 230 and Data Privacy
- China Experts Advise Political Leaders to Tone Down Disputes, Cite Benefits of Bilateral Trade with China
- With or Without Negative Latency, Google Stadia Likely to Massively Churn Broadband Bandwidth
Signup for Broadband Breakfast
Broadband Data4 months ago
California Report: Income Most Significant Factor in Low Broadband Adoption
Intellectual Property3 months ago
In Congressional Oversight Hearing, Register of Copyrights Says Office Is Responding to Online Users
Broadband Data4 months ago
Pennsylvania Broadband Speeds Worse Than Previously Believed, According to State Report
Privacy and Security1 month ago
Comparing Privacy Policies for Wearable Fitness Trackers: Apple, Fitbit, Xiaomi and Under Armour
Antitrust1 month ago
Addressing the Impact of Big Data Upon Antitrust is More Complicated Than a Big Tech Breakup
Expert Opinion3 months ago
Geoff Mulligan: A ‘Dumb’ Way to Build Smart Cities
Antitrust1 month ago
Broadband Roundup: Everyone (Almost) Gangs Up on Google, Muni Broadband Fact Sheet, SHLB Anchornet Conference
Broadband Roundup2 months ago
Cable Industry Touts Energy Efficiency, Next Century Highlights Open Access Fiber, Aspen Forum Set