WASHINGTON, June 25, 2018 - Carnegie Mellon University academics provided a rare positive outlook on what data analytics can do to improve society, a stark contrast to recent outrage over data privacy scandals.
At a Wednesday Capitol Hill briefing on, “Artificial Intelligence for Good”, Carnegie Mellon hosted an optimistic evaluation of developments of AI in private sector and academia.
Among the numerous possibilities for future good, AI may be able to help identify and provide aid to those who are contemplating self-harm, said CMU Associate Professor Jason Hong.
For those who are planning to harm themselves, for example, the words ibuprofen, advil and the crying emoji are about a 13 times stronger signal” than the words “kill or “suicide,” he said.
AI can be used to help combat human trafficking and to identify wildlife more accurately
Jay Qi, data scientist at the data analytics and deep learning company Uptake, created software to combat human trafficking in foreign countries.
This technology that may help people on the ground determine who is a victim of human trafficking. He also spoke of “using AI to classify images” for nature conservation organizations to help them find wildlife in the camera traps more efficiently.
Audience members remained skeptical of Panglossian optimism
Despite positive developments and innovations, audience members remained skeptical of the optimistic outlook.
The audience questioned how biased data sets--resulting in a biased AI system-- may be used to perpetuate biases in an increasingly data-driven society. A map of New York shown during the presentation showed a significant lack of data points from people in a low-income area, leading to doubts over whether such a hole in a data set could lead to inaccuracies in data analysis.
However, Qi retained a positive outlook. “Having a system is still better than not having a system,” Qi said.
- Broadband Roundup: Mayor Pete Makes Trillion-Dollar Infrastructure Bid, USDA ReConnect Grants Announced, US Telecom and Robocalls
- Panelists Call Federal Privacy Legislation Necessary and Express Optimism Toward That Goal
- U.S., Australian and British Law Enforcement and High Tech Advocates Debate Access to Encryption
- State of the Net Panelists Fiercely Defend Section 230 as a Crucial Protection of Free Speech
- The Biggest Tech Companies – Amazon, Apple, Facebook and Google – Have Nowhere to Go But Down, Say Panelists
Signup for Broadband Breakfast
Broadband Data8 months ago
Pennsylvania Broadband Speeds Worse Than Previously Believed, According to State Report
Broadband Data7 months ago
California Report: Income Most Significant Factor in Low Broadband Adoption
Intellectual Property6 months ago
In Congressional Oversight Hearing, Register of Copyrights Says Office Is Responding to Online Users
Privacy and Security5 months ago
Comparing Privacy Policies for Wearable Fitness Trackers: Apple, Fitbit, Xiaomi and Under Armour
FCC10 years ago
Telecom Companies Are Using Fight Interrupting Oscar Ceremony Broadcast To Manipulate Public and FCC, Argue Broadcasters
Antitrust5 months ago
Addressing the Impact of Big Data Upon Antitrust is More Complicated Than a Big Tech Breakup
Expert Opinion7 months ago
Geoff Mulligan: A ‘Dumb’ Way to Build Smart Cities
Broadband's Impact10 years ago
Make No Mistake: Internet Content Subscription Models will come!