WASHINGTON, June 21, 2018 - Top digital advertising experts defended the importance of data collection against a committee skeptical of ad companies’ ethics.
With data privacy increasingly at the forefront of tech policy debate, a June 14 House Energy and Commerce Committee hearing on the digital advertising ecosystem became a flashpoint for the debate between members of congress and industry experts on the dangers digital advertising present to consumer data privacy.
Among the markers of controversy include the Equifax data breach of September 2017 that compromised millions of Americans. This year, revelations of Facebook selling user data to Cambridge Analytica, and more than 60 other companies.
An example of the practice of digital advertising tracking, as applied to a congresswoman and opiods
Rep. Debbie Dingell, D-Mich., recounted how she had been conducting research on opioids late night on Google. In the morning, she was being given drug rehabilitation center advertisements online.
“I didn’t want anybody to think that I was a drug user, but that’s the kind of data that’s being collected, then a potential employer can buy that from somebody,” Dingell warned.
When asked if that could actually happen, privacy official Rachel Glasser said: “Anything is really possible, right? It absolutely can happen,” Glasser said, though within the industry, there are restrictions on certain types of targeted advertising.
Glasser, chief privacy officer at Wunderman - parent company of a KPMG data analytics company - defended how companies typically use consumer data.
“Most ad tech companies don’t want to know the identity of a consumer,” Glasser said. “They only want to link interest categories (loves travel) or demographic data (male under 30) with a consumer's browser so that they can serve up relevant ads.”
Glasser emphasized the importance of digital advertising to the current internet. “Digital advertising is the lifeblood for the internet economy,” Glasser said. "Data is at the center of this American success story.”
Necessary to maintain the internet marketplace, or reserving broad rights to themselves – or both?
Howard Beales, George Washington University professor of strategic management and public policy argued that revenue from digital advertising is necessary to maintain the internet content as a private market.
“The value of advertising depends critically on the availability of information about the likely viewer,” Beales said, stressing the importance of collecting data for internet content providers.
“When information is available, advertising prices are roughly three times higher than when there is no information about the viewer. Impairing the flow of information would significantly reduce the revenues available to support internet content, an impact that would be particularly problematic for smaller publishers.”
Congresswoman Jan Schakowsky, D-Illinois, criticized Congress for the lack of effective protection policies.
“Congress has been woefully slow in responding to the risks that online advertising practices pose to privacy, fairness, and our very democracy. The FCC does not have the resources it needs to be an effective consumer watchdog,” she said, listing lack of staff and not enough tools.
Justin Brookman, director at Consumers Union - which publishes Consumer Reports - called for better transparency, arguing that Congress should legislate some basic “rules of the road”, for instance, requiring greater transparency.
“You know, I review privacy policies as part of my job. I can’t make heads or tails of them, and it’s my job,” he said. “They don’t actually say what companies are doing - they reserve really broad rights to do stuff.”
- FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr Touts Work on Enhancing Telehealth and Flexible Spectrum
- Internet Industry Under the Microscope as House Committee Grills Witnesses on Liability for Online Content
- Big Tech Gets a Big Lashing by Democratic Presidential Candidates, on Antitrust, Section 230 and Data Privacy
- China Experts Advise Political Leaders to Tone Down Disputes, Cite Benefits of Bilateral Trade with China
- With or Without Negative Latency, Google Stadia Likely to Massively Churn Broadband Bandwidth
Signup for Broadband Breakfast
Broadband Data4 months ago
California Report: Income Most Significant Factor in Low Broadband Adoption
Broadband Data4 months ago
Pennsylvania Broadband Speeds Worse Than Previously Believed, According to State Report
Intellectual Property3 months ago
In Congressional Oversight Hearing, Register of Copyrights Says Office Is Responding to Online Users
Privacy and Security1 month ago
Comparing Privacy Policies for Wearable Fitness Trackers: Apple, Fitbit, Xiaomi and Under Armour
Antitrust1 month ago
Addressing the Impact of Big Data Upon Antitrust is More Complicated Than a Big Tech Breakup
Expert Opinion3 months ago
Geoff Mulligan: A ‘Dumb’ Way to Build Smart Cities
Antitrust1 month ago
Broadband Roundup: Everyone (Almost) Gangs Up on Google, Muni Broadband Fact Sheet, SHLB Anchornet Conference
Broadband Roundup2 months ago
Cable Industry Touts Energy Efficiency, Next Century Highlights Open Access Fiber, Aspen Forum Set