Antitrust
As the Media Landscape Turns, the National Association of Broadcasters Finds New Rivals

WASHINGTON, July 23, 2019 – Television broadcasters’ main bête noire used to be the cable industry, known more formally as “multichannel video programming distributors.”
But the changing media landscape is forcing the National Association of Broadcasters to look for new rivals like AT&T, Dish Networks, and “big tech.”
At a Tuesday luncheon of the Media Institute, NAB CEO Gordon Smith insisted that the broadcasting industry still has a vital role to plan in protecting the First Amendment.
In particular, telecommunications companies like AT&T (with its DirecTV division) and Dish have “exploited” distant signal licensing and failing to serve local broadcast needs.
Smith also addressed challenges that the news industry faces against social media’s rise. As it has risen, so have divisive and partisan politics, he said.
Smith went so far as to call social media a “destabilizing force” on society.
At the same time, the development of new technology means that broadcasters have new ways to share their content. They are making “great strides” to show more content on more devices.
However, he said, local broadcasters must be able to produce their content as efficiently as possible without extensive regulation, in order to compete with the “big tech” companies.
Some of these companies, he said, operate platforms that can produce “huge public consequences.” Continuing to promote the broadcasting industry is not just a matter of consumer protection, but also of public safety.
Unlike big tech, broadcast news organizations have continued providing coherent news to the public, he said. Broadcasters protect consumers from scams and help them make informed decisions.
However, telecom and satellite companies taking advantage of retransmission consent are retransmitting national news instead of providing news offered by local broadcasters.
Retransmission consent requires cable operators and other multichannel video programming distributors to obtain permission from commercial broadcasters before carrying their programming.
“Let’s stop subsidizing billion-dollar companies and make sure that people get the information that local news uniquely provides,” he said. It is important for policymakers to remember that content is expensive and that is paid for through advertising and retransmission consent.
With regard to public safety, Smith said that when “disaster strikes,” no other segment of the media industry matches the commitment of broadcasters. They will continue to be there for their communities and make sure that people obtain the “most trustworthy” and “most timely” information.
(Photo of NAB CEO Gordon Smith by Masha Abarinova.)
Antitrust
House Committee Hears of Big Tech’s Alleged Anticompetitive Behavior in New Hearing

WASHINGTON, July 23, 2019 – Television broadcasters’ main bête noire used to be the cable industry, known more formally as “multichannel video programming distributors.”
But the changing media landscape is forcing the National Association of Broadcasters to look for new rivals like AT&T, Dish Networks, and “big tech.”
At a Tuesday luncheon of the Media Institute, NAB CEO Gordon Smith insisted that the broadcasting industry still has a vital role to plan in protecting the First Amendment.
In particular, telecommunications companies like AT&T (with its DirecTV division) and Dish have “exploited” distant signal licensing and failing to serve local broadcast needs.
Smith also addressed challenges that the news industry faces against social media’s rise. As it has risen, so have divisive and partisan politics, he said.
Smith went so far as to call social media a “destabilizing force” on society.
At the same time, the development of new technology means that broadcasters have new ways to share their content. They are making “great strides” to show more content on more devices.
However, he said, local broadcasters must be able to produce their content as efficiently as possible without extensive regulation, in order to compete with the “big tech” companies.
Some of these companies, he said, operate platforms that can produce “huge public consequences.” Continuing to promote the broadcasting industry is not just a matter of consumer protection, but also of public safety.
Unlike big tech, broadcast news organizations have continued providing coherent news to the public, he said. Broadcasters protect consumers from scams and help them make informed decisions.
However, telecom and satellite companies taking advantage of retransmission consent are retransmitting national news instead of providing news offered by local broadcasters.
Retransmission consent requires cable operators and other multichannel video programming distributors to obtain permission from commercial broadcasters before carrying their programming.
“Let’s stop subsidizing billion-dollar companies and make sure that people get the information that local news uniquely provides,” he said. It is important for policymakers to remember that content is expensive and that is paid for through advertising and retransmission consent.
With regard to public safety, Smith said that when “disaster strikes,” no other segment of the media industry matches the commitment of broadcasters. They will continue to be there for their communities and make sure that people obtain the “most trustworthy” and “most timely” information.
(Photo of NAB CEO Gordon Smith by Masha Abarinova.)
Media Ownership
Pandemic Isn’t Death Knell Of Theaters, Says Lionsgate Vice Chairman

WASHINGTON, July 23, 2019 – Television broadcasters’ main bête noire used to be the cable industry, known more formally as “multichannel video programming distributors.”
But the changing media landscape is forcing the National Association of Broadcasters to look for new rivals like AT&T, Dish Networks, and “big tech.”
At a Tuesday luncheon of the Media Institute, NAB CEO Gordon Smith insisted that the broadcasting industry still has a vital role to plan in protecting the First Amendment.
In particular, telecommunications companies like AT&T (with its DirecTV division) and Dish have “exploited” distant signal licensing and failing to serve local broadcast needs.
Smith also addressed challenges that the news industry faces against social media’s rise. As it has risen, so have divisive and partisan politics, he said.
Smith went so far as to call social media a “destabilizing force” on society.
At the same time, the development of new technology means that broadcasters have new ways to share their content. They are making “great strides” to show more content on more devices.
However, he said, local broadcasters must be able to produce their content as efficiently as possible without extensive regulation, in order to compete with the “big tech” companies.
Some of these companies, he said, operate platforms that can produce “huge public consequences.” Continuing to promote the broadcasting industry is not just a matter of consumer protection, but also of public safety.
Unlike big tech, broadcast news organizations have continued providing coherent news to the public, he said. Broadcasters protect consumers from scams and help them make informed decisions.
However, telecom and satellite companies taking advantage of retransmission consent are retransmitting national news instead of providing news offered by local broadcasters.
Retransmission consent requires cable operators and other multichannel video programming distributors to obtain permission from commercial broadcasters before carrying their programming.
“Let’s stop subsidizing billion-dollar companies and make sure that people get the information that local news uniquely provides,” he said. It is important for policymakers to remember that content is expensive and that is paid for through advertising and retransmission consent.
With regard to public safety, Smith said that when “disaster strikes,” no other segment of the media industry matches the commitment of broadcasters. They will continue to be there for their communities and make sure that people obtain the “most trustworthy” and “most timely” information.
(Photo of NAB CEO Gordon Smith by Masha Abarinova.)
Media Ownership
News Organizations Must Have a Broad Representation in the Communities They Cover

WASHINGTON, July 23, 2019 – Television broadcasters’ main bête noire used to be the cable industry, known more formally as “multichannel video programming distributors.”
But the changing media landscape is forcing the National Association of Broadcasters to look for new rivals like AT&T, Dish Networks, and “big tech.”
At a Tuesday luncheon of the Media Institute, NAB CEO Gordon Smith insisted that the broadcasting industry still has a vital role to plan in protecting the First Amendment.
In particular, telecommunications companies like AT&T (with its DirecTV division) and Dish have “exploited” distant signal licensing and failing to serve local broadcast needs.
Smith also addressed challenges that the news industry faces against social media’s rise. As it has risen, so have divisive and partisan politics, he said.
Smith went so far as to call social media a “destabilizing force” on society.
At the same time, the development of new technology means that broadcasters have new ways to share their content. They are making “great strides” to show more content on more devices.
However, he said, local broadcasters must be able to produce their content as efficiently as possible without extensive regulation, in order to compete with the “big tech” companies.
Some of these companies, he said, operate platforms that can produce “huge public consequences.” Continuing to promote the broadcasting industry is not just a matter of consumer protection, but also of public safety.
Unlike big tech, broadcast news organizations have continued providing coherent news to the public, he said. Broadcasters protect consumers from scams and help them make informed decisions.
However, telecom and satellite companies taking advantage of retransmission consent are retransmitting national news instead of providing news offered by local broadcasters.
Retransmission consent requires cable operators and other multichannel video programming distributors to obtain permission from commercial broadcasters before carrying their programming.
“Let’s stop subsidizing billion-dollar companies and make sure that people get the information that local news uniquely provides,” he said. It is important for policymakers to remember that content is expensive and that is paid for through advertising and retransmission consent.
With regard to public safety, Smith said that when “disaster strikes,” no other segment of the media industry matches the commitment of broadcasters. They will continue to be there for their communities and make sure that people obtain the “most trustworthy” and “most timely” information.
(Photo of NAB CEO Gordon Smith by Masha Abarinova.)
-
Artificial Intelligence3 months ago
U.S. Special Operations Command Employs AI and Machine Learning to Improve Operations
-
Broadband Roundup3 months ago
Benton on Middle Mile Open Access Networks, CENIC Fiber Route in California, Investors Buying Bitcoin
-
Section 2304 months ago
President Trump’s FCC Nominee Grilled on Section 230 During Senate Confirmation Hearing
-
Artificial Intelligence2 months ago
Artificial Intelligence Aims to Enhance Human Capabilities, But Only With Caution and Safeguards
-
Broadband Roundup3 months ago
Trump Signs Executive Order on Artificial Intelligence, How Not to Wreck the FCC, Broadband Performance in Europe
-
5G4 months ago
5G Stands to Impact Industry Before Consumers, Says Verizon CEO Hans Vestberg
-
Fiber2 months ago
Smaller Internet Providers Were Instrumental to Fiber Deployment in 2020, Says Fiber Broadband Association
-
#broadbandlive4 months ago
Broadband Breakfast Live Online Event Series on ‘Tools for Broadband Deployment’ on Enhancing Rural America