WASHINGTON, July 30, 2019 – Privacy legislation and antitrust action don’t normally get discussed together. Yet as big tech firms are increasingly under fire from competition authorities, privacy law becomes a potential tool against social media and search engine giants.
At FiscalNote’s Privacy and Antitrust luncheon on Thursday, two major privacy bills were on the table: the European Union General Data Protection Regulation and the California Consumer Privacy Act.
“Big data” must be addressed when discussing privacy concerns, said Gabrielle Kohlmeier, associate general counsel for antitrust and strategic affairs at Verizon.
Policymakers need to differentiate between business and consumer data to see if they require the same amount of regulation.
When policymakers receive data, their goal is to exceed expectations and enhance consumer protections, said David Eppstein, legislative counsel at the American Bar Association.
In the EU, thousands of GDPR violation complaints have been recorded so far. Reflecting on the GDPR’s drawbacks will be beneficial when improving privacy regulations in the U.S.
While U.S.-based companies have already been adhering to the EU’s GDPR rules for more than a year, the CCPA doesn’t takes effect until January 2020.
Then, however, it will likely become the “law of the land” all over the United States, said Jonathan Becker, shareholder at Greenberg Taurig.
The California legislation’s implementation date could serve as a trigger for Congress, which has been closely scrutinizing the impact GDPR has had, he said.
Significant cyber security weaknesses and lack of data security in U.S. agencies makes it harder to pass privacy legislation, said Jamie Danker, director of privacy at Easy Dynamics. Agencies and private companies also must grapple with the issue of how to define personally identifiable information.
Businesses need to look at privacy issues as a matter of consumer trust and choice, said Kohlmeier. If companies only follow the minimum compliance for privacy, they would negatively impact consumer trust and competition.
The U.S. has specific antitrust terms tied to a complex economic analysis of monopolies. “Being a big company in this country is not inherently bad,” she said. The problem is that some entities are looking to loosen antitrust and privacy restrictions.
Yet Becker advised against going after big data for political purposes, which often seems to be the case. Policymakers should acknowledge and understand that companies use aggregated data in different ways, he said.
(Photo of event by Masha Abarinova.)
- Democrats Lash at FCC Chairman Ajit Pai For Repealing Net Neutrality, Not Producing Broadband Maps
- Sens. Ed Markey and Chris Van Hollen Urge Using E-Rate Funds to Close the Homework Gap
- Trump Administration’s Orders to Halt WeChat and TikTok Transactions Promise to Affect Chinese Americans First
- Karl Rove Promotes Open Radio Access Network, FCC Talks 5G, Digital Divide and ‘One Touch Make Ready’
- Breakfast Media Minute: September 18, 2020
Signup for Broadband Breakfast
Fiber4 months ago
Fiber Networks Hold a Cybersecurity Advantage Over Rival Co-Axial and Wireless Technologies, Say Panelists
Congress4 months ago
Senators Introduce Healthcare Broadband Bill as House Companion, Proposes $2 Billion Telehealth Expansion
Artificial Intelligence3 months ago
Brookings Panelists Emphasize Importance of Addressing Biases in Artificial Intelligence Technology
China5 months ago
China Expert Predicts that Nation’s Flawed Coronavirus Response Will Damage the Power of Chinese Communist Party
Infrastructure6 months ago
Broadband Breakfast Live Online Will Stream Every Wednesday at 12 Noon ET on ‘Broadband and the Coronavirus’
Education6 months ago
Online Elementary Education is No Spring Break for Parents Teaching from Home
Artificial Intelligence3 months ago
U.S. State Department Employing Artificial Intelligence Against COVID-19 Misinformation
Rural5 months ago
Why the Rural Digital Opportunity Fund is So Significant, and How to Succeed in Applying For RDOF