WASHINGTON, July 31, 2019- Broadband mapping experts believe that the Federal Communications Commission and internet service providers are not doing enough to improve its reporting of nationwide internet coverage.
The Schools, Health & Libraries Broadband Coalition hosted a webinar on Wednesday to discuss how current broadband mapping inefficiently displays lack of connectivity.
The FCC keeps hammering the message that 92 percent of people in the U.S. have internet access, said Sascha Meinrath, director of X-Lab. But that statement, he said, isn’t true.
The head of the Center for Internet as Infrastructure Bob Ballance referenced FCC Commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel’s statement that “the future belongs to the connected.”
However, he said, connectivity often comes down to the district in which people reside. Even as the quality of broadband improves, providers must constantly update their maps to get a better understanding of areas that need coverage.
Every data set collected, Ballance said, will have its own limitations. That is why it’s important to combine the mapping data that the FCC provides and data that is self-reported from individual communities.
Broadband mapping in the U.S. is unusual, said Meinrath, in that the maps distributed by providers do not necessarily reflect the experiences of people on the ground. People are told that high-speed internet is available when people who are self-reporting say that they do not have that connectivity available.
What’s especially concerning, he said, is that the discrepancies between FCC data and on-the-ground internet speed tests have increased over the past few years. X-Lab scrutinized this information by compared their coverage results for the state of Pennsylvania to those of the FCC.
The FCC’s map of Pennsylvania shows that 100 percent of the state is connected to broadband, said Meinrath. X-Lab, on the other hand, identified only a few areas of the state that provided service higher than the FCC minimum broadband speed.
The government must provide clean and reasonable mapping data, said Ballance. Because there are so many hyperbolic statements surrounding broadband, he said, misinformation about broadband usage can easily spread.
It is critical that broadband mapping capture specifically how many households receive data and where internet providers are primarily located, said Meinrath.
(Illustration from "United States of Broadband Map," by the New America Foundation.)
- Online Speech Has Harmful Effects on Both Individuals and Society, According to Mary Anne Franks
- Pandemic Has Created an Environment for Consumer Fraud, Say Congressional Leaders
- Breakfast Media Minute: July 10, 2020
- Metrics and Automation Can Improve Federal Cybersecurity Measures
- Federal Communications Commission Must Reconsider Ligado Offer, Says Former Commissioner
Signup for Broadband Breakfast
Artificial Intelligence3 weeks ago
Brookings Panelists Emphasize Importance of Addressing Biases in Artificial Intelligence Technology
Artificial Intelligence2 weeks ago
U.S. State Department Employing Artificial Intelligence Against COVID-19 Misinformation
Congress1 month ago
Partisan Disagreement Delays Broadband Funding That Might Come Through HEROES Act
Broadband Roundup2 weeks ago
Artificial Intelligence Task Force, State Cybersecurity, ADTRAN Offers Rural Funding Guidance
#broadbandlive4 weeks ago
Broadband Breakfast Live Online on Wednesday, June 17, 2020 – Federal Broadband Funds and Opportunity Zones
Expert Opinion1 month ago
Gary Bolton: Under the Stress of COVID-19, the Networks That Held Fast Were Symmetrical Fiber Broadband
Education2 weeks ago
A Mix of Resources and Technologies Are Needed to Close the Homework Gap
Fiber1 month ago
Bandwidth Demands Project 10 Gigabit Network Capabilities Required Next Decade