WASHINGTON, July 31, 2019- Broadband mapping experts believe that the Federal Communications Commission and internet service providers are not doing enough to improve its reporting of nationwide internet coverage.
The Schools, Health & Libraries Broadband Coalition hosted a webinar on Wednesday to discuss how current broadband mapping inefficiently displays lack of connectivity.
The FCC keeps hammering the message that 92 percent of people in the U.S. have internet access, said Sascha Meinrath, director of X-Lab. But that statement, he said, isn’t true.
The head of the Center for Internet as Infrastructure Bob Ballance referenced FCC Commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel’s statement that “the future belongs to the connected.”
However, he said, connectivity often comes down to the district in which people reside. Even as the quality of broadband improves, providers must constantly update their maps to get a better understanding of areas that need coverage.
Every data set collected, Ballance said, will have its own limitations. That is why it’s important to combine the mapping data that the FCC provides and data that is self-reported from individual communities.
Broadband mapping in the U.S. is unusual, said Meinrath, in that the maps distributed by providers do not necessarily reflect the experiences of people on the ground. People are told that high-speed internet is available when people who are self-reporting say that they do not have that connectivity available.
What’s especially concerning, he said, is that the discrepancies between FCC data and on-the-ground internet speed tests have increased over the past few years. X-Lab scrutinized this information by compared their coverage results for the state of Pennsylvania to those of the FCC.
The FCC’s map of Pennsylvania shows that 100 percent of the state is connected to broadband, said Meinrath. X-Lab, on the other hand, identified only a few areas of the state that provided service higher than the FCC minimum broadband speed.
The government must provide clean and reasonable mapping data, said Ballance. Because there are so many hyperbolic statements surrounding broadband, he said, misinformation about broadband usage can easily spread.
It is critical that broadband mapping capture specifically how many households receive data and where internet providers are primarily located, said Meinrath.
(Illustration from "United States of Broadband Map," by the New America Foundation.)
- Advocates for Antitrust Enforcement Say Consumer Welfare Standard Only One Layer of Competition Law
- In Law More Than a Year, MOBILE Now Advocates Say Act Requires Further Implementation for 5G Deployment
- Broadband Roundup: Texas Reaches T-Mobile Settlement, Closing the ‘Homework Gap,’ Broadcast Ownership
- UTOPIA Fiber Announces Completion of Latest Round of Funding, a $48 Million Network Expansion
- Prakash Sangam: China’s Huawei Clones Are Greater Threat to National Security than Huawei
Signup for Broadband Breakfast
Intellectual Property4 months ago
In Congressional Oversight Hearing, Register of Copyrights Says Office Is Responding to Online Users
Broadband Data6 months ago
California Report: Income Most Significant Factor in Low Broadband Adoption
Privacy and Security3 months ago
Comparing Privacy Policies for Wearable Fitness Trackers: Apple, Fitbit, Xiaomi and Under Armour
Antitrust3 months ago
Addressing the Impact of Big Data Upon Antitrust is More Complicated Than a Big Tech Breakup
Expert Opinion5 months ago
Geoff Mulligan: A ‘Dumb’ Way to Build Smart Cities
Antitrust3 months ago
Broadband Roundup: Everyone (Almost) Gangs Up on Google, Muni Broadband Fact Sheet, SHLB Anchornet Conference
Broadband Roundup4 months ago
Cable Industry Touts Energy Efficiency, Next Century Highlights Open Access Fiber, Aspen Forum Set
Broadband's Impact5 months ago
Law Enforcement and Advocates of Facial Recognition Technologies Battle Misconceptions