WASHINGTON, July 9, 2019 — Amazon may be profiting from the sale of products promoted by increasing numbers of fake ratings and reviews, raising concerns among lawmakers.
Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Frank Pallone, D-N.J., and Consumer Protection and Commerce Subcommittee Chair Jan Schakowsky, D-Illinois, sent a letter to Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos on Tuesday discussing the potential harms of fraudulent ratings and reviews to both consumers and legitimate businesses.
Recent reports have found a significant spike in falsified Amazon reviews over the last year. During the first three months of 2018, only nine percent of reviews were from unverified purchasers, according to ReviewMeta.
By contrast, 58 percent of reviews posted to the platform during the first quarter of 2019 were from unverified purchasers. Of the 1.8 million unverified reviews posted to the platform during March 2019, 99.6 percent were 5-star reviews, skewing product rankings.
An investigation in April by consumer group Which? looked at indicators of inauthenticity such as thousands of unverified 5-star reviews being made on the same day to determine that Amazon “is losing the battle against fake reviews.”
Products with these fraudulent reviews not only dominate the front page of Amazon’s search results but are often labeled as “Amazon’s Choice,” lending them a legitimacy they do not deserve.
“Online reviews significantly affect consumers’ shopping decisions and it is important that Amazon proactively protect consumers from such misleading and harmful behavior,” Pallone and Schakowsky wrote. “The use of the ‘Amazon’s Choice’ label on these products is of particular concern because your company’s website promotes these products to consumers as ‘highly rated, well-priced products available to ship immediately.”
According to documents obtained by BuzzFeed News, unscrupulous sellers pay as much as $10,000 per month to manipulate Amazon search results in favor of their products.
“These fraudulent reviews can crowd out genuine comments and put honest sellers at an unfair disadvantage,” the representatives wrote. “Amazon can and should do more to protect consumers from these deceptive practices and we would like to better understand what measures your company is taking to address this issue.”
Pallone and Schakowsky have requested additional information from Amazon by July 30, including details about how the company identifies and prevents deceptive reviews, which product categories are the most affected by this problem, and how Amazon determines whether to label a product as “Amazon’s Choice.”
(Photo of Jeff Bezos by Seattle City Council used with permission.)
- Broadband Roundup: FCC Announces More Rural Funding, Everyone On Expands Footprint, US Telecom Gets Political
- With FCC Broadband Maps Denounced as ‘Terrible,’ Members of Congress Drill Into Details For Improvement
- Digital Literacy Legend and Rural Telecommunications Congress Board Member Gene Crick Dies
- Addressing the Impact of Big Data Upon Antitrust is More Complicated Than a Big Tech Breakup
- Speaking at Commerce Department Symposium, Federal Agencies Doubt Benefits of Spectrum Plan
Intellectual Property2 months ago
In Congressional Oversight Hearing, Register of Copyrights Says Office Is Responding to Online Users
Broadband Data3 months ago
Pennsylvania Broadband Speeds Worse Than Previously Believed, According to State Report
Broadband Data3 months ago
California Report: Income Most Significant Factor in Low Broadband Adoption
Privacy and Security1 week ago
Comparing Privacy Policies for Wearable Fitness Trackers: Apple, Fitbit, Xiaomi and Under Armour
Broadband Roundup1 month ago
Cable Industry Touts Energy Efficiency, Next Century Highlights Open Access Fiber, Aspen Forum Set
Drones1 month ago
Greater Commercial Use of Drones Will Force Revisions of Federal Aviation Administration Regulations, Say Experts
Fiber1 month ago
‘Dig Once’ Provides Future-Proofing Solution for Federal Highway Infrastructure, Says BroadbandNow
Free Speech3 weeks ago
Part IV: As Hate Speech Proliferates Online, Critics Want to See and Control Social Media’s Algorithms