WASHINGTON, July 9, 2019 — Amazon may be profiting from the sale of products promoted by increasing numbers of fake ratings and reviews, raising concerns among lawmakers.
Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Frank Pallone, D-N.J., and Consumer Protection and Commerce Subcommittee Chair Jan Schakowsky, D-Illinois, sent a letter to Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos on Tuesday discussing the potential harms of fraudulent ratings and reviews to both consumers and legitimate businesses.
Recent reports have found a significant spike in falsified Amazon reviews over the last year. During the first three months of 2018, only nine percent of reviews were from unverified purchasers, according to ReviewMeta.
By contrast, 58 percent of reviews posted to the platform during the first quarter of 2019 were from unverified purchasers. Of the 1.8 million unverified reviews posted to the platform during March 2019, 99.6 percent were 5-star reviews, skewing product rankings.
An investigation in April by consumer group Which? looked at indicators of inauthenticity such as thousands of unverified 5-star reviews being made on the same day to determine that Amazon “is losing the battle against fake reviews.”
Products with these fraudulent reviews not only dominate the front page of Amazon’s search results but are often labeled as “Amazon’s Choice,” lending them a legitimacy they do not deserve.
“Online reviews significantly affect consumers’ shopping decisions and it is important that Amazon proactively protect consumers from such misleading and harmful behavior,” Pallone and Schakowsky wrote. “The use of the ‘Amazon’s Choice’ label on these products is of particular concern because your company’s website promotes these products to consumers as ‘highly rated, well-priced products available to ship immediately.”
According to documents obtained by BuzzFeed News, unscrupulous sellers pay as much as $10,000 per month to manipulate Amazon search results in favor of their products.
“These fraudulent reviews can crowd out genuine comments and put honest sellers at an unfair disadvantage,” the representatives wrote. “Amazon can and should do more to protect consumers from these deceptive practices and we would like to better understand what measures your company is taking to address this issue.”
Pallone and Schakowsky have requested additional information from Amazon by July 30, including details about how the company identifies and prevents deceptive reviews, which product categories are the most affected by this problem, and how Amazon determines whether to label a product as “Amazon’s Choice.”
(Photo of Jeff Bezos by Seattle City Council used with permission.)
- Panelists Debate Federal Role in Digital Privacy, But Agree Upon Need to Minimize Algorithmic Bias
- FCC ‘Coloring Outside the Lines’ on Broadband Mapping, Say Critics at Next Century Cities Event
- Broadband Advocates at Next Century Cities Emphasize Importance of Building Community Networks
- Advocates for Digital Inclusion Address Different Facets of Bridging the Digital Divide
- New America Highlights the Broadband Prices Available on Ammon, Idaho’s Open Access Network
Signup for Broadband Breakfast
Open Access4 weeks ago
UTOPIA Fiber: A Model Open-Access Network
China2 months ago
Prakash Sangam: China’s Huawei Clones Are Greater Threat to National Security than Huawei
Broadband Mapping & Data3 months ago
Broadband Data From Providers Needs to be Checked With Data From Users, Say Panelists at Mapping Event
Open Access3 months ago
UTOPIA Fiber Announces Partnerships with Morgan, Utah, Idaho Falls, and Other Cities
FCC1 month ago
Telephony Industry Rises to the Challenge of Robocalls, With Legislation, Regulation and Enforcement Close Behind
Education3 months ago
State Educational Technology Officials Say Better Broadband Necessary for Pedagogy and Equity
FCC Workshops2 weeks ago
Indian Tribes Will Have Six-Month Window of Opportunity to Apply for Former EBS Spectrum at 2.5 GigaHertz
FCC2 months ago
As Next Year’s C-Band Auction Looms, FCC Officials Reflect on Innovation in Spectrum Auctions