WASHINGTON, July 11, 2019- As world actors ponder about human expansion into outer space, the issue that most frequently comes up is how to foster innovation while avoiding history’s past mistakes with nation-building.
Human settlement in space is not going to be a “do-over” of our colonial experience, said Andrés Martinez, editorial director at Future Tense, at New America on Wednesday.
Most people think of space settlement as a futuristic enterprise, said Bina Venkataraman, fellow at Future Tense. In their imagination of space communities, she said, they are not looking and learning about issues of governance on our own planet.
Venkataraman said that there is growing concern about the lack of ownership of common resources in space. These commons can potentially be exploited as they cannot be monitored by national jurisdictions.
Although space is an area without sovereignty, that doesn’t mean there can be no property rights, said Henry Hertzfeld, director of the Space Policy Institute.
We want to try and give individuals and companies a chance to explore innovation, he said. However, they should still be liable for that property as space is “not an area without law.”
Behind the structure of the International Space Station, there exists an agreement with a code of conduct between nations. However, Hertzfeld said, treaties between nations are not self-enforcing.
There was also discussion about a possible replacement for the Outer Space Treaty, which prohibits nations from appropriating celestial bodies for colonial and military purposes.
When the treaty was signed in 1967, there was no conceivable capability for further space exploration, said Yuliya Panfil, director of the New America Future of Property Rights program. It seemed inconceivable that private companies like SpaceX could finance such projects.
The first actors able to establish enterprise in space will have a “disproportionate” amount of say in how the area is going to be governed, she said.
Hertzfeld cautioned about declaring outer space as a “global commons” for all, as we are unlikely to have a government authority in space for “a while.”
With so many interests implicated, said Panfil, it is important that the government, private companies as well as civil society have a “seat at a table” to make critical decisions about future space exploration.
(Photo by Masha Abarinova.)
- Lifeline Remains the Best Method for Connecting All Americans, Says FCC’s Geoffrey Starks
- Connectivity and Mobility Are Key Pillars of Metropolitan Development, Say Congresswomen at Smart City Event
- Lawmakers, Prosecutors and Big Tech Companies Spar at Senate Hearing Over Unlocking Encryption
- Advocates for Antitrust Enforcement Say Consumer Welfare Standard Only One Layer of Competition Law
- In Law More Than a Year, MOBILE Now Advocates Say Act Requires Further Implementation for 5G Deployment
Signup for Broadband Breakfast
Antitrust2 months ago
Broadband Roundup: Comcast vs. Google, Sprint’s Open 5G Network, Ransomware Rises
5G3 months ago
Broadband Roundup: CBRS on a Roll, Innovation Fund in Rural California, Another Verizon 5G Announcement
Spectrum2 months ago
Wireless Internet Providers Excited About Multiple Spectrum Sharing Opportunities, Including FCC Priority Access
5G2 months ago
Questions of Public vs. Private Auction and Role of 5G Spectrum Dominate Conference on C-Band
Tribal Broadband3 months ago
Wireless Broadband Likely to be a Key Component in Getting Broadband to Tribal Country
Net Neutrality2 months ago
D.C. Circuit’s Decision in Net Neutrality Case Likely to Open New Fronts of Attack Against FCC
National Broadband Plan2 months ago
Sanders, Warren and Buttigieg: Democratic Presidential Candidates With a Broadband Plan
China3 weeks ago
Prakash Sangam: China’s Huawei Clones Are Greater Threat to National Security than Huawei