WASHINGTON, July 30, 2019 – Disputing the stereotype that the “millennial” generation doesn’t value privacy as much as their elders do, former Rep. Rick Boucher, D-Va., said that the result of a recent survey on attitudes about privacy suggest that it’s time for Congress to act on privacy legislation.
Boucher, the former co-chair of the influential Congressional Internet Caucus and Honorary Chairman of the Internet Innovation Alliance, said on Tuesday that the nation needs a single, nation-wide privacy framework that encompasses the internet.
The survey by CivicScience asked both millennials and older adults which privacy issues concerned them the most.
Examples of issues included hacking of financial data, personal data used for advertising, location data used commercially and whether there should be a national policy addressing consumer data privacy rules.
Sixty-four percent of millennial respondents said that a single, comprehensive privacy law is necessary, and about 75 percent of older adults also agree. Millennials and older adults also scored similarly in the other questions.
The survey results clearly show that millennials highly value online privacy, said Boucher.
However, because millennials grew up with the internet, there is an assumption that they are largely unconcerned with online privacy. These survey results, he said, show that these assumptions are false.
According to the CivicScience report: “It’s rare to find a topic on which the vast majority of Americans agree, let alone when it’s a question of national policy, yet current public opinion on data privacy issues is remarkably aligned.”
With that in mind, Boucher urged legislators to take the next step in privacy legislation.
Several models for a national law are currently in the works. One example is the EU’s opt-in model, in which consumers must give express permission for companies to use their data.
Adopting legislation imposing regulations on every company using personal data will be a golden opportunity for Congress, he said.
However, lawmakers need to ensure that they are not mandating a certain level of encryption of among companies. Rather, companies should be given options of how to make their data collection more secure.
- Advocates for Antitrust Enforcement Say Consumer Welfare Standard Only One Layer of Competition Law
- In Law More Than a Year, MOBILE Now Advocates Say Act Requires Further Implementation for 5G Deployment
- Broadband Roundup: Texas Reaches T-Mobile Settlement, Closing the ‘Homework Gap,’ Broadcast Ownership
- UTOPIA Fiber Announces Completion of Latest Round of Funding, a $48 Million Network Expansion
- Prakash Sangam: China’s Huawei Clones Are Greater Threat to National Security than Huawei
Signup for Broadband Breakfast
Intellectual Property4 months ago
In Congressional Oversight Hearing, Register of Copyrights Says Office Is Responding to Online Users
Broadband Data6 months ago
California Report: Income Most Significant Factor in Low Broadband Adoption
Privacy and Security3 months ago
Comparing Privacy Policies for Wearable Fitness Trackers: Apple, Fitbit, Xiaomi and Under Armour
Antitrust3 months ago
Addressing the Impact of Big Data Upon Antitrust is More Complicated Than a Big Tech Breakup
Expert Opinion5 months ago
Geoff Mulligan: A ‘Dumb’ Way to Build Smart Cities
Antitrust3 months ago
Broadband Roundup: Everyone (Almost) Gangs Up on Google, Muni Broadband Fact Sheet, SHLB Anchornet Conference
Broadband Roundup4 months ago
Cable Industry Touts Energy Efficiency, Next Century Highlights Open Access Fiber, Aspen Forum Set
Broadband's Impact5 months ago
Law Enforcement and Advocates of Facial Recognition Technologies Battle Misconceptions