WASHINGTON, July 24, 2019 — As concern about smart home technology grows, three progressive representatives are planning to introduce a bill this week to ban facial recognition technologies from public housing.
“Surveillance technology is often used to track and control vulnerable communities, particularly communities of color,” wrote Reps. Yvette Clarke, D-NY, Ayanna Pressley, D-Mass., and Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich., in a letter asking for co-sponsors. “The installation of biometric technologies on public housing properties poses an acute risk to those already on the margins.”
The legislation will prohibit the use of facial recognition technology in most public and assisted housing funded by the Department of Housing and Urban Development.
It will also require the department to submit a report to Congress describing any known instance of these technologies already in use in public housing units, the purpose and impact of these technologies, and the demographic information of impacted tenants.
Bipartisan critics have raised concerns over the biases present in facial recognition technologies, which have proven in the past to disproportionately misidentify women and people of color.
“Using this flawed technology as the basis for everything from building access to potential arrest for perceived trespassing thus poses a unique risk to these groups,” the congresswomen wrote. “This unregulated and under-researched technology should be banned in public housing units until additional oversight of its development and deployment is possible.”
Many fear that widespread implementation of such technology also poses a significant threat to privacy. In May, a large group of tenants in New York filed a legal opposition to their landlord’s proposal to install a facial recognition entry system.
“The ability to enter your home should not be conditioned on the surrender of your biometric data, particularly when the landlord's collection, storage, and use of such data is untested and unregulated," said attorney Samar Katnani, who represented the tenants.
Proponents of facial recognition technology argue that it offers residents convenience and safety while keeping down costs for landlords. “Rather than lock out low-income Americans from the latest innovations, Congress should welcome the availability of technology that prevents them from getting locked out of their homes,” said Daniel Castro, vice president of the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, in a statement responding to the bill.
However, the proposed ban has gained significant support from politicians and outside groups on both sides of the aisle.
“Facial recognition surveillance should be banned everywhere, but keeping it out of public housing is an excellent start,” said Evan Greer, deputy director of digital civil rights group Fight for the Future. "If public housing units become a panopticon of automated face scanning and monitoring, it will mean more people in prison, more police abuse, and more families torn apart."
(Image by Mike MacKenzie used with permission.)
- Africa’s Informal Sector Marred by Small Manufacturing Base and Low Technology Adoption, Brookings Experts Say
- Wireless Internet Providers Excited About Multiple Spectrum Sharing Opportunities, Including FCC Priority Access
- FCC Commissioner Geoffrey Starks Gives the Broadband Scoreboard at SHLB: FCC Maps-0, Libraries-1
- Senate Appropriations Subcommittee Tackles Question of Public Versus Private Auction of C-Band Spectrum
- FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr Touts Work on Enhancing Telehealth and Flexible Spectrum
Signup for Broadband Breakfast
Broadband Data5 months ago
Pennsylvania Broadband Speeds Worse Than Previously Believed, According to State Report
Intellectual Property3 months ago
In Congressional Oversight Hearing, Register of Copyrights Says Office Is Responding to Online Users
Broadband Data4 months ago
California Report: Income Most Significant Factor in Low Broadband Adoption
Privacy and Security1 month ago
Comparing Privacy Policies for Wearable Fitness Trackers: Apple, Fitbit, Xiaomi and Under Armour
Antitrust1 month ago
Addressing the Impact of Big Data Upon Antitrust is More Complicated Than a Big Tech Breakup
Expert Opinion3 months ago
Geoff Mulligan: A ‘Dumb’ Way to Build Smart Cities
Antitrust1 month ago
Broadband Roundup: Everyone (Almost) Gangs Up on Google, Muni Broadband Fact Sheet, SHLB Anchornet Conference
Broadband Roundup2 months ago
Cable Industry Touts Energy Efficiency, Next Century Highlights Open Access Fiber, Aspen Forum Set