WASHINGTON, September 10, 2019 – The political world is all abuzz about breaking up big tech companies, but the overly broad breakup remedies being proposed by many are inconsistent with antitrust law as articulated by the Supreme Court, said Taylor Owings, counsel to the Assistant Attorney General for Justice Department’s Antitrust Division.
Speaking on a panel about “Big Data, Digital Platforms and Competition” at Georgetown University’s 2019 Global Antitrust Enforcement Symposium, Owings also said that policymakers need to determine what makes data valuable and how much effort it takes to create it.
Also speaking at the event was Bilal Sayyed, director of the office of policy planning at the Federal Trade Commission. In a keynote address, he highlighted the importance of privacy for antitrust law.
Another question to consider, said Fiona Scott Morton, professor of economics at Yale University, is if big data creates economies of scope and exclusionary conduct. Speaking on the panel with Owings, Morton said that experts cannot easily say that innovation has zero harm on consumers. Any evidence of possible consumer harm must be closely analyzed, she said.
Determining a value on privacy should also be a top priority. Right now, it’s difficult to establish the relationship between competition and privacy, said Matthew Levitt from Baker Botts, another panelist.
There is often a trade-off between the data a user submits and that which they receive, said Kevin Coates, counsel at Covington & Burling.
Gail Levine, deputy director of the Bureau of Competition at the Federal Trade Commission and another panelist, said that a much-debated topical question is whether antitrust agencies are ill-equipped to detect non-price effects of company mergers.
However, she added, competition is still the top priority among federal agencies.
Agencies must take the rights of data holders into account, said Cecilio Madero Villarejo, acting director of the European Commission’s Competition Directorate-General.
Additionally, he said, we must determine the extent to which the ownership of data holders is challenged and how can dispensable information be secured.
- American University President and New America CEO Seek to Clip Edges of America’s Free Speech ‘Absolutism’
- RESILIENT Networks Act for First Responders, Broadband Now on Bad FCC Data, Samsung and Coronavirus
- U.S. Progress on AI and Quantum Computing Will Best China, Says CTO Michael Kratsios
- Poor Broadband Maps and Lack of a Consolidated Voice Hinder Advocacy for Better Rural Internet
- NTIA Broadband Webinar With Pew, Georgia and Tennessee Officials Discuss Solutions to Digital Divides
Signup for Broadband Breakfast
Broadband Data9 months ago
Pennsylvania Broadband Speeds Worse Than Previously Believed, According to State Report
Intellectual Property7 months ago
In Congressional Oversight Hearing, Register of Copyrights Says Office Is Responding to Online Users
Broadband Data8 months ago
California Report: Income Most Significant Factor in Low Broadband Adoption
FCC10 years ago
Telecom Companies Are Using Fight Interrupting Oscar Ceremony Broadcast To Manipulate Public and FCC, Argue Broadcasters
Broadband Roundup7 months ago
Cable Industry Touts Energy Efficiency, Next Century Highlights Open Access Fiber, Aspen Forum Set
Privacy and Security6 months ago
Comparing Privacy Policies for Wearable Fitness Trackers: Apple, Fitbit, Xiaomi and Under Armour
Open Access2 months ago
UTOPIA Fiber: A Model Open-Access Network
Expert Opinion7 months ago
Geoff Mulligan: A ‘Dumb’ Way to Build Smart Cities