WASHINGTON, November 12, 2019 - The advent of artificial intelligence raises the concern of whether online algorithms harm or help user bias, experts said at a Tuesday Brookings panel.
The remarkable lack of transparency is evident in how companies analyze algorithms, said Solon Barocas, information science professor at Cornell University. Before technology became ubiquitous, it was easier for people to recognized blatant discrimination from companies. Now, he said, it’s more difficult to detect these signs from an online platform.
The reasons creditors provide to customers for adverse decisions, Barocas said, are not entirely useful.
The main difficulty is identifying and challenging algorithmic biases in the first place, said Center for Democracy and Technology Analyst Natasha Duarte. What experts do know, she said, is that certain user characteristics impact decisions made by online platforms.
Companies don’t know if algorithms can filter out discrimination, Duarte continued, which is why some organizations have imposed moratoriums on online recognition tools, until proper safeguards have been placed.
It’s not enough for an algorithm to have adequate accuracy, she said. These tools need to be frequently tested to ensure that they can administer appropriate results and prevent the acceptance of low-quality content.
That is especially true for facial recognition technology, as grainy image matching can have an adverse impact. There are multiple aspects to facial recognition that aren’t commonly discussed, said Karl Ricanek, computer science professor at the University of North Carolina, Wilmington.
The umbrella term of facial recognition, he said, is the process of matching a face with another in a different image. Facial analysis, on the other hand, investigate certain attributes of a person’s face to provide a more detailed description. Affective computing can also be used to analyze visible facial expressions.
Despite the vast science behind facial recognition technology, Ricanek said, members in both the public and private sectors don’t completely understand the decisions algorithms make for individuals daily.
Regulators are behind the curve, he said, because they are still trying to understand the most basic technology. Companies are also not performing the necessary due diligence to make sure their algorithms lack bias.
The bottom line, however, said Ricanek, is that current algorithms can’t tell everything that users want to know. Experts should still use common sense and analyze existing literature on the subject. Moreover, there needs to be assurance that machine learning isn’t being used to replace simple solutions that may have more political ramifications.
- Advocates for Antitrust Enforcement Say Consumer Welfare Standard Only One Layer of Competition Law
- In Law More Than a Year, MOBILE Now Advocates Say Act Requires Further Implementation for 5G Deployment
- Broadband Roundup: Texas Reaches T-Mobile Settlement, Closing the ‘Homework Gap,’ Broadcast Ownership
- UTOPIA Fiber Announces Completion of Latest Round of Funding, a $48 Million Network Expansion
- Prakash Sangam: China’s Huawei Clones Are Greater Threat to National Security than Huawei
Signup for Broadband Breakfast
Intellectual Property4 months ago
In Congressional Oversight Hearing, Register of Copyrights Says Office Is Responding to Online Users
Broadband Data6 months ago
California Report: Income Most Significant Factor in Low Broadband Adoption
Privacy and Security3 months ago
Comparing Privacy Policies for Wearable Fitness Trackers: Apple, Fitbit, Xiaomi and Under Armour
Antitrust3 months ago
Addressing the Impact of Big Data Upon Antitrust is More Complicated Than a Big Tech Breakup
Expert Opinion5 months ago
Geoff Mulligan: A ‘Dumb’ Way to Build Smart Cities
Antitrust3 months ago
Broadband Roundup: Everyone (Almost) Gangs Up on Google, Muni Broadband Fact Sheet, SHLB Anchornet Conference
Broadband Roundup4 months ago
Cable Industry Touts Energy Efficiency, Next Century Highlights Open Access Fiber, Aspen Forum Set
Broadband's Impact5 months ago
Law Enforcement and Advocates of Facial Recognition Technologies Battle Misconceptions