WASHINGTON, January 29, 2020 – Federal privacy legislation is necessary to ensure standardization of legal treatment, technology experts said Tuesday at the 2020 State of the Net conference.
On a panel on “Privacy and Preemption” at the annual tech policy gathering, speakers acknowledged the role of the California Consumer Privacy Act in spurring discussion and action. But the CCPA fails to provide rules that are clear to consumers about their rights and clear to businesses about their obligations.
Jessica Rich, former director of the Federal Trade Commission’s Bureau of Consumer Protection, highlighted the irony of a visitor from Nevada to California travelling across the border and facing a situation of vastly different rights. This created a “bad consumer experience,” Rich said.
Chris Calabrese, vice president of the Center for Democracy and Technology, praised Congress’ handling of privacy legislation thus far, citing the seriousness with which representatives have approached the issue in the wake of serious national data breaches.
The panel also addressed where small businesses fit into the tug-of-war of data privacy. Rich said many small businesses can come into contact with sensitive user data and should not be given a free pass in legislation.
“Lest we forget, Cambridge Analytica was a small company,” cracked Jason Albert, Director of Public Policy at Workday.
The panel also defended the FTC against the criticism that it is unfit to enforce data privacy legislation. Albert argued that the FTC has an internationally respected reputation that would be very difficult for a new agency to imitate.
Rich pointed to the fact that the FTC is under-sourced with about only 50 employees assigned to privacy issues for the whole country. Calabrese added to the sentiment by referencing how the Information Commissioner’s Office, Britain’s FTC equivalent, has 500 employees for a nation a quarter the population.
Calabrese also expressed a desire for companies to have the ability to check in with the FTC regarding grey area privacy practices so as to avoid accidental infringement of privacy law.
The moderator capped off the session by asking for the panelists’ predictions as to the future of privacy law. The panel was cautiously optimistic about the future of privacy and believed that the country still had time to sort through the implications that information technologies pose.
- CBRS Crucial Amid Coronavirus Pandemic, Says ConnectX
- EARN IT Act, Impacting Section 230, Advances in Senate with New Encryption Amendment
- Reactions to Moving Forward Act, Increasing Platform Competition, Service Providers Keeping Americans Connected
- Examples of Governments Protecting Free Speech are Many, says German Marshall Fund
- Breakfast Media Minute: July 2, 2020
Signup for Broadband Breakfast
Fiber1 month ago
Fiber Networks Hold a Cybersecurity Advantage Over Rival Co-Axial and Wireless Technologies, Say Panelists
Congress1 month ago
Senators Introduce Healthcare Broadband Bill as House Companion, Proposes $2 Billion Telehealth Expansion
Artificial Intelligence2 weeks ago
Brookings Panelists Emphasize Importance of Addressing Biases in Artificial Intelligence Technology
Congress1 month ago
Partisan Disagreement Delays Broadband Funding That Might Come Through HEROES Act
#broadbandlive2 weeks ago
Broadband Breakfast Live Online on Wednesday, June 17, 2020 – Federal Broadband Funds and Opportunity Zones
Expert Opinion1 month ago
Gary Bolton: Under the Stress of COVID-19, the Networks That Held Fast Were Symmetrical Fiber Broadband
Broadband Roundup4 days ago
Artificial Intelligence Task Force, State Cybersecurity, ADTRAN Offers Rural Funding Guidance
Fiber3 weeks ago
Bandwidth Demands Project 10 Gigabit Network Capabilities Required Next Decade