Privacy
Panelists Call Federal Privacy Legislation Necessary and Express Optimism Toward That Goal

WASHINGTON, January 29, 2020 – Federal privacy legislation is necessary to ensure standardization of legal treatment, technology experts said Tuesday at the 2020 State of the Net conference.
On a panel on “Privacy and Preemption” at the annual tech policy gathering, speakers acknowledged the role of the California Consumer Privacy Act in spurring discussion and action. But the CCPA fails to provide rules that are clear to consumers about their rights and clear to businesses about their obligations.
Jessica Rich, former director of the Federal Trade Commission’s Bureau of Consumer Protection, highlighted the irony of a visitor from Nevada to California travelling across the border and facing a situation of vastly different rights. This created a “bad consumer experience,” Rich said.
Chris Calabrese, vice president of the Center for Democracy and Technology, praised Congress’ handling of privacy legislation thus far, citing the seriousness with which representatives have approached the issue in the wake of serious national data breaches.
The panel also addressed where small businesses fit into the tug-of-war of data privacy. Rich said many small businesses can come into contact with sensitive user data and should not be given a free pass in legislation.
“Lest we forget, Cambridge Analytica was a small company,” cracked Jason Albert, Director of Public Policy at Workday.
The panel also defended the FTC against the criticism that it is unfit to enforce data privacy legislation. Albert argued that the FTC has an internationally respected reputation that would be very difficult for a new agency to imitate.
Rich pointed to the fact that the FTC is under-sourced with about only 50 employees assigned to privacy issues for the whole country. Calabrese added to the sentiment by referencing how the Information Commissioner’s Office, Britain’s FTC equivalent, has 500 employees for a nation a quarter the population.
Calabrese also expressed a desire for companies to have the ability to check in with the FTC regarding grey area privacy practices so as to avoid accidental infringement of privacy law.
The moderator capped off the session by asking for the panelists’ predictions as to the future of privacy law. The panel was cautiously optimistic about the future of privacy and believed that the country still had time to sort through the implications that information technologies pose.
Big Tech
Consumers Lack Understanding About Financial Privacy Ramifications of Using Bitcoin, Experts Say

WASHINGTON, January 29, 2020 – Federal privacy legislation is necessary to ensure standardization of legal treatment, technology experts said Tuesday at the 2020 State of the Net conference.
On a panel on “Privacy and Preemption” at the annual tech policy gathering, speakers acknowledged the role of the California Consumer Privacy Act in spurring discussion and action. But the CCPA fails to provide rules that are clear to consumers about their rights and clear to businesses about their obligations.
Jessica Rich, former director of the Federal Trade Commission’s Bureau of Consumer Protection, highlighted the irony of a visitor from Nevada to California travelling across the border and facing a situation of vastly different rights. This created a “bad consumer experience,” Rich said.
Chris Calabrese, vice president of the Center for Democracy and Technology, praised Congress’ handling of privacy legislation thus far, citing the seriousness with which representatives have approached the issue in the wake of serious national data breaches.
The panel also addressed where small businesses fit into the tug-of-war of data privacy. Rich said many small businesses can come into contact with sensitive user data and should not be given a free pass in legislation.
“Lest we forget, Cambridge Analytica was a small company,” cracked Jason Albert, Director of Public Policy at Workday.
The panel also defended the FTC against the criticism that it is unfit to enforce data privacy legislation. Albert argued that the FTC has an internationally respected reputation that would be very difficult for a new agency to imitate.
Rich pointed to the fact that the FTC is under-sourced with about only 50 employees assigned to privacy issues for the whole country. Calabrese added to the sentiment by referencing how the Information Commissioner’s Office, Britain’s FTC equivalent, has 500 employees for a nation a quarter the population.
Calabrese also expressed a desire for companies to have the ability to check in with the FTC regarding grey area privacy practices so as to avoid accidental infringement of privacy law.
The moderator capped off the session by asking for the panelists’ predictions as to the future of privacy law. The panel was cautiously optimistic about the future of privacy and believed that the country still had time to sort through the implications that information technologies pose.
Cybersecurity
Senate Looks for Answers During First Public Hearing on SolarWinds Cyber Attack

WASHINGTON, January 29, 2020 – Federal privacy legislation is necessary to ensure standardization of legal treatment, technology experts said Tuesday at the 2020 State of the Net conference.
On a panel on “Privacy and Preemption” at the annual tech policy gathering, speakers acknowledged the role of the California Consumer Privacy Act in spurring discussion and action. But the CCPA fails to provide rules that are clear to consumers about their rights and clear to businesses about their obligations.
Jessica Rich, former director of the Federal Trade Commission’s Bureau of Consumer Protection, highlighted the irony of a visitor from Nevada to California travelling across the border and facing a situation of vastly different rights. This created a “bad consumer experience,” Rich said.
Chris Calabrese, vice president of the Center for Democracy and Technology, praised Congress’ handling of privacy legislation thus far, citing the seriousness with which representatives have approached the issue in the wake of serious national data breaches.
The panel also addressed where small businesses fit into the tug-of-war of data privacy. Rich said many small businesses can come into contact with sensitive user data and should not be given a free pass in legislation.
“Lest we forget, Cambridge Analytica was a small company,” cracked Jason Albert, Director of Public Policy at Workday.
The panel also defended the FTC against the criticism that it is unfit to enforce data privacy legislation. Albert argued that the FTC has an internationally respected reputation that would be very difficult for a new agency to imitate.
Rich pointed to the fact that the FTC is under-sourced with about only 50 employees assigned to privacy issues for the whole country. Calabrese added to the sentiment by referencing how the Information Commissioner’s Office, Britain’s FTC equivalent, has 500 employees for a nation a quarter the population.
Calabrese also expressed a desire for companies to have the ability to check in with the FTC regarding grey area privacy practices so as to avoid accidental infringement of privacy law.
The moderator capped off the session by asking for the panelists’ predictions as to the future of privacy law. The panel was cautiously optimistic about the future of privacy and believed that the country still had time to sort through the implications that information technologies pose.
Cybersecurity
SolarWinds CEO Says Hack Shows Need for Information-Sharing Between Industry and Government

WASHINGTON, January 29, 2020 – Federal privacy legislation is necessary to ensure standardization of legal treatment, technology experts said Tuesday at the 2020 State of the Net conference.
On a panel on “Privacy and Preemption” at the annual tech policy gathering, speakers acknowledged the role of the California Consumer Privacy Act in spurring discussion and action. But the CCPA fails to provide rules that are clear to consumers about their rights and clear to businesses about their obligations.
Jessica Rich, former director of the Federal Trade Commission’s Bureau of Consumer Protection, highlighted the irony of a visitor from Nevada to California travelling across the border and facing a situation of vastly different rights. This created a “bad consumer experience,” Rich said.
Chris Calabrese, vice president of the Center for Democracy and Technology, praised Congress’ handling of privacy legislation thus far, citing the seriousness with which representatives have approached the issue in the wake of serious national data breaches.
The panel also addressed where small businesses fit into the tug-of-war of data privacy. Rich said many small businesses can come into contact with sensitive user data and should not be given a free pass in legislation.
“Lest we forget, Cambridge Analytica was a small company,” cracked Jason Albert, Director of Public Policy at Workday.
The panel also defended the FTC against the criticism that it is unfit to enforce data privacy legislation. Albert argued that the FTC has an internationally respected reputation that would be very difficult for a new agency to imitate.
Rich pointed to the fact that the FTC is under-sourced with about only 50 employees assigned to privacy issues for the whole country. Calabrese added to the sentiment by referencing how the Information Commissioner’s Office, Britain’s FTC equivalent, has 500 employees for a nation a quarter the population.
Calabrese also expressed a desire for companies to have the ability to check in with the FTC regarding grey area privacy practices so as to avoid accidental infringement of privacy law.
The moderator capped off the session by asking for the panelists’ predictions as to the future of privacy law. The panel was cautiously optimistic about the future of privacy and believed that the country still had time to sort through the implications that information technologies pose.
-
Artificial Intelligence3 months ago
U.S. Special Operations Command Employs AI and Machine Learning to Improve Operations
-
Broadband Roundup3 months ago
Benton on Middle Mile Open Access Networks, CENIC Fiber Route in California, Investors Buying Bitcoin
-
Section 2304 months ago
President Trump’s FCC Nominee Grilled on Section 230 During Senate Confirmation Hearing
-
Artificial Intelligence2 months ago
Artificial Intelligence Aims to Enhance Human Capabilities, But Only With Caution and Safeguards
-
Broadband Roundup3 months ago
Trump Signs Executive Order on Artificial Intelligence, How Not to Wreck the FCC, Broadband Performance in Europe
-
5G4 months ago
5G Stands to Impact Industry Before Consumers, Says Verizon CEO Hans Vestberg
-
Fiber2 months ago
Smaller Internet Providers Were Instrumental to Fiber Deployment in 2020, Says Fiber Broadband Association
-
#broadbandlive3 months ago
Broadband Breakfast Live Online Event Series on ‘Tools for Broadband Deployment’ on Enhancing Rural America