Connect with us

Antitrust

Justice Department Antitrust Chief Pledges Department is ‘Getting Better,’ Talks Up T-Mobile Merger Approval

David Jelke

Published

on

Photo of Makan Delrahim at the Media Institute event by David Jelke

WASHINGTON, February 6, 2020 – Assistant Attorney General Makan Delrahim surveyed the antitrust and merger landscape from the Crystal Room of the Willard Hotel using the example of the T-Mobile/Sprint merger. He defended it for allowing rural communities to have better broadband.

Delrahim, who oversees that antitrust division of the Justice Department, played a key role in shepherding the merger along.

Delrahim has said he would have refused to allow the number of national wireless carriers to shrink from four to three, and that he only permitted T-Mobile’s acquisition because of Dish Network’s involvement in buying certain T-Mobile assets.

See “Justice Department Collaborating with State Attorneys General’s Antitrust Investigation of Big Tech, Says Chief,” from Broadband Breakfast, August 20, 2019.

Notwithstanding the approval by the Justice Department and the Federal Communications Commission, about 15 states are continuing to challenge the merger in court.

Delrahim argued that the merger was ultimately beneficial to consumers. Specifically, he said the department found that the telecommunications merger would allow consumers, especially those in underserved rural communities, to benefit from the increased availability in 5G.

Lastly, Delrahim insisted that the merger would bring health, safety, and quality to the rural population, and that previously unused spectrum of Dish Networks would now be available to consumers.

Delrahim referenced a requirement that the companies agreed to of servicing at least 99 percent of rural populations. He also said it was approved because, conversely, it didn’t harm consumers by restricting competition.

Delrahim emphasized the Justice Department’s commitment to open communication with corporations.

In fact, in an attempt to highlight these improvements in bureaucratic communication, he titled his speech “Getting Better” by the Beatles.

He touted the department’s publishing of a Model Voluntary Request Letter, which he said makes it easier and more transparent to deal with the department in investigations.

He also touted how Justice has consistently beat its “six-month investigation pledge,” averaging 5.7 months from the moment companies proposed a merger to when it is either approved or rejected by the agency.

He conceded that some cases went beyond the six-month limit, but that these were either due to external factors or the corporations themselves being slow to produce relevant documents.

Delrahim said he recognizes that any prolongment of this process hurts companies bottom line which is why the the department has “taken concrete steps to minimize delay” and minimize uncertainty.

Asked about the department’s antitrust investigation of Google, Delrahim referenced his recently-announced recusal from the case and pivoted back to addressing the T-Mobile/Sprint merger.

Antitrust

Google Hit With Third Antitrust Lawsuit, This One by Both Democratic and Republican Attorneys General

Jericho Casper

Published

on

Photo of Google CEO Sundar Pichai

WASHINGTON, February 6, 2020 – Assistant Attorney General Makan Delrahim surveyed the antitrust and merger landscape from the Crystal Room of the Willard Hotel using the example of the T-Mobile/Sprint merger. He defended it for allowing rural communities to have better broadband.

Delrahim, who oversees that antitrust division of the Justice Department, played a key role in shepherding the merger along.

Delrahim has said he would have refused to allow the number of national wireless carriers to shrink from four to three, and that he only permitted T-Mobile’s acquisition because of Dish Network’s involvement in buying certain T-Mobile assets.

See “Justice Department Collaborating with State Attorneys General’s Antitrust Investigation of Big Tech, Says Chief,” from Broadband Breakfast, August 20, 2019.

Notwithstanding the approval by the Justice Department and the Federal Communications Commission, about 15 states are continuing to challenge the merger in court.

Delrahim argued that the merger was ultimately beneficial to consumers. Specifically, he said the department found that the telecommunications merger would allow consumers, especially those in underserved rural communities, to benefit from the increased availability in 5G.

Lastly, Delrahim insisted that the merger would bring health, safety, and quality to the rural population, and that previously unused spectrum of Dish Networks would now be available to consumers.

Delrahim referenced a requirement that the companies agreed to of servicing at least 99 percent of rural populations. He also said it was approved because, conversely, it didn’t harm consumers by restricting competition.

Delrahim emphasized the Justice Department’s commitment to open communication with corporations.

In fact, in an attempt to highlight these improvements in bureaucratic communication, he titled his speech “Getting Better” by the Beatles.

He touted the department’s publishing of a Model Voluntary Request Letter, which he said makes it easier and more transparent to deal with the department in investigations.

He also touted how Justice has consistently beat its “six-month investigation pledge,” averaging 5.7 months from the moment companies proposed a merger to when it is either approved or rejected by the agency.

He conceded that some cases went beyond the six-month limit, but that these were either due to external factors or the corporations themselves being slow to produce relevant documents.

Delrahim said he recognizes that any prolongment of this process hurts companies bottom line which is why the the department has “taken concrete steps to minimize delay” and minimize uncertainty.

Asked about the department’s antitrust investigation of Google, Delrahim referenced his recently-announced recusal from the case and pivoted back to addressing the T-Mobile/Sprint merger.

Continue Reading

Antitrust

FTC and Almost All States Launch Antitrust Suit Against Facebook, Seek Divestment of Instagram and WhatsApp

Jericho Casper

Published

on

Screenshot of New York Attorney General Letitia James on Wednesday

WASHINGTON, February 6, 2020 – Assistant Attorney General Makan Delrahim surveyed the antitrust and merger landscape from the Crystal Room of the Willard Hotel using the example of the T-Mobile/Sprint merger. He defended it for allowing rural communities to have better broadband.

Delrahim, who oversees that antitrust division of the Justice Department, played a key role in shepherding the merger along.

Delrahim has said he would have refused to allow the number of national wireless carriers to shrink from four to three, and that he only permitted T-Mobile’s acquisition because of Dish Network’s involvement in buying certain T-Mobile assets.

See “Justice Department Collaborating with State Attorneys General’s Antitrust Investigation of Big Tech, Says Chief,” from Broadband Breakfast, August 20, 2019.

Notwithstanding the approval by the Justice Department and the Federal Communications Commission, about 15 states are continuing to challenge the merger in court.

Delrahim argued that the merger was ultimately beneficial to consumers. Specifically, he said the department found that the telecommunications merger would allow consumers, especially those in underserved rural communities, to benefit from the increased availability in 5G.

Lastly, Delrahim insisted that the merger would bring health, safety, and quality to the rural population, and that previously unused spectrum of Dish Networks would now be available to consumers.

Delrahim referenced a requirement that the companies agreed to of servicing at least 99 percent of rural populations. He also said it was approved because, conversely, it didn’t harm consumers by restricting competition.

Delrahim emphasized the Justice Department’s commitment to open communication with corporations.

In fact, in an attempt to highlight these improvements in bureaucratic communication, he titled his speech “Getting Better” by the Beatles.

He touted the department’s publishing of a Model Voluntary Request Letter, which he said makes it easier and more transparent to deal with the department in investigations.

He also touted how Justice has consistently beat its “six-month investigation pledge,” averaging 5.7 months from the moment companies proposed a merger to when it is either approved or rejected by the agency.

He conceded that some cases went beyond the six-month limit, but that these were either due to external factors or the corporations themselves being slow to produce relevant documents.

Delrahim said he recognizes that any prolongment of this process hurts companies bottom line which is why the the department has “taken concrete steps to minimize delay” and minimize uncertainty.

Asked about the department’s antitrust investigation of Google, Delrahim referenced his recently-announced recusal from the case and pivoted back to addressing the T-Mobile/Sprint merger.

Continue Reading

Antitrust

Biden Administration Should Take a Trial-and-Error Approach to Antitrust, Say Brookings Panelists

Jericho Casper

Published

on

Photo of Matt Perault testifying before Congress from Brown Political Review

WASHINGTON, February 6, 2020 – Assistant Attorney General Makan Delrahim surveyed the antitrust and merger landscape from the Crystal Room of the Willard Hotel using the example of the T-Mobile/Sprint merger. He defended it for allowing rural communities to have better broadband.

Delrahim, who oversees that antitrust division of the Justice Department, played a key role in shepherding the merger along.

Delrahim has said he would have refused to allow the number of national wireless carriers to shrink from four to three, and that he only permitted T-Mobile’s acquisition because of Dish Network’s involvement in buying certain T-Mobile assets.

See “Justice Department Collaborating with State Attorneys General’s Antitrust Investigation of Big Tech, Says Chief,” from Broadband Breakfast, August 20, 2019.

Notwithstanding the approval by the Justice Department and the Federal Communications Commission, about 15 states are continuing to challenge the merger in court.

Delrahim argued that the merger was ultimately beneficial to consumers. Specifically, he said the department found that the telecommunications merger would allow consumers, especially those in underserved rural communities, to benefit from the increased availability in 5G.

Lastly, Delrahim insisted that the merger would bring health, safety, and quality to the rural population, and that previously unused spectrum of Dish Networks would now be available to consumers.

Delrahim referenced a requirement that the companies agreed to of servicing at least 99 percent of rural populations. He also said it was approved because, conversely, it didn’t harm consumers by restricting competition.

Delrahim emphasized the Justice Department’s commitment to open communication with corporations.

In fact, in an attempt to highlight these improvements in bureaucratic communication, he titled his speech “Getting Better” by the Beatles.

He touted the department’s publishing of a Model Voluntary Request Letter, which he said makes it easier and more transparent to deal with the department in investigations.

He also touted how Justice has consistently beat its “six-month investigation pledge,” averaging 5.7 months from the moment companies proposed a merger to when it is either approved or rejected by the agency.

He conceded that some cases went beyond the six-month limit, but that these were either due to external factors or the corporations themselves being slow to produce relevant documents.

Delrahim said he recognizes that any prolongment of this process hurts companies bottom line which is why the the department has “taken concrete steps to minimize delay” and minimize uncertainty.

Asked about the department’s antitrust investigation of Google, Delrahim referenced his recently-announced recusal from the case and pivoted back to addressing the T-Mobile/Sprint merger.

Continue Reading

Recent

Signup for Broadband Breakfast

Get twice-weekly Breakfast Media news alerts.
* = required field

Trending