WASHINGTON, February 18, 2020 – Technology industry officials unloaded on what they regard as the Trump administration’s excessive measures against the Chinese company Huawei, officials said Tuesday at an Information Technology and Innovation Foundation panel on export controls.
“Unilateral actions end up hurting the very U.S. industry you are trying to protect,” said Kevin Wolf of Akin Gump Strauss Hauer and Feld.
Wolf said that export control law called for imposition upon items that are considered “essential” to national security. Wolf said that didn’t apply to Huawei gear.
The Trump administration has placed many controls on technological products that seem to have no bearing on national security, such as chips in smartphones, according to John Neuffer of SIA America.
According to Wolf, the administration has also yet to clarify the difference between “emerging” and “digital” technologies, as stated in the Export Control Reform Act passed in August 2018. The measure strengthened export controls in apparent response to the perceived threat from Chinese companies.
Robert Atkinson, president of ITIF and moderator of the panel, claimed that government officials are suffering from HDS, or “Huawei Derangement Syndrome.” Atkinson used this phrase to describe the heavy-handedness of the government in banning export of a broad array of products to China.
“As someone who used to see the intel,” chimed Wolf, who worked in intelligence prior to his current position, he is “quite sympathetic with the desire to do something” about Huawei.
That being said, the tools of export control can be “more harmful than helpful,” and he thinks this is the case now.
A humorous moment occurred when Wolf read out the following live tweets from President Trump:
In addition to garnering laughs, Wolf used the tweet to bolster his argument that the current administration has a capricious stance on Huawei. This ambiguity impairs the U.S.’s credibility and “discourage[s] nations that want to do business with the U.S.”
In response to a question about the U.S.’s efforts to prevent allied countries from adopting Huawei infrastructure, David Hanke of Arent Fox stated “if you attack the king you gotta kill the king, and it’s not clear to me that you can do that.”
The audience responded with nervous laughter.
- Online Speech Has Harmful Effects on Both Individuals and Society, According to Mary Anne Franks
- Pandemic Has Created an Environment for Consumer Fraud, Say Congressional Leaders
- Breakfast Media Minute: July 10, 2020
- Metrics and Automation Can Improve Federal Cybersecurity Measures
- Federal Communications Commission Must Reconsider Ligado Offer, Says Former Commissioner
Signup for Broadband Breakfast
Fiber1 month ago
Fiber Networks Hold a Cybersecurity Advantage Over Rival Co-Axial and Wireless Technologies, Say Panelists
Artificial Intelligence3 weeks ago
Brookings Panelists Emphasize Importance of Addressing Biases in Artificial Intelligence Technology
Artificial Intelligence2 weeks ago
U.S. State Department Employing Artificial Intelligence Against COVID-19 Misinformation
Congress1 month ago
Partisan Disagreement Delays Broadband Funding That Might Come Through HEROES Act
Broadband Roundup2 weeks ago
Artificial Intelligence Task Force, State Cybersecurity, ADTRAN Offers Rural Funding Guidance
#broadbandlive4 weeks ago
Broadband Breakfast Live Online on Wednesday, June 17, 2020 – Federal Broadband Funds and Opportunity Zones
Expert Opinion1 month ago
Gary Bolton: Under the Stress of COVID-19, the Networks That Held Fast Were Symmetrical Fiber Broadband
Education2 weeks ago
A Mix of Resources and Technologies Are Needed to Close the Homework Gap