Antitrust
Information Technology and Innovation Foundation Brings Global Antitrust Experts Together in Videoconference

March 26, 2020 – Washington groups focusing on broadband and technology policy are beginning to adapt to the all-livestream format – and recognizing some unique benefits – such a fluid global interconnectedness.
For example, in the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation’s Thursday antitrust seminar on Zoom, the group hostedSt Mary’s University Senior Lecturer in Law Aurelien Portuese from France and Berkeley Research Group Chairman David Teece, who was in New Zealand.
While it was 4:30 in the morning in New Zealand when Teece joined, and with Portuese was tuning in during the evening, engaging in robust conversations with panelists 12 hours apart may quickly become the new normal for policy experts during the coronavirus pandemic and beyond.
Portuese and Teece teased out the shortcomings of current antitrust laws—laws that Teece deems ripe for alteration.
Antitrust is “excessively precautionary,” said Portuese.
“Clearly, this precautionary approach is dangerous,” and the innovation principles should be “embraced,” said Portuese.
Teece sees two main issues with antitrust policies in the United States and Europe. Antitrust is “excessively static and short-run, and it’s not integrated with trade policy,” said Teece.
“Innovation supports competition,” which is grossly misunderstood, argued Teece.
Consumer welfare should be examined in the long-term, said Teece.
China is only serious about global competition and economic strength, said Teece. China uses antitrust as a “tool against foreign competitors.”
Teece chastised the United States for being naïve when it comes to China.
Teece advocated a wholescale rethinking of antitrust law. Lawmakers and governments around the world have been hyper-focused on big tech recently. But big tech is still competing “vigorously” against each other, said Teece.
Competition in the “digital economy” is entirely different, and those who decry monopolies, are missing the point, said Teece.
“Antitrust is too short-term,” agreed ITIF President Robert Atkinson.
Panelists agreed that innovation is siloed, and antitrust should focus on innovation and long-term variables.
Antitrust regulators must accept “the very idea of non-evidenced efficiency gains” because “innovation is hard to demonstrate,” insisted Portuese, arguing that innovation is “subtle.”
Media Ownership
Pandemic Isn’t Death Knell Of Theaters, Says Lionsgate Vice Chairman

March 26, 2020 – Washington groups focusing on broadband and technology policy are beginning to adapt to the all-livestream format – and recognizing some unique benefits – such a fluid global interconnectedness.
For example, in the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation’s Thursday antitrust seminar on Zoom, the group hostedSt Mary’s University Senior Lecturer in Law Aurelien Portuese from France and Berkeley Research Group Chairman David Teece, who was in New Zealand.
While it was 4:30 in the morning in New Zealand when Teece joined, and with Portuese was tuning in during the evening, engaging in robust conversations with panelists 12 hours apart may quickly become the new normal for policy experts during the coronavirus pandemic and beyond.
Portuese and Teece teased out the shortcomings of current antitrust laws—laws that Teece deems ripe for alteration.
Antitrust is “excessively precautionary,” said Portuese.
“Clearly, this precautionary approach is dangerous,” and the innovation principles should be “embraced,” said Portuese.
Teece sees two main issues with antitrust policies in the United States and Europe. Antitrust is “excessively static and short-run, and it’s not integrated with trade policy,” said Teece.
“Innovation supports competition,” which is grossly misunderstood, argued Teece.
Consumer welfare should be examined in the long-term, said Teece.
China is only serious about global competition and economic strength, said Teece. China uses antitrust as a “tool against foreign competitors.”
Teece chastised the United States for being naïve when it comes to China.
Teece advocated a wholescale rethinking of antitrust law. Lawmakers and governments around the world have been hyper-focused on big tech recently. But big tech is still competing “vigorously” against each other, said Teece.
Competition in the “digital economy” is entirely different, and those who decry monopolies, are missing the point, said Teece.
“Antitrust is too short-term,” agreed ITIF President Robert Atkinson.
Panelists agreed that innovation is siloed, and antitrust should focus on innovation and long-term variables.
Antitrust regulators must accept “the very idea of non-evidenced efficiency gains” because “innovation is hard to demonstrate,” insisted Portuese, arguing that innovation is “subtle.”
Media Ownership
News Organizations Must Have a Broad Representation in the Communities They Cover

March 26, 2020 – Washington groups focusing on broadband and technology policy are beginning to adapt to the all-livestream format – and recognizing some unique benefits – such a fluid global interconnectedness.
For example, in the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation’s Thursday antitrust seminar on Zoom, the group hostedSt Mary’s University Senior Lecturer in Law Aurelien Portuese from France and Berkeley Research Group Chairman David Teece, who was in New Zealand.
While it was 4:30 in the morning in New Zealand when Teece joined, and with Portuese was tuning in during the evening, engaging in robust conversations with panelists 12 hours apart may quickly become the new normal for policy experts during the coronavirus pandemic and beyond.
Portuese and Teece teased out the shortcomings of current antitrust laws—laws that Teece deems ripe for alteration.
Antitrust is “excessively precautionary,” said Portuese.
“Clearly, this precautionary approach is dangerous,” and the innovation principles should be “embraced,” said Portuese.
Teece sees two main issues with antitrust policies in the United States and Europe. Antitrust is “excessively static and short-run, and it’s not integrated with trade policy,” said Teece.
“Innovation supports competition,” which is grossly misunderstood, argued Teece.
Consumer welfare should be examined in the long-term, said Teece.
China is only serious about global competition and economic strength, said Teece. China uses antitrust as a “tool against foreign competitors.”
Teece chastised the United States for being naïve when it comes to China.
Teece advocated a wholescale rethinking of antitrust law. Lawmakers and governments around the world have been hyper-focused on big tech recently. But big tech is still competing “vigorously” against each other, said Teece.
Competition in the “digital economy” is entirely different, and those who decry monopolies, are missing the point, said Teece.
“Antitrust is too short-term,” agreed ITIF President Robert Atkinson.
Panelists agreed that innovation is siloed, and antitrust should focus on innovation and long-term variables.
Antitrust regulators must accept “the very idea of non-evidenced efficiency gains” because “innovation is hard to demonstrate,” insisted Portuese, arguing that innovation is “subtle.”
Antitrust
America Facing Consequences From Years of Inaction on Antitrust, Says Former FCC Chairman

March 26, 2020 – Washington groups focusing on broadband and technology policy are beginning to adapt to the all-livestream format – and recognizing some unique benefits – such a fluid global interconnectedness.
For example, in the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation’s Thursday antitrust seminar on Zoom, the group hostedSt Mary’s University Senior Lecturer in Law Aurelien Portuese from France and Berkeley Research Group Chairman David Teece, who was in New Zealand.
While it was 4:30 in the morning in New Zealand when Teece joined, and with Portuese was tuning in during the evening, engaging in robust conversations with panelists 12 hours apart may quickly become the new normal for policy experts during the coronavirus pandemic and beyond.
Portuese and Teece teased out the shortcomings of current antitrust laws—laws that Teece deems ripe for alteration.
Antitrust is “excessively precautionary,” said Portuese.
“Clearly, this precautionary approach is dangerous,” and the innovation principles should be “embraced,” said Portuese.
Teece sees two main issues with antitrust policies in the United States and Europe. Antitrust is “excessively static and short-run, and it’s not integrated with trade policy,” said Teece.
“Innovation supports competition,” which is grossly misunderstood, argued Teece.
Consumer welfare should be examined in the long-term, said Teece.
China is only serious about global competition and economic strength, said Teece. China uses antitrust as a “tool against foreign competitors.”
Teece chastised the United States for being naïve when it comes to China.
Teece advocated a wholescale rethinking of antitrust law. Lawmakers and governments around the world have been hyper-focused on big tech recently. But big tech is still competing “vigorously” against each other, said Teece.
Competition in the “digital economy” is entirely different, and those who decry monopolies, are missing the point, said Teece.
“Antitrust is too short-term,” agreed ITIF President Robert Atkinson.
Panelists agreed that innovation is siloed, and antitrust should focus on innovation and long-term variables.
Antitrust regulators must accept “the very idea of non-evidenced efficiency gains” because “innovation is hard to demonstrate,” insisted Portuese, arguing that innovation is “subtle.”
-
Artificial Intelligence3 months ago
U.S. Special Operations Command Employs AI and Machine Learning to Improve Operations
-
Broadband Roundup3 months ago
Benton on Middle Mile Open Access Networks, CENIC Fiber Route in California, Investors Buying Bitcoin
-
Section 2304 months ago
President Trump’s FCC Nominee Grilled on Section 230 During Senate Confirmation Hearing
-
Artificial Intelligence1 month ago
Artificial Intelligence Aims to Enhance Human Capabilities, But Only With Caution and Safeguards
-
Broadband Roundup3 months ago
Trump Signs Executive Order on Artificial Intelligence, How Not to Wreck the FCC, Broadband Performance in Europe
-
5G3 months ago
5G Stands to Impact Industry Before Consumers, Says Verizon CEO Hans Vestberg
-
Fiber2 months ago
Smaller Internet Providers Were Instrumental to Fiber Deployment in 2020, Says Fiber Broadband Association
-
#broadbandlive3 months ago
Broadband Breakfast Live Online Event Series on ‘Tools for Broadband Deployment’ on Enhancing Rural America