June 5, 2020 — The rise of telehealth across the country could mean a lack of privacy for its users, said participants in an LBJ School webinar Wednesday.
Speaking to the organization about the privacy risks posed by the increasingly widespread use of remote healthcare technologies, panelists said that the invasiveness of such tech could make patients reluctant to use the it at all.
Tony Grubesic, professor and associate dean for research in the School of Information at the University of Texas at Austin, said that a practical example of telehealth privacy concerns was postnatal care.
Women who see doctors for breastfeeding monitoring could feel uncomfortable with having such personal matters conveyed online, he said.
“There are a lot of people who just refuse to participate because they don't want this information transmitted over the internet,” he said.
Remote healthcare usage has risen drastically in recent years and has only multiplied amid the coronavirus. Hospitals like Mount Sinai in New York City have employed machine learning technologies to track reported cases of coronavirus and care for patients from afar.
Many experts say that technology like this could revolutionize healthcare and provide faster services to patients. But, despite its many promises, its future is unclear and may be turbulent.
The other issue that faces telehealth is unequal access.
Kenneth Flamm, LBJ professor of public affairs, said that large rural portions of the country, have extremely limited options for broadband access, if they even have access at all.
“On the order of almost 40 percent of rural census blocks are monopolies with only a single fixed wire line and wireless provider,” he said.
Despite rising telehealth usage, Grubesic said, remote healthcare is not likely to replace physical healthcare any time soon. In some areas, broadband access is scant and more challenging to access than a brick-and-mortar doctor’s office.
This could divide access to telehealth along lines of income or location, he explained.
“Quarantine has really illustrated ways in which we’ve taken broadband access for granted,” said Sharon Strover, communications professor at the University of Texas.
The participants agreed that the future of broadband access and the technologies it enables will be diverse and virtually unpredictable.
“Just like everything, broadband is a mixed bag of outcomes, drivers, issues of equity and equality,” Grubesic said. “So it’s really going to be laid out over the span of decades, not in the next two, three years.”
- Online Speech Has Harmful Effects on Both Individuals and Society, According to Mary Anne Franks
- Pandemic Has Created an Environment for Consumer Fraud, Say Congressional Leaders
- Breakfast Media Minute: July 10, 2020
- Metrics and Automation Can Improve Federal Cybersecurity Measures
- Federal Communications Commission Must Reconsider Ligado Offer, Says Former Commissioner
Signup for Broadband Breakfast
Fiber1 month ago
Fiber Networks Hold a Cybersecurity Advantage Over Rival Co-Axial and Wireless Technologies, Say Panelists
Artificial Intelligence3 weeks ago
Brookings Panelists Emphasize Importance of Addressing Biases in Artificial Intelligence Technology
Artificial Intelligence2 weeks ago
U.S. State Department Employing Artificial Intelligence Against COVID-19 Misinformation
Congress1 month ago
Partisan Disagreement Delays Broadband Funding That Might Come Through HEROES Act
Broadband Roundup2 weeks ago
Artificial Intelligence Task Force, State Cybersecurity, ADTRAN Offers Rural Funding Guidance
#broadbandlive4 weeks ago
Broadband Breakfast Live Online on Wednesday, June 17, 2020 – Federal Broadband Funds and Opportunity Zones
Expert Opinion1 month ago
Gary Bolton: Under the Stress of COVID-19, the Networks That Held Fast Were Symmetrical Fiber Broadband
Education2 weeks ago
A Mix of Resources and Technologies Are Needed to Close the Homework Gap