Infrastructure
Michigan Broadband Cooperative Calls Report Saying Municipal Broadband Has an Unfair Advantage ‘Laughable’

June 30, 2020 — The Michigan Broadband Cooperative is hitting back at a report from the Free State Foundation that claims that local governments in Michigan frequently abuse broadband restrictions placed on them.
Theodore Bolema, professor of economics at Wichita State University, wrote that the governments’ unfair treatment allowed them to take advantage of regulatory privileges.
“Local governments’ purported compliance with the law was achieved by tilting the playing field to give municipal networks advantages over private market providers through subsidies, self-dealing, or privileged regulatory treatment,” he wrote.
He also claimed that a new bill under consideration by the Michigan Congress would exacerbate the alleged abuses.
“This preferential treatment of municipal networks deters entry and investment by private providers to the detriment of competition and, therefore, consumers,” he said.
But Ben Fineman of the Michigan Broadband Cooperative called the writing a hit piece and said that government broadband providers stepped in to fill a need not met by private industry.
“What alternative is the author suggesting?” he asked. “Should Lyndon residents have continued waiting patiently for more decades until a private provider stops ‘considering’ expanding and actually does something?”
Despite the report’s claims, Fineman said, there is in fact a private provider in the concerned area.
According to Bolema, government providers in Holland, Michigan have been unfairly enabled to compete with incumbent providers.
“Holland helped undercut private companies by subsidizing its broadband systems with a transfer from other city funds to help with start-up costs,” he said.
Fineman dismissed Bolema’s assertions as “laughable.”
“The townships who would leverage special assessment districts for broadband are those with significant populations without broadband access,” he said.
Bolema’s ten-page memo details other alleged abuses of the Michigan public broadband networks, but Fineman denied them, saying that because of the number of refutations, he “simply [did not] have time to address them all.”
Since the coronavirus pandemic, government agencies like the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the Federal Communications Commission have given millions of dollars to public infrastructure development and auctions for increased private service.
Broadband Mapping & Data
Broadband Breakfast Interview with BroadbandNow about Lower Costs and Lower Latency

June 30, 2020 — The Michigan Broadband Cooperative is hitting back at a report from the Free State Foundation that claims that local governments in Michigan frequently abuse broadband restrictions placed on them.
Theodore Bolema, professor of economics at Wichita State University, wrote that the governments’ unfair treatment allowed them to take advantage of regulatory privileges.
“Local governments’ purported compliance with the law was achieved by tilting the playing field to give municipal networks advantages over private market providers through subsidies, self-dealing, or privileged regulatory treatment,” he wrote.
He also claimed that a new bill under consideration by the Michigan Congress would exacerbate the alleged abuses.
“This preferential treatment of municipal networks deters entry and investment by private providers to the detriment of competition and, therefore, consumers,” he said.
But Ben Fineman of the Michigan Broadband Cooperative called the writing a hit piece and said that government broadband providers stepped in to fill a need not met by private industry.
“What alternative is the author suggesting?” he asked. “Should Lyndon residents have continued waiting patiently for more decades until a private provider stops ‘considering’ expanding and actually does something?”
Despite the report’s claims, Fineman said, there is in fact a private provider in the concerned area.
According to Bolema, government providers in Holland, Michigan have been unfairly enabled to compete with incumbent providers.
“Holland helped undercut private companies by subsidizing its broadband systems with a transfer from other city funds to help with start-up costs,” he said.
Fineman dismissed Bolema’s assertions as “laughable.”
“The townships who would leverage special assessment districts for broadband are those with significant populations without broadband access,” he said.
Bolema’s ten-page memo details other alleged abuses of the Michigan public broadband networks, but Fineman denied them, saying that because of the number of refutations, he “simply [did not] have time to address them all.”
Since the coronavirus pandemic, government agencies like the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the Federal Communications Commission have given millions of dollars to public infrastructure development and auctions for increased private service.
Rural
Smaller Carriers Serving Rural Communities Need Customer Service to Stand Out

June 30, 2020 — The Michigan Broadband Cooperative is hitting back at a report from the Free State Foundation that claims that local governments in Michigan frequently abuse broadband restrictions placed on them.
Theodore Bolema, professor of economics at Wichita State University, wrote that the governments’ unfair treatment allowed them to take advantage of regulatory privileges.
“Local governments’ purported compliance with the law was achieved by tilting the playing field to give municipal networks advantages over private market providers through subsidies, self-dealing, or privileged regulatory treatment,” he wrote.
He also claimed that a new bill under consideration by the Michigan Congress would exacerbate the alleged abuses.
“This preferential treatment of municipal networks deters entry and investment by private providers to the detriment of competition and, therefore, consumers,” he said.
But Ben Fineman of the Michigan Broadband Cooperative called the writing a hit piece and said that government broadband providers stepped in to fill a need not met by private industry.
“What alternative is the author suggesting?” he asked. “Should Lyndon residents have continued waiting patiently for more decades until a private provider stops ‘considering’ expanding and actually does something?”
Despite the report’s claims, Fineman said, there is in fact a private provider in the concerned area.
According to Bolema, government providers in Holland, Michigan have been unfairly enabled to compete with incumbent providers.
“Holland helped undercut private companies by subsidizing its broadband systems with a transfer from other city funds to help with start-up costs,” he said.
Fineman dismissed Bolema’s assertions as “laughable.”
“The townships who would leverage special assessment districts for broadband are those with significant populations without broadband access,” he said.
Bolema’s ten-page memo details other alleged abuses of the Michigan public broadband networks, but Fineman denied them, saying that because of the number of refutations, he “simply [did not] have time to address them all.”
Since the coronavirus pandemic, government agencies like the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the Federal Communications Commission have given millions of dollars to public infrastructure development and auctions for increased private service.
Wireless
Wireless Infrastructure Advocates Urge Municipalities to Work Collaboratively on 5G Facilities

June 30, 2020 — The Michigan Broadband Cooperative is hitting back at a report from the Free State Foundation that claims that local governments in Michigan frequently abuse broadband restrictions placed on them.
Theodore Bolema, professor of economics at Wichita State University, wrote that the governments’ unfair treatment allowed them to take advantage of regulatory privileges.
“Local governments’ purported compliance with the law was achieved by tilting the playing field to give municipal networks advantages over private market providers through subsidies, self-dealing, or privileged regulatory treatment,” he wrote.
He also claimed that a new bill under consideration by the Michigan Congress would exacerbate the alleged abuses.
“This preferential treatment of municipal networks deters entry and investment by private providers to the detriment of competition and, therefore, consumers,” he said.
But Ben Fineman of the Michigan Broadband Cooperative called the writing a hit piece and said that government broadband providers stepped in to fill a need not met by private industry.
“What alternative is the author suggesting?” he asked. “Should Lyndon residents have continued waiting patiently for more decades until a private provider stops ‘considering’ expanding and actually does something?”
Despite the report’s claims, Fineman said, there is in fact a private provider in the concerned area.
According to Bolema, government providers in Holland, Michigan have been unfairly enabled to compete with incumbent providers.
“Holland helped undercut private companies by subsidizing its broadband systems with a transfer from other city funds to help with start-up costs,” he said.
Fineman dismissed Bolema’s assertions as “laughable.”
“The townships who would leverage special assessment districts for broadband are those with significant populations without broadband access,” he said.
Bolema’s ten-page memo details other alleged abuses of the Michigan public broadband networks, but Fineman denied them, saying that because of the number of refutations, he “simply [did not] have time to address them all.”
Since the coronavirus pandemic, government agencies like the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the Federal Communications Commission have given millions of dollars to public infrastructure development and auctions for increased private service.
-
Artificial Intelligence3 months ago
U.S. Special Operations Command Employs AI and Machine Learning to Improve Operations
-
Broadband Roundup3 months ago
Benton on Middle Mile Open Access Networks, CENIC Fiber Route in California, Investors Buying Bitcoin
-
Section 2304 months ago
President Trump’s FCC Nominee Grilled on Section 230 During Senate Confirmation Hearing
-
Artificial Intelligence1 month ago
Artificial Intelligence Aims to Enhance Human Capabilities, But Only With Caution and Safeguards
-
Broadband Roundup3 months ago
Trump Signs Executive Order on Artificial Intelligence, How Not to Wreck the FCC, Broadband Performance in Europe
-
5G3 months ago
5G Stands to Impact Industry Before Consumers, Says Verizon CEO Hans Vestberg
-
Fiber2 months ago
Smaller Internet Providers Were Instrumental to Fiber Deployment in 2020, Says Fiber Broadband Association
-
#broadbandlive3 months ago
Broadband Breakfast Live Online Event Series on ‘Tools for Broadband Deployment’ on Enhancing Rural America